What's new

CHINA SHOULD BREAKUP INDIA:THINK TANK

Yeah, always thinking about the revenge for 1962 is plain silly, today's China doesn't consider India as its enemy, but a possible strategic partner to contain the West.

That's why India should stop living in the past, and it thinks more about the future.
 
.
this pic is nice i love the pic where they painted te grenade green n written pakistan on it.1962 and 1965 made india lose its self esteem and then in kargil they nearly lost 200,000 to pakistan but they did the same istead of fighting they ran to UN for protection what they did in 1948 and i 1962 and 1965

but final word is we created a nation called bangladesh (we erased west from your west pakistan) , since pakistan tried 4 time but lost , today we are building 18 dams , in future we will be building another 20 , totally 38 in kashmir(on indus) , and your agriculture will be on our mercy
 
.
but final word is we created a nation called bangladesh (we erased west from your west pakistan) , since pakistan tried 4 time but lost , today we are building 18 dams , in future we will be building another 20 , totally 38 in kashmir(on indus) , and your agriculture will be on our mercy
see u prove urself that india is meddeling in other countries internal affairs and it should not cry like inflitration infiltration when meddeled in.india is cut the fruits of its own tree sooner then later
 
.
but final word is we created a nation called bangladesh (we erased west from your west pakistan) , since pakistan tried 4 time but lost , today we are building 18 dams , in future we will be building another 20 , totally 38 in kashmir(on indus) , and your agriculture will be on our mercy
1 dam is built on 1billion dollar and 1 bunker buster cost 1 million pakistan 38 bunker busters can collapse indian economy and flood away and cut its military supllylines for 300 km.if you stop water we got the means to open it again just 28 missiles or bombs and 38 billion dollar goes to arabian sea in water
 
.
Yeah, always thinking about the revenge for 1962 is plain silly, today's China doesn't consider India as its enemy, but a possible strategic partner to contain the West.

Yeah along with this guy (Parag Khanna) I think India's importance in the future will as a significant swing state between the different power blocs. As such India is probably in for some woeing and seducing from various sides.

China can get India on its side on some issues like global warming, but I feel that Russia is a more potent player at the moment and its interests are better aligned with China's.
 
.
India/china should grow up and start to get used to the freedom of thoughts and the difference between the idea of a think tank and a national policy.

---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:25 PM ----------

just stop behave like a child crying if he dose not get candy.

very well put sir and equally applicable to India and china on the Dalai Lama issue
 
.
both countries are on the development ladder and climbing quickly, China faster than India. I think a China, India, Russia and Pakistan block can take over the world economically if working together, but that is practically nearly impossible.
 
.
We should not worry to take over the world but first we should try to improve the living standard of our peoples :)
 
.
I mentioned "economically", and it can only happen if you develop the living standard internally, to do that, we have to come out of petty differences and sort out BIG problems with each other.. China's problems with India, Pakistan's problems with India and so forth.. Solving the mutual problems will reduce the burden of Defense Budget on weak economies and hence, money could be used for better purpose..
 
.
Dawood should move to China, he can become an overnight celebrity just like Dalai Lama. Oh wait.. he already is. :cheers:
 
.
Almost coinciding with the 13th round of Sino-Indian border talks (New Delhi [ Images ], August 7-8, 2009), an article (in the Chinese language) has appeared in China captioned 'If China takes a little action, the so-called Great Indian Federation can be broken up' (Zhong Guo Zhan Lue Gang, www.iiss.cn, Chinese, August 8, 2009).
Interestingly, it has been reproduced in several other strategic and military Web sites of the country and by all means, targets the domestic audience. The authoritative host site is located in Beijing [ Images ] and is the new edition of one, which so far represented the China International Institute for Strategic Studies (www.chinaiiss.org).

Claiming that Beijing's 'China-Centric' Asian strategy, provides for splitting India [ Images ], the writer of the article, Zhan Lue (strategy), has found that New Delhi's corresponding 'India-Centric' policy in Asia, is in reality a 'Hindustan centric' one. Stating that on the other hand 'local centres' exist in several of the country's provinces (excepting for the UP and certain northern regions), Zhan Lue has felt that in the face of such local characteristics, the 'so-called' Indian nation cannot be considered as one having existed in history.

According to the article, if India today relies on any thing for unity, it is the Hindu religion. The partition of the country was based on religion. Stating that today nation states are the main current in the world, it has said that India could only be termed now as a 'Hindu religious state'. Adding that Hinduism is a decadent religion as it allows caste exploitation and is unhelpful to the country's modernisation, it described the Indian government as one in a dilemma with regard to eradication of the caste system as it realises that the process to do away with castes may shake the foundation of the consciousness of the Indian nation.

The writer has argued that in view of the above, China in its own interest and the progress of Asia, should join forces with different nationalities like the Assamese, Tamils, and Kashmiris and support the latter in establishing independent nation-States of their own, out of India. In particular, the ULFA (United Liberation Front of Asom) in Assam, a territory neighboring China, can be helped by China so that Assam realises its national independence.

The article has also felt that for Bangladesh, the biggest threat is from India, which wants to develop a great Indian Federation extending from Afghanistan to Myanmar. India is also targeting China with support to Vietnam's efforts to occupy Nansha (Spratly) group of islands in South China Sea.

Hence the need for China's consolidation of its alliance with Bangladesh, a country with which the US and Japan [ Images ] are also improving their relations to counter China.

It has pointed out that China can give political support to Bangladesh enabling the latter to encourage ethnic Bengalis in India to get rid of Indian control and unite with Bangladesh as one Bengali nation; if the same is not possible, creation of at least another free Bengali nation state as a friendly neighbour of Bangladesh, would be desirable, for the purpose of weakening India's expansion and threat aimed at forming a 'unified South Asia'.

The punch line in the article has been that to split India, China can bring into its fold countries like Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan, support ULFA in attaining its goal for Assam's independence, back aspirations of Indian nationalities like the Tamils and Nagas, encourage Bangladesh to give a push to the independence of West Bengal [ Images ] and lastly recover the 90,000 sq km territory in southern Tibet [ Images ].

Wishing for India's break-up into 20 to 30 nation-States like in Europe, the article has concluded by saying that if the consciousness of nationalities in India could be aroused, social reforms in South Asia can be achieved, the caste system can be eradicated and the region can march along the road of prosperity.

The Chinese article in question will certainly outrage readers in India. Its suggestion that China can follow a strategy to dismember India, a country always with a tradition of unity in diversity, is atrocious, to say the least. The write-up could not have been published without the permission of the Chinese authorities, but it is sure that Beijing will wash its hands out of this if the matter is taken up with it by New Delhi.

It has generally been seen that China is speaking in two voices -- its diplomatic interlocutors have always shown understanding during their dealings with their Indian counterparts, but its selected media is pouring venom on India in their reporting. Which one to believe is a question confronting the public opinion and even policy makers in India.

In any case, an approach of panic towards such outbursts will be a mistake, but also ignoring them will prove to be costly for India.

D S Rajan, is Director, Chennai Centre for China Studies.

Pakistan should work with china on this as india is work working with US on the same sort of doctirn called cold start

I simply don't understand time again we, instead of focusing on how we could make our lives better run and think of what India and China would do to each other. I would have appreciated if this article had come from a Chinese member. But from one of us .... feels disgusted.

It just shows the policy which we followed from the very beginning ..... "WHEN IN TROUBLE... POINT YOUR FINGERS TOWARDS YOUR NEIGHBOR"

:hitwall:
 
. .
Dawood should move to China, he can become an overnight celebrity just like Dalai Lama. Oh wait.. he already is. :cheers:

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind". That's what Ghandi said anyway. :P

There is no need for a revenge move, they will reap what they have sown, without our interference. By the law of cause and effect.
 
.
Can anyone explain to this me?

the writer of the article, Zhan Lue (strategy), has found that New Delhi's corresponding 'India-Centric' policy in Asia, is in reality a 'Hindustan centric' one.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom