China All Su-35 news

[ChineseTiger1986]

With all due respect, where do you get your information? What proof do you have that the J-10B has ‘better avionics”? Define what better airframe means and how is the J-10 better in air to ground when for one you have no combat record to prove it, two, you have no data to support the J-10B has better avionics, three the SU-35 has a combat proven targeting pod, and lastly you yourself acknowledged that the SU-35 has better payload and range which is a major factor for a good strike aircraft.

We got fed up by the constant BS from your media, you better to stay away from us.

They even spread the lie about how China cannot build the arresting cable of the aircraft carrier, this really shows how credible they are.

 

[zzzz]

The first comparison is valid, but the second comparison is dull, try B-2 Spirit and Su-27.

BTW, saying China needs S-400 is truly BS.

Why dull, compare range and payload of TU-95 and F-22, decades ahead in tech according to your logic

We can compare prices also. Trident missile indeed cost much more than Spike, that actually shows how much it more complicated. Now lets compare price of S-400 system and price of your anti-ballistic missile

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Why dull, compare range and payload of TU-95 and F-22, decades ahead in tech according to your logic

We can compare prices also. Trident missile indeed cost much more than Spike, that actually shows how much it more complicated. Now lets compare price of S-400 system and price of your anti-ballistic missile

The trick of our anti-ballistic missile is mainly about the EKV warhead, if we can make this thing cheaper than your S-400, then this is indeed not a good sign for Russia.

 

[zzzz]

The trick of our anti-ballistic missile is mainly about the EKV warhead, if we can make this thing cheaper than your S-400, then this is indeed not a good sign for Russia.

I think latest Patriot sytem cost even more than S-400. That surely proves that US tech even more behind than Russian in comparison to Chinese technological achievments

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

I think latest Patriot sytem cost even more than S-400. That surely proves that US tech even more behind than Russian in comparison to Chinese technological achievments

Their anti-ballistic missile defence is indeed ahead of Russia, they have developed the EKV during the 1980s, while Soviet Union had a different approach in regard of the ABMD, it is to detonate a nuclear bomb in the exoatmosphere when the ICBM is getting closer, but this method is extremely inefficient and suicidal.

USA believed they were the best in term of the anti-missile/anti-satellite technology, that's why they didn't progress that much since the 1980s, until in 2007, they just discovered that China now possessed the similar technology or even better, and the ICBM interception contest of 2010 further proves that China is moving ahead of them.

 

[zzzz]

Their anti-ballistic missile defence is indeed ahead of Russia, they have developed the EKV during the 1980s, while Soviet Union had a different approach in regard of the ABMD, it is to detonate a nuclear bomb in the exoatmosphere when the ICBM is getting closer, but this method is extremely inefficient and suicidal.

Soviet Union and Russia had more than one approach in regard to ABM. There are nuclear as well as conventional anti-ballistic missiles exist. And this method actually more efficient, detonating near incoming missile much easier than trying to hit it kinetically, that results in much higher kill ratio. But China never managed to develop such technology. Why is that? Obviously because you need to launch not just empty missile but misslile with payload. And this method requires much more advanced level of technology. Pity, yeah?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Soviet Union and Russia had more than one approach in regard to ABM. There are nuclear as well as conventional anti-ballistic missiles exist. And this method actually more efficient, detonating near incoming missile much easier than trying to hit it kinetically, that results in much higher kill ratio. But China never managed to develop such technology. Why is that? Obviously because you need to launch not just empty missile but misslile with payload. And this method requires much more advanced level of technology. Pity, yeah?

Well, you would basically kill yourself with those radioactive fallout above your atmosphere.

That's why both US and China chose the kinetic warhead over this suicidal method.

At the time of USSR, the supercomputing technology simply can't compare to today's, that's why it is almost impossible for them to achieve the pinpoint accuracy of the kinetic weapons.

 

[zzzz]

Well, you would basically kill yourself with those radioactive fallout above your atmosphere.

That's why both US and China chose the kinetic warhead over this suicidal method.

At the time of USSR, the supercomputing technology simply can't compare to today's, that's why it is almost impossible for them to achieve the pinpoint accuracy of the kinetic weapons.

Well i said there are anti-ballistic missiles with conventional payload exist in Russia. And BTW if missile have a payload it doesnt mean that it cannt hit target kinetically or it is not accurate. Having payload just an additional guarantee of destroyng the target.

 

[pzkilo]

Big shame. China wants russian jet fighter (yet again).. That too which india rejected.. LoL

too young too simple, sometimes naive

 

[DelhiDareDevil]

This also convinces me that, JF-17 is not a good jet, as China who co produces them, is shunning JF-17 from day one too over Russian jets and its own better jets.

 

[soldierofallah]

Hahaha it’ll only be a matter of time till the chinease have their own version by copying it.

 

[tvsram1992]

Yeah, with the exception of the J-11B, J-15, J-10B. Oh and don't forget the 5th generation fighter.

heights of wet dreams...Su35 will be inferior to Chinese 4th gen aircrafts ... evry 1 make a note of it .

 

[retaxis]

Only thing war ever tests is credibility...China was a weak nation with no ecnonomy ( half of Indians economy in 62) but war fighting spirit allowed the chinese to destroy the Indians in war. Remember friends of the world..to fight china is to either wipe them out with nuclear weapons or fight the most blood thirsty war you can ever imagine.

 

[tvsram1992]

Only thing war ever tests is credibility...China was a weak nation with no ecnonomy ( half of Indians economy in 62) but war fighting spirit allowed the chinese to destroy the Indians in war. Remember friends of the world..to fight china is to either wipe them out with nuclear weapons or fight the most blood thirsty war you can ever imagine.

same applies for every nuclear country... The only mistake we made in 1962 was underestimation and lack of preparedness, if we had done preemptive strike like what pakistan did in 1971, we would clearly have an upper hand . Nehru thought we could have easily won as we drove out french and dutch .

 

[conworldus]

If I were mod I would close this thread of fake news.