What's new

China ridicules Indian navy

China can build even 4-5 aircraft carriers in the next few years but the operational procedures of an aircraft carrier is very complex and takes years of experience to master it. Only few countries has that expertise and India is one of them. For Chinese it will take a decade atleast until they have the required experience and expertise and a mature Operational manual. Until then their ACs are sitting ducks.

Indian talk so much about their aircraft carrier experience.

When was the last time an Indian Pilot landed by arrested landing on an aircraft carrier ? 20 years ago ? 30 years ago ? Maybe even 40 years ago. Yea... and with a plane that first flew in 1947 !

Oh by the way, your Vikramatiya has no air defense and will not have any air defense for 3 years after delivery.Talk big some more about sitting duck.
 
.
Indian talk so much about their aircraft carrier experience.

When was the last time an Indian Pilot landed by arrested landing on an aircraft carrier ? 20 years ago ? 30 years ago ? Maybe even 40 years ago. Yea... and with a plane that first flew in 1947 !

Oh by the way, your Vikramatiya has no air defense and will not have any air defense for 3 years after delivery.Talk big some more about sitting duck.

does your casino have air defence?
 
.
@Alienware and @KID (Kiss of Dragon :D)

Do not think the billion Chinese are fools. You do not have any experience with A/C. Its like saying yes we got J-10 and now we can **** the hell out of F-22.

India don't have F-22 to begin with :lol:..so there is no comparaison of J-10 to F-22 :lol:. As to compare India vs Chinese in term of carrier experience, if you think Indians are miles ahead of Chinese base on previous carrier's experience, then why Indian pilotes couldn't land the mig-29k on the carrier by themself and still relied on Russians for take off/landing test. Beside landing and take off the J-15, China is fully on the command of our Laoning from A to Z: from cooking, health care and even internal entertaining, the carrier is already operated as small village.

inside-chinese-aircraft-carrier.png


Repair and maintenance

Chinese+aircraft+carrier+j-15+flying+shark+fighterChina++Aircraft+Carrier+Liaoning+CV16+j-15+16+17+22+21+31+z8+9+10+11+aesa+J-15+Flying+Shark++OPERATIONALFlying+Shark+Shi+Lang+z-8+helicopter+aew+%252810%2529.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
I don't need certificate from RSS or BAjrangDal or Internet Hindu to call myself Indian ,As Indian i am more worried about its people then Government [Congress or Dcik worshipper Modi].

When i come on PDF i just see only one Side of india continuously and that is the point of view of Chaddi Company and thank god that is not view of the majority indian.

lots of Internet chaddi company is worried about defense and not worried about the state of people there in .

and when somebody points their attention towards they start attacking them by saying Desh Drohi or pakistani Because they want to live in denial and they don't wont to come out of bollywood living in fantasy world.

I remember talking to my RSS friend from mumbai and he was talking about how stupid decision was to give away pakistan and still mentain big population of muslim in india @ the time of partition was a big mistake and in couple of decades how the muslim will be in majority.and will be getting ready to separate big chuck of our country.:cheesy:

Srinivas south indian must be working in DRDO because of your incompetent we have to listen to BS of Pakistani and Chinese
raise your level and do some thing better then eating idli sambhar. :omghaha:
If you feel that India flag is a shame, remove it, why whine and complain about our country as if we want you people as a flag bearers.

On the contrary the same people who ranted for ages are now finding India a better place, where as India is progressing and arriving on world stage.

Your post is reported for your ignorant rants. For you to comment on India you must have a flag to compare where is it??

Show your country and compare it, pathetic troll.
 
. .
So what's the latest on the Kolkata Class?

Still gathering rust and dust where they were floated out centuries ago?:rofl:

Wow .. I never knew we built destroyers centuries ago.

My history majors is in Ancient India (mainly 2500 BC to 500 AD) ... encountered nothing about these until 500 AD.

These must in later centuries, post 500 AD.

But I do know that Indians knew about rust-resistant steel making techniques as early as 1000 AD. The Iron Pillar in Delhi is a verifiable historical proof. No wonder, the Indian ships don't rust at all.
 
.
Wow .. I never knew we built destroyers centuries ago.

My history majors is in Ancient India (mainly 2500 BC to 500 AD) ... encountered nothing about these until 500 AD.

These must in later centuries, post 500 AD.

But I do know that Indians knew about rust-resistant steel making techniques as early as 1000 AD. The Iron Pillar in Delhi is a verifiable historical proof. No wonder, the Indian ships don't rust at all.

The Kolkata-class destroyers main air defence missile is the Barak 8. Maximum speed of Mach 2 :rofl: and a maximum range of 70 km :omghaha:

Barak 8 is one of the worst air-defence missiles ever produced and due to its low speed and limited range, Barak 8 will find it hard to perform local and wide area defence effectively. Cross target interception against multiple targets will be impossible for Barak 8, especially vs supersonic targets.

Mach 2 is pathetic!!!

Kolkata-class are a joke and a humiliation for India!!!!!!!

EDIT: India would be better off buying the British CAMM missile. It has speeds of Mach 3 and an operational range of over 25 km. CAMM is also vastly more maneuverable than Barak 8 with a much higher probability of intercept vs multiple supersonic targets!
 
.
The Kolkata-class destroyers main air defence missile is the Barak 8. Maximum speed of Mach 2 :rofl: and a maximum range of 70 km :omghaha:

Barak 8 is one of the worst air-defence missiles ever produced and due to its low speed and limited range, Barak 8 will find it hard to perform local and wide area defence effectively. Cross target interception against multiple targets will be impossible for Barak 8, especially vs supersonic targets.

Mach 2 is pathetic!!!

Kolkata-class are a joke and a humiliation for India!!!!!!!

can you educate us about 7000 km range and mach 22 capable chinese air defence missiles? Or are you another chinese troll who posterior was forcefully invaded by indians?
 
.
can you educate us about 7000 km range and mach 22 capable chinese air defence missiles? Or are you another chinese troll who posterior was forcefully invaded by indians?

No thank you, I will educate you on how shite and pathetic Barak 8 and the Kolkata-class are! :omghaha:

Mach 2 :rofl::rofl::rofl:


At-least Chinas 'AEGIS' is equipped with proper air-defence missiles with high speed, excellent maneuverability and long range.

Like I said in my previous post, India should have bought CAMM, not the crap Barak 8. Your former colonial masters are still superior to you and they operate technology decades ahead of anything India has...

India is pathetic... :omghaha:
 
.
No thank you, I will educate you on how shite and pathetic Barak 8 and the Kolkata-class are! :omghaha:

Mach 2 :rofl::rofl::rofl:


At-least Chinas 'AEGIS' is equipped with proper air-defence missiles with high speed, excellent maneuverability and long range.

Like I said in my previous post, India should have bought CAMM, not the crap Barak 8. Your former colonial masters are still superior to you and they operate technology decades ahead of anything India has...

India is pathetic... :omghaha:

why don't you tell me about those missiles you are talking about? what are specs, on which ships are they deployed? give a source

i hope the diameter of your posterior wasn't too small for an indian guy.
 
.
why don't you tell me about those missiles you are talking about? what are specs, on which ships are they deployed? give a source

i hope the diameter of your posterior wasn't too small for an indian guy.

Search for Type 052C and D destroyers on IHS Janes fighting ships (need membership) Janes is one of the worlds top 'Defense & Security Intelligence and Analysis' along with the IISS, SIPR, RUSI etc.

HHQ-9A is the primary air-defence missile of these 'AEGIS' like destroyers. HHQ-9A has an operational range of approximately 200 km and reaches speeds over Mach 4. HHQ-9A is also developed in China.

India is building 6 052Cs and 8 052Ds, a total of 14!!! Plans are already underway for a new class of Type 055 destroyers which will have a displacement of 12,000 tonnes more advanced AESA radars and air-defence missiles. It is expected some 30 Type 055 series destroyers will be built.

India only has plans for 7 Kolkata-class destroyers (3 Project-15A and 4 Project-15B). But now that the Indian economy is on the verge of collapse and the Rupee is in free fall, I doubt the 4 Project 15B will be built.

Rule China, China Rules the Waves! :china: (Sorry Britannia!)
 
.
Search for Type 052C and D destroyers on IHS Janes fighting ships (need membership) Janes is one of the worlds top 'Defense & Security Intelligence and Analysis' along with the IISS, SIPR, RUSI etc.

HHQ-9A is the primary air-defence missile of these 'AEGIS' like destroyers. HHQ-9A has an operational range of approximately 200 km and reaches speeds over Mach 4. HHQ-9A is also developed in China.

India is building 6 052Cs and 8 052Ds, a total of 14!!! Plans are already underway for a new class of Type 055 destroyers which will have a displacement of 12,000 tonnes more advanced AESA radars and air-defence missiles. It is expected some 30 Type 055 series destroyers will be built.

India only has plans for 7 Kolkata-class destroyers (3 Project-15A and 4 Project-15B). But now that the Indian economy is on the verge of collapse and the Rupee is in free fall, I doubt the 4 Project 15B will be built.

Rule China, China Rules the Waves! :china: (Sorry Britannia!)

are you trying to kill me of laughter? a 1300 kg ballistic missile with inertial midcourse guidance is better than a 275 kg cruise missile with GPS guidance?

China rules the waves, indeed. Best examples of chinese IQ are found on PDF.
 
.
are you trying to kill me of laughter? a 1300 kg ballistic missile with inertial midcourse guidance is better than a 275 kg cruise missile with GPS guidance?

China rules the waves, indeed. Best examples of chinese IQ are found on PDF.

Yes the HHQ-9A is superior to the Barak 8. The HHQ-9A features a direct thrust vector giving it very high degrees of maneuverability at speeds and ranges over twice that of Barak 8! The HHQ-9A also has a high fire rate and can perform multiple cross target interceptions (Barak 8 cannot). The result is, while HHQ-9A is a true wide area defense weapon, Barak 8 is just a glorified point ship defence weapon.

The European Aster, CAMM and the American ESSM and Standard series are the best air-defence missiles on the market. HHQ-9A and Russian missiles are close, but still inferior to the West. Barak 8 is just a joke and a humiliation. Barak 1 is simply pathetic, worse than the British Sea Wolf developed in the 1970s :omghaha:

India, just a bunch of little brown people. I doubt you or any Indian could penetrate my posterior... not with your shriveled up little pricks. :rofl:
 
.
am i seeing a BOT compare Barak with a chinese SAM and a chinese ship with Kolkota class destroyers? :lol: oh the high iq

what next? a j11 compared with an f22?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom