He he..keep lying here with a straight face.Almost all the islamophobic rants in India come from the organisation(RSS) you are affiliated to and most likely share its views as one of its cadre.The rest of your post is as well baloney of such orgs with cherry picking from your texts,religious ones at that.
So RSS,bajrang dal ,VHP,durga vahini and pogroms against minorities like Gujarat isn't right wing enough?Maybe you want same or worse to be done to muslims for driving out kashmiri pandits.Keeping all that pent up rage and thirst for vengeance locked up to present a normal image to others leading to even greater depths of depravity?
Bingo!!You answered the question why India is likely to disintegrate.India itself never had a history of being unified,particularly the modern day India.Just like the mid-eastern states you refer to,India came into existence due to the magnificient and almost sudden collapse of their empire due to their inability to maintain it after a sapping world war.The brits didn't have the time to divide it into more sensible divisions and had to leave it all,case in point the crown colony proposal in the NE of India,particularly its hill states.Hence why we see the lingering issues in India,because it is not a natural entity.J&K,NE are outright demanding their due right of independence.
Even the demands for separate states in most regions of India show this,with demands for formation for new states being driven by their perception of a separate identity, with new states being actually formed on identity politics instead of the sake administrative efficiency,with the latter being just an excuse to realise their aims of separation from groups it sees as the other.The most recent examples being telangana where people seen as "from and of Andhra" are being discriminated.Or even the demands in west bengal for a separate gurkhaland.
All said and done,it just shows how hollow your propaganda fed ideas are,right wing underwear one at that(which is even more ridiculous than what the leftists of India use)
Ditto in India.Punjab,J&K,Maoists,almost entire NE were or are held together under the barrel of gun and the underlying threat of use of rape and sexual violence.Even the "unification" of India was achieved by force,princely states,goa,J&K and NE anyone.So you were saying?
There it goes again.Indian inability to understand the word secular.It means the separation of religion and state.A country can be secular,an institution can be,not a person.How in heavens name were you guys able to twist the word and its meaning to apply to individuals?
Oh right,In India,secular means equal pampering of all religions and same levels of interference in the functioning of state.So In India what is called secular and yes this applies to both the self-proclaimed "real seculars" and the ones they call "sickulars" are actually pseudo-seculars,maybe including DRAY himself.
As an agnostic/atheist I don't think much of any religion and will freely degrade them to my heart's content and ironically,the concept of secularism actually came from atheists and agnostics,for they were tired of the role of religion in seemingly every sphere of life.Only in India do religious bigots accuse atheists and agnostics of being "not secular",no fault of the latter I guess, as they just grew up with a misconception of what secular means,to the extent of using it to describe Individuals.BTW,if I was a Chinese,I would officially be under a secular government in the true sense and not the oxymoronic "secular" India.If "secular" could be applied to individuals and if I was a Chinese citizen,would almost qualify for it automatically,unless i held views to the contrary.
