4x ESSM missiles in different canisters, the pic showed them.
There are few things which I will disagree with your conclusion. First thing 93 to 93B is sure a good jump for PRC but to say that it jumped to older LA class to new LA class is not justified considering the relative changes in between. Simply because no one knows clear cut capabilities of nuke subs. Every boat type is unique and there is nothing that can demonise any boat from any country. J 20 is interior against F22 as Indian Russian jv plane is. It is as simple as that. Apart from bomb carrying capability I don't see ours and yours standing against them anywhere else. Whether its about stealth, tracking and engaging or maximum supercruise, they win hands down. When talking about 55 against Zumwalt class, please first reach the level of their currently in service new AB destroyers and Ticos. Then only you can work the techs which are imployed in Zumwalt. As for as ours concerning frankly ours is still not at the level of your 52Cs in capability terms although it may cross it in next 6 months to 1 year period. I would like to say that in my opinion INDIA should maintain a distance between us and US. They are technologically advanced but not to be believed. Thanks.
Yes I agree with all the points which you mentioned. But you are forgetting one simple fact that vertical launch capability is must for SSNs nowdays due to variety of arsenal available in their store. And pumpjet propulsion is indeed good tech to have but it is only one among such high end techs on which China is getting its hands slowly slwoly.
Where am I denying whatever China has accomplished till now. What I am trying to explain is that there is no need compare different countries boats. There are mainly two things which affect it one the reason or purpose for which nuke sub was made. Second mission. What I understand that US subs mission is to fast attack and 2nd to support carrier ops. While in case of china its main purpose is to support SSBN and 2nd to support carrier ops. As I said earlier in a nuke submarine vertical launch and pumpjet are good techs to have but they are only two limited features. There are many more techs which are incorporated in nuke subs. Regarding who has is it in active service, well almost all active users except India have access to pumpjet propulsion system. Royal navy since 1973-74. French since 1997. Russian navy since 2008-09. US since 1989.
I understand the concept of this tech dear. I have only one query wheather These missile can be fired together. Anyway thanks for the pic although on my end only 1st pic is visible, rest are showing sina blog site address with its logo in background. If anyone can help me in reading standard chinese languge, it will be a great help. Any link where English to Chinese or Chinese to Hindi translation is available will do. Thanks anyway.
I am not surprised any longer of your low IQ. as moron you constantly refuse to learn that I don´t want to be called as vietcong.That Vietcong is a joke, the gap will only widen as time passes. If Vietcongs are afraid to act militarily on the oil rig issue at the current state. You think they will act after we achieve a blue water navy? Get used to it and watch how our islands pop up in SCS
No, naval battle in open waters is not our strength. I guess we will return to the old tactic: ambush.You can certainly engage us into a naval battle if you want, just like 1974.
All okay for me, maybe sina blog's pics forbid foreign access.
It's OKay, without PLAN fleet formation we still have the Navy military port pic, it's open for public access .
3x 052C in the PLAN military port
CCL cells do provide greater flexibility in Terms of missile carrying capacity.All okay for me, maybe sina blog's pics forbid foreign access.
In above post, i explained ESSM can not fire together coz only share a single exhaust channel for 4x ESSM missiles.
Using Google translate on-line.
China CCL layout
