What's new

China provokes again, troops enter Indian territory in Ladakh

This is why I think chinese are a bit stupid socially speaking. With the recent events India had with America, china could have used this as a time to get closer to India. What they do instead? Invade her.
 
. .
This is why I think chinese are a bit stupid socially speaking. With the recent events India had with America, china could have used this as a time to get closer to India. What they do instead? Invade her.

Don't let your delusion get the better of you. India is insignificant on the world stage, it doesn't make a difference to China if you're closer to us.
 
Last edited:
.
maybe not any territorial gain but what about saving face, some of the tough love being dished out at the US some has to be aimed at China which has transgressed the ''Samman'' of the worlds greatest democracy, I am just wondering if and what will be the response....:coffee: If India doesnt need any Chinese territory then why does it have so many disputes with her, Sikkim, Aksai Chin etc

It is Indo-Tibet border not Indo - Chinese border and we do not know who Han chinese are.

India and Tibet has bilateral agreement when Macmohan line is accepted as a border, chinese occupied Tibet.

Is ignoring Chinese aggression a part of your foreign policy, I guess the meaning of confrontation changed while I was sleeping in during the weekend....:sick:

Chinese aggression will be dealt accordingly ...... No worries here :cheers:

is that ur justifying ur weakness

This is a strategic relationship based on strengths of each country. India is not asking Japanese for any help, it is the Japanese who are giving importance to India and are realizing they have done a mistake by helping chinese economy.
 
.
It is Indo-Tibet border not Indo - Chinese border and we do not know who Han chinese are.

Do you mean British Tibet border? Did British every acknowledge that Tibet was an independant country at any point in the history?
 
.
Hey Genius, the opposite of what you said might be happening. The little game you are playing with Japan could've provoked the "Chinese incursion". Try to be clever with us we'll kick your ***. What is Japan going to do? Invade China?:)

China is not the ultimate here ....... on the contrary it is stupidity for chinese to provoke to giants on either side, they lost the plot here ...... :lol:
 
.
China is not the ultimate here ....... on the contrary it is stupidity for chinese to provoke to giants on either side, they lost the plot here ...... :lol:

Japanese provoked many giants,Russia,China, South and North Korea. Indian at least provoked two nuclear powers,China and Pakistan.
 
.
Do you mean British Tibet border? Did British every acknowledge that Tibet was an independant country at any point in the history?

Rather it is British India and Tibet, and after that Independent India and Tibet.

Tibetan sovereignty debate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Based on historic perspective and weakened control of Chinese oppression on Tibetans, British considered Tibet as a sovereign state.

Japanese provoked many giants,Russia,China, South and North Korea. Indian at least provoked two nuclear powers,China and Pakistan.

Leave about India vs Pakistan, talk about chinese war mongering stupidity. Japanese and South Koreans are coming together thanks to delusional china.
 
.
Do you mean British Tibet border? Did British every acknowledge that Tibet was an independant country at any point in the history?

If Tibet wasn't independent how did it get the right as a signatory for India-Tibet border. :omghaha::omghaha:
 
.
India was not a country back then,so there's no India Tibet border. South Koreans can never come together.ha.China and Pakistan are always together.

China can sign an border agreement with Indian NE rebels without Indian government consent,but that doesnt make NE an independent country,or does it..

Not a single government in the world aknowledge that Tibet is an indepentent country,therefore any agreements signed by so called Tibetan government(they still have a government in India) are illegitamate.
 
Last edited:
.
If Tibet wasn't independent how did it get the right as a signatory for India-Tibet border. :omghaha::omghaha:

if Tibet independent declaration was valid, why were the Chinese in negotiation with the British at the Simla accord convention 1914?

Told you wiki/internet degree doesn't cut it.:laughcry:
 
Last edited:
.
if Tibet independent declaration was valid, why were the Chinese in negotiation with the British at the Simla accord convention 1914?

Told you wiki/internet degree doesn't cut it. Proper schooling is required.:laughcry:

China attended Shimla Conference to decide China-Tibet border, not the India-Tibet border. :girl_wacko: Now, don't tell us your CCP propaganda. :laugh:
 
.
Any country really believes that Tibet is an independent country? if not,all this Tibetan discussion is meaningless.
 
.
Rather it is British India and Tibet, and after that Independent India and Tibet.

Tibetan sovereignty debate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Based on historic perspective and weakened control of Chinese oppression on Tibetans, British considered Tibet as a sovereign state.



Leave about India vs Pakistan, talk about chinese war mongering stupidity. Japanese and South Koreans are coming together thanks to delusional china.


Tibet was integrated into China by Qing Dynasty, during the end days of Qing Dynasty in late 1800s, Qing Dynasty lost control over Tibet, the Republic of China never had control over Tibet, it wasn't until 1950 Tibet was annexed by China.
 
.
We will fight it out eventually,two countries and two armies,talking won't bring any result.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom