What's new

China's Airborne Aircraft Carrier Concept!

Actually an airborne massive aircraft is not a bad idea. for this massive aircraft to hold many strike aircrafts in it is all the better.

And it is not Impossible. people used to say walking on the moon is Impossible and will probably lock you in a nuthouse for it. Nuclear powered rotter propellants with enough force to carry it upward and forward also jet engines powered by nuclear power could make it feasible.

Also obviously you can't have the aircrafts just setting there for many reasons the first one to come to mind is pilots will freeze to death (If it is a UACV then it is a different matter) it should have some chambered runways and workshops for maintenance.

Besides I bet this thing can carry more weapons than you can imagine so it will be one formidable airborne fortress. But I do not see it happening now mainly because no country in the world can carry as much funds to research and operate one. But is possible int he future? sure why not.
 
I wonder if Alien UFOs use this tech? :what:
and its amazing that man is not able to shot EVEN one down yet.......if it could then......may be new era of techs may be revealed....:cheesy:

Well it's not that UFOs are as common as Butterflies in flight, right?
Let alone shoot one down! But who knows Area-51 might have
some unsolved mysteries after all.
 
Lolx when i said that??
They may be 100x more sophisticated and have high tech than man ever have made....
But everything in this world is imperfect so its wonderful that they have no destroyed ufos... or they dint left any of the signs if there was any crash.... and if man has got any of that kinda tech, that will be very hard to know about that....
However it would take another century if not 2 or 3 to make a near to those....
 
:lazy: *yawn* :lazy:

Wake me up when some country comes up with space ships - armed to the teeth.
 
:lazy: *yawn* :lazy:

Wake me up when some country comes up with space ships - armed to the teeth.
Why space ships armed to the teeth?? Who are you going to fight?? Or is it a matter of "just in case" we find aliens we will blow them half way to.....whatever the hell they came from. LOL
 
I wonder if Alien UFOs use this tech? :what:
and its amazing that man is not able to shot EVEN one down yet.......if it could then......may be new era of techs may be revealed....:cheesy:

Well, as for shooting down a UFO, there's that Roswell incident in the US of A in 1947 where an alien UFO purportedly crashed and retrieved by the U.S Army together with three alien bodies. It is said that one survived and disclosed secret alien propulsion technology using the crashed UFO. He too died after a few years in captivity.

According to insiders, Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works and Boeing's Phantom Works, the top secret black organizations reverse engineered the alien anti gravity technology to produce propulsion systems being used in the TAW-50, Nautilus, and the Aurora craft. Northrop too incorporated some of the tech on the stealth B-2 bombers. It is said that many UFOs have crashed or shot down and retrieved. Hangar 18 at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base allegedly houses evidence from not only the Roswell UFO incident, but also other downed UFOs.

Scientific papers in the LANL archives lay down the scientific percepts of 'gravity shielding' which is probably what anti gravity is all about. Therefore, is faster-than-light travel possible? Sure it is, with 'Gravity shielding' which is well within the paradigms of Einstein's theory of relativity! :whistle:
 
You do realize that this was taken from a blog by a military fan, right? No credibility whatsoever.

Unless the thing floats by means of fanboy dream clouds.
 
anti gravity propulsion[/B]. This isn't some kind of joke as Chinese scientists have already progressed in this sphere to develop anti gravity technology based on the Emm Drive device. Here's the link to that...

China Confirms the Development of Anti-Gravity Technology, Based on 'EmDrive' Device

1. Actually anti-gravity in this context is JOKE. 'Emm drive' works on concept of action-reaction where action be expulsion of microwave ...
2. The particles responsible for gravity higgs bosons arent event completely confirmed by scientists.. And someone who scientist who didnt bother to research about it , already started to employ the mechanism ? It is as ridiculous as monkey trying to program computer before learning english forget about computer..
(Just to be politically correct monkeys refer to we all humans and english can be substituted with whatever keyboard you have ..)
3. For somereason my mood is off today and I am very picky right now .. So dont mind picking on you un-moot but majority pointing bordering on pulp fictional writeup ... :)
Hope ya dont mind. ..
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom