Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, we would have. What the airlines are doing now is understandably PRECAUTIONARY. Do you understand that word?Would the US have "waited for data" if it were COMAC planes that crashed?
Except on this forum, grounding a model of an aircraft DOES NOT constitute -- even by implication -- that there is something technically flawed with that model.On the morning of 6 July 2013,...
The final report into the crash was released on 24 June 2014.
Yup...What else are there? Airbus ain't cutting it, and your China still has a looooooooooooooong way to go in the international market. YOU can always walk, drive, rail, or swim.Crap Made in USA, what else?
Yup...What else are there? Airbus ain't cutting it, and your China still has a looooooooooooooong way to go in the international market. YOU can always walk, drive, rail, or swim.
Lol.. you think B737 max 100% made in USA? And you think China can't made those things? It's more of marketing. And at least those engine are inspected by hard-working Chinese and not fat lazy fat American worker who will give a shabby work.You mean the COMAC C919 with junk avionics from Rockwell Collins and junk Engine from PW? Or ARJ21 with junk avionics from Rockwellcollins and Junk Engines from GE?
I will not pity u. B737 max is crap and airliner and victim shall sue Boeing to bankrupt.Yes, we would have. What the airlines are doing now is understandably PRECAUTIONARY. Do you understand that word?
But what professionals should not do is jump to conclusion while waiting for data. A Class A mishap is when there is $1mil or greater of property and/or lives loss. A Class A mishap can take months or even yrs to conclude that a particular engineering subsystem is at fault or a design flaw was missed or pilot errors or combination of factors.
For example...Asiana Flight 214 crashed on Jul 2013 and the investigation concluded on Jun 2014.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214
Except on this forum, grounding a model of an aircraft DOES NOT constitute -- even by implication -- that there is something technically flawed with that model.
Pilot errors are ruinous to the reputation of individuals and the airline company that employs the pilots, and with the charge of 'pilot error', other pilots in that company can be tainted as well because of the hint that the quality of personnel is less than peers.
Engineering or design flaws are financially costly to airlines and manufacturers. It is often disruptive to travel as the airliners have to reschedule flights and to take affected aircrafts offline.
But trolls in this thread are not interested in being reasonable.
So.....Yes, we would have. What the airlines are doing now is understandably PRECAUTIONARY. Do you understand that word?
But what professionals should not do is jump to conclusion while waiting for data. A Class A mishap is when there is $1mil or greater of property and/or lives loss. A Class A mishap can take months or even yrs to conclude that a particular engineering subsystem is at fault or a design flaw was missed or pilot errors or combination of factors.
For example...Asiana Flight 214 crashed on Jul 2013 and the investigation concluded on Jun 2014.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214
Except on this forum, grounding a model of an aircraft DOES NOT constitute -- even by implication -- that there is something technically flawed with that model.
Pilot errors are ruinous to the reputation of individuals and the airline company that employs the pilots, and with the charge of 'pilot error', other pilots in that company can be tainted as well because of the hint that the quality of personnel is less than peers.
Engineering or design flaws are financially costly to airlines and manufacturers. It is often disruptive to travel as the airliners have to reschedule flights and to take affected aircrafts offline.
But trolls in this thread are not interested in being reasonable.
The only thing you and your Chinese friends are good at is trolling. I stand by my record about this subject on this forum. It has been CONSISTENT since '09 that I have always advocated people to hold off their opinions until the investigation is complete. Waiting for information, especially technical information, have NEVER been you guys' strong suit. Simply put, you guys troll brains cannot process such sophisticated knowledge.So.....
what you gonna do about China grounding its entire fleet of 737 Max(and likely cancelling any remaining orders), as well as leading others to do the same:
And no, I'm only interested in the end result of the discussion here- and that is knowing what are you gonna do about it.
Thanks.
Rather than Gambit attacking people online; he should have a constructive discussion where people want to learn more about how things work; and as I mentioned earlier it was an honest question with no preconceived notions about US made products. I'm not here to pick fights as it is not my cup of tea.
Why does the MCAS engage at take-off or landing automatically? Seems to me like shoddy engineering. Engineers should be fired. This should have been fixed after the first crash
2nd crash of the same model in a year. Do any of our airlines operate this model?
So China is also making junk - as you said your self 737 is all Junk?Lol.. you think B737 max 100% made in USA?
Why you want to inspect junk? Inspecting junk doesn't make it non junk … a junk will remain junk no matter how much the hard working slave labor of China inspects them.And you think China can't made those things? It's more of marketing. And at least those engine are inspected by hard-working Chinese and not fat lazy fat American worker who will give a shabby work.