What's new

China to US: NSG is not going to be Obama's going away gift to India

That's a business/economics issue, even America's closest allies do that. :lol:

Anything in geopolitical terms?

Well I'm sorry if a picture-perfect geopolitical event did not materialise in these six months. But WTO disputes are big deals - they affect jobs and bottomlines and nothing lobbies US Congress and the President as much as their constituencies and corporate donors.

But do read the voting at the UNHRC, especially on Syria - India has abstained at most of these votes - (US has a 100% affirmative record, China, Russia 100% negative). Wise decision too for Syria is none of our business and best not to poke into problematic areas of others.

http://latinamericagoesglobal.org/reports/who-supports-human-rights-on-the-un-human-rights-council/
 
.
Clearly you are unable to answer my question.

I'll ask again:

Tell me where "India has acted on its self interests and opposed the USA"... AFTER India signed the LEMOA? :lol:

LEMOA has given Indian ships and aircraft access to American bases in the Pacific.
 
.
LEMOA has given Indian ships and aircraft access to American bases in the Pacific.

LEMOA is not a suicide pact like NATO is. If the Chinese want to think this compromises Indian sovereignty, let them think that.

On topic:

If China wants to block India's entry into NSG then let them do so, knowing full well that Pakistan will not get in unless India gets in. And Pakistan wants to get in. This is has been made clear. And forget about this criteria-based approach nonsense. This is straight-up about power politics. China will get out of the way if they get something in return. It's just good, old-fashioned horse trading.
 
.
LEMOA is not a suicide pact like NATO is. If the Chinese want to think this compromises Indian sovereignty, let them think that.

On topic:

If China wants to block India's entry into NSG then let them do so, knowing full well that Pakistan will not get in unless India gets in. And Pakistan wants to get in. This is has been made clear. And forget about this criteria-based approach nonsense. This is straight-up about power politics. China will get out of the way if they get something in return. It's just good, old-fashioned horse trading.

They don't care about Pakistan. They don't want India to get in because India will start competing with China in geopolitics then. We will be able to sell reactors to other countries and they don't want that to happen. Pakistan is simply their crutch, an excuse to keep India out.
 
.
Both assertions are incorrect. Whites wouldn't be high caste either.

According to Hinduism, high caste is earned. By becoming a doctor, teacher, scientist, engineer etc or by joining the police, army etc earns you a high caste status.

You are an 'untouchable' if all you want to do in your life is waste it away. Because then all you will get is menial tasks which end up making you an untouchable. And because you wasted a precious chance at life, that many don't get, you will be punished in the afterlife.

That's the basic rule anyway.

And you are wrong about the west being Aryan also. Hitler wanted Germans associated with the Indian race for his own goals because of India's rich ancient history. The western theory of an Aryan race has been dismissed. Aryan is not a race.

Anyway, the current caste system was created by the British.
Seriously, you do not even know your own caste system? or are you trying to fool us?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom