What's new

chinese withdrawal

. .
But you just claimed some time back it's a decisive Chinese Victory.:rofl:

Never did , I just said that wait for more details about conditions that Indians agreed to , for the withdrawal .

China was staying put but they blinked at last but not before pushing us closer to Japan.

The constructions will be slowed down or stopped as per the reports , so this blinking is beyond me .

A lot will become clearer in the coming days , this is merely the initial wave of information .
 
.
The Indians are obsess with @HongWu. This guy is now famous for being a Chinese yet talking like an Indian.

HongWu's main source of authorty is ToI. Seems like he is sitting in New Delhi, urging the PLA to fight the Indian army. Perhaps he is an arms dealer ? :undecided:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
LOL at India shupa-powa retreating from your own territory and capitulating to Chinese demands after PLA coercive diplomacy!

Quid pro quo behind India-China de-escalation? - The Times of India

NEW DELHI: It seems there was some sort of "a quid pro quo" behind the mutual withdrawal of Indian and Chinese troops from the 16,300-feet face-off site in the Depsang Bulge area of northern Ladakh on Sunday evening.

With India furiously working the diplomatic channels ahead of foreign minister Salman Khurshid's visit to Beijing on May 9, in preparation for Chinese premier Li Keqiang's trip to India on May 20, two back-to-back flag meetings were held between local commanders at Spanggur Gap area between Daulat Beg Oldi and Chushul sectors on Saturday and Sunday afternoons.

By 7.30pm on Sunday, the two forces - with 30 to 40 troops each - had begun to withdraw from the 20-day-old standoff site along the Raki Nala, which India perceives to be 19-km inside Indian territory, after a handshake between the two local commanders at the fifth flag meeting held earlier in the day.

Though there was no immediate official word on what were the exact terms of disengagement but sources said "there was some give-and-take" to resolve the face-off. "There had to be some face-saver for the Chinese," said a source.

China, since the very beginning and through the first three flag meetings on April 18, 23 and 30, had remained adamant that India should dismantle its forward observation post at Chumar in eastern Ladakh since it overlooks Chinese highways and can detect any troop movement there.

India, in turn, was demanding that the over 32 Chinese troops, who had pitched tents at the face-off site and were getting their supplies through regular vehicular support, should return to their pre-April 15 positions. India was worried about the deep Chinese intrusion in the Depsang Bulge area, a table-top plateau, since it threatened to cut its access to around 750 sqkm area in the region.

The face-off site was just about 40-km south of the strategic Karakoram Pass, which is at the tri-junction of China-Pakistan-India borders, and overlooks the Siachen Glacier-Saltoro Ridge to the west and the Indian observation post in the Chumar sector to the east.

Though already angry with India's re-activation of advanced landing grounds at Daulat Beg Oldi, Fukche and Nyoma and building of other infrastructure along the LAC over the last four-five years, China had made the dismantling of the Chumar post as a pre-condition for de-escalation.

The Chinese, in fact, had earlier even tried to "immobilize" the surveillance cameras positioned at the Chumar post by cutting wires there. In June last year, Indian troops had intercepted two Chinese personnel on mules across the Chumar post. Though they were subsequently let off, with language being a barrier, China got hugely irritated about the incident. Holding that the two Chinese were from its revenue department, Beijing since then has been pressing hard for the Chumar post to be dismantled.

:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

Don't forget to vote for Congress!
 
.
itna gussa sasth kaliya acha nehi hey :omghaha: thanda hoo jao :lol:

apart from the war mongers here on pdf, it was beyond comprehension that two countries together amounting to 30% of humanity on earth will fight for a 15KM stretch which they were not going to use anyway !
 
. . . .
LOL at India shupa-powa retreating from your own territory and capitulating to Chinese demands after PLA coercive diplomacy!

Quid pro quo behind India-China de-escalation? - The Times of India

NEW DELHI: It seems there was some sort of "a quid pro quo" behind the mutual withdrawal of Indian and Chinese troops from the 16,300-feet face-off site in the Depsang Bulge area of northern Ladakh on Sunday evening.

With India furiously working the diplomatic channels ahead of foreign minister Salman Khurshid's visit to Beijing on May 9, in preparation for Chinese premier Li Keqiang's trip to India on May 20, two back-to-back flag meetings were held between local commanders at Spanggur Gap area between Daulat Beg Oldi and Chushul sectors on Saturday and Sunday afternoons.

By 7.30pm on Sunday, the two forces - with 30 to 40 troops each - had begun to withdraw from the 20-day-old standoff site along the Raki Nala, which India perceives to be 19-km inside Indian territory, after a handshake between the two local commanders at the fifth flag meeting held earlier in the day.

Though there was no immediate official word on what were the exact terms of disengagement but sources said "there was some give-and-take" to resolve the face-off. "There had to be some face-saver for the Chinese," said a source.

China, since the very beginning and through the first three flag meetings on April 18, 23 and 30, had remained adamant that India should dismantle its forward observation post at Chumar in eastern Ladakh since it overlooks Chinese highways and can detect any troop movement there.

India, in turn, was demanding that the over 32 Chinese troops, who had pitched tents at the face-off site and were getting their supplies through regular vehicular support, should return to their pre-April 15 positions. India was worried about the deep Chinese intrusion in the Depsang Bulge area, a table-top plateau, since it threatened to cut its access to around 750 sqkm area in the region.

The face-off site was just about 40-km south of the strategic Karakoram Pass, which is at the tri-junction of China-Pakistan-India borders, and overlooks the Siachen Glacier-Saltoro Ridge to the west and the Indian observation post in the Chumar sector to the east.

Though already angry with India's re-activation of advanced landing grounds at Daulat Beg Oldi, Fukche and Nyoma and building of other infrastructure along the LAC over the last four-five years, China had made the dismantling of the Chumar post as a pre-condition for de-escalation.

The Chinese, in fact, had earlier even tried to "immobilize" the surveillance cameras positioned at the Chumar post by cutting wires there. In June last year, Indian troops had intercepted two Chinese personnel on mules across the Chumar post. Though they were subsequently let off, with language being a barrier, China got hugely irritated about the incident. Holding that the two Chinese were from its revenue department, Beijing since then has been pressing hard for the Chumar post to be dismantled.

:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

Don't forget to vote for Congress!


Well that sums it all :lol:
 
.
apart from the war mongers here on pdf, it was beyond comprehension that two countries together amounting to 30% of humanity on earth will fight for a 15KM stretch which they were not going to use anyway !

well if you check old threads and posts about this issue, many indian members wanted to attack china :ashamed:
 
.
HongWu's main source of authorty is ToI. Seems like he is sitting in New Delhi, urging the PLA to fight the Indian army. Perhaps he is an arms dealer ? :undecided:

Maybe you are correct. But its time for the Indians to stop responding to him. He is able to get Indians to waste 27 pages of time talking to him. I'm not sure when comes out on top with this China-India stand off. But when it comes to this thread, @HongWu owns the rest of Indian posters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Well that sums it all :lol:
Actually it's you (and other Indians) who feel so humiliated now because you really thought India was some kind of shupa-powa!

India can kiss Chumar good-bye! Great Sun-Tzu move by China.

:omghaha:
 
.
rather than beating the bush you would have done better to go through some earlier articles which appropriately highlighted the structures which pla objected to..

What can I do if people do not read the posts ? The result is unnecessary repetition .

I have , I know what they objected to . But still people are having difficulty in understanding the " quid pro quo " thing .
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom