graphican
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2009
- Messages
- 12,433
- Reaction score
- 48
- Country
- Location
uestion is how many?? are we going for 36 or more??
136! Its Ramzan, ask for more!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
uestion is how many?? are we going for 36 or more??
You think I am being childish but I stand by my views 270 JF-17 Thunder and 100 F-16 and 100 either J-10B or J-11D is the way forward.And Sir, would you like FRIES with some KETCHUP ......
with diet coke make it large please .and some FRIES with KETCHUP ......
they are simply SU-27 Su-30 clones with some Chinese equipment they are as good as any other Chinese product in the modern times like J-10yaar im interested in J11B and specially J15. These are best.
J-10 is based on cancelled Israeli project called LAVEY due to U S refusal of supply of GE engine under ToT,although U S has already helped Israel a lot to develop avionics and radar for this Lavey project.Its that radar and avionics that became the basis of flourishing Israeli avionic industries today.Give little idea. PAF engineers were involved and donated one Mirage when this plane development started. But the issue was engine, when Russian refused third party export of AL31 engine. Pakistan had no choice just to scrap the deal. Now Russian has change the policy, hopefully Pak will get this engine.
Some years ago, China did offer Pakistan 36 J-10B. Pakistan did turn them down saying it wants to invest in a future generation aircraft.
With F-16s and JF-17s, J-10B will create a redundancy of capability and expense overhead for maintaining a new kind of platform.
I read about Pakistan turning down the offer and invest new generation platform somewhere on this forum. It was PAF Air Chief interview, if I recall correctly.
Sir but new J-11 D is far more advance than any other jet economy is the issue other wise we should get 100 of those instead of J-10 Bwith diet coke make it large please .
money is no issue just like 100 J-10s
they are simply SU-27 Su-30 clones with some Chinese equipment they are as good as any other Chinese product in the modern times like J-10
Don't trust Armed Forces interviews they on purpose lie they can't afford to tell the truth, it can be dangerous so they can still get J-10B.Some years ago, China did offer Pakistan 36 J-10B. Pakistan did turn them down saying it wants to invest in a future generation aircraft.
With F-16s and JF-17s, J-10B will create a redundancy of capability and expense overhead for maintaining a new kind of platform.
I read about Pakistan turning down the offer and invest new generation platform somewhere on this forum. It was PAF Air Chief interview, if I recall correctly.
New Recruit
with diet coke make it large please .
money is no issue just like 100 J-10s
they are simply SU-27 Su-30 clones with some Chinese equipment they are as good as any other Chinese product in the modern times like J-10
I agree completely and would prefer J-11 over J-10. a heavy twin engine jet can serve as missile and bomb platform but will require radical change in PAF thinking.. I disagree with inducting 100s of whatever of these two aircrafts thoughSir but new J-11 D is far more advance than any other jet economy is the issue other wise we should get 100 of those instead of J-10 B
Sir we need 450 Jets and 270 JF-17 and 100 F-16 and 100 J-11 D should be the way forwardI agree completely and would prefer J-11 over J-10. a heavy twin engine jet can serve as missile and bomb platform but will require radical change in PAF thinking.. I disagree with inducting 100s of whatever of these two aircrafts though
instead inducting few for stop gap until J-31 becomes a reality .