China All Su-35 news

[Akasa]

Any country that has Polar Satellite Launch technology can shoot down a satellite. It is not 'cutting edge'

India hasn't. In fact, any country except for US, Russia, China, hasn't.

---------- Post added at 09:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:36 AM ----------

CHINESE MEMBERS IN THIS FORUM "WE HAVE BETTER TECHNOLOGY THAN RUSSIA, WE BUILD OUR OWN PLANES WE HAVE OUR OWN MISSILES WHICH ARE BETTER THAN RUSSIA'S"

CHINESE GOVT:" RUSSIA PLEASE GIVE US Su35, S 400 SINCE OUR SYSTEM SUCKS"

When in reality:

RUSSIAN NEWS: WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AS IF CHINA WANTS TO BUY OUR STUFF, EVEN WHEN THEY HAVEN'T EVEN MENTIONED IT, BECAUSE WE KNOW OUR INDUSTRY IS FALLING BEHIND AND WON'T HAVE GREAT COMPETITION WITH THEIR STUFF.

 

[isro2222]

Big shame. China wants russian jet fighter (yet again).. That too which india rejected.. LoL

 

[Zabaniyah]

Big shame. China wants russian jet fighter (yet again).. That too which india rejected.. LoL

Since when?

 

[Bobby]

Also, I can pull out some OLD CRAPs!!!!!


1. Russia: " China to buy 50 SU-33 from Russia".

China to Buy Su-33 Carrier-Based Fighters from Russia?

Proven bullsh!t, China already has J-15 which is better than SU-33.


2. China to buy more Kilo subs from Russia!

I dont even need to provide link for this one. Once again bullsh!t as usuall!



Want me to say more?

---------- Post added at 05:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:37 AM ----------




india does NOT even have the capability to send a bug into space.



Yet funny thing is that India "plan" to land the moon.

Here:

India plants flag on Moon ? The Register

We leave bugs for Chinese to eat.....Go read about Chandrayan and Satellite launching capabilities of India before demonstrating your intellect.

 

[isro2222]

@ zabania u can search g0ogle. i got no time as am not 50 cent army.. Tomarrow its my office day. internet is not my office unlike 50 cent army.. By the way super sukhoi30mki is nearly an su-35.. http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-photos-multimedia/159742-russian-air-force-sukhoi-su-35-a.html

 

[Jade]

You can launch them, but you can't catch them at the pinpoint accuracy.

ICBM reentry vehicle: Up to 14,000km/h
Satellite in low earth orbit: 29,000km/h

Projectile - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Heck it is travelling faster than an ICBM, you can't even catch an ICBM, let alone something faster than this.

---------- Post added at 04:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:14 AM ----------



Yeah, so we have performed a live test for you by shooting two ICBM missiles simultaneously just in two years ago.

China shoots down ICBM mid-course, Anti-ballistic missile intercept a success - YouTube

The technology to shoot satellites has been there since cold war. It is nothing 'cutting edge'

Given the technology for shooting down satellites has been around since the Cold War, it is hard to see the technological imperative for countries such as China to conduct such tests. While Beijing may have made a political statement (for good or bad) with its 2007 test, if it remains committed to the peaceful use of space then it is hard to understand the advantage of shooting down further satellites. Indeed, with the U.S made Vanguard 1 still in orbit since launch in 1958, one has to wonder why China feels compelled to shoot down satellites that are several decades younger. The debris caused by such tests is a major risk for other space users and given its potential to upset the prospects for a space weapons treaty, it seems evident that China should refrain from further anti-satellite launches.

The whole articles is below

Nukes of Hazard Blog - Blog

 

[Broccoli]

Is there any other source for this news? So far only that site has reported it.

 

[Akasa]

Big shame. China wants russian jet fighter (yet again).. That too which india rejected.. LoL

This is Russian news reporting unsubstantiated stuff, again, like they did with the Su-33 (we all know how that turned out).

 

[j20blackdragon]

Who the hell needs Su-35 when you can choose from a selection like this?

 

[S10]

Next thing you know, Russians will be saying we'll buy their T-50 and some Indians will get an orgasm out of that.

Meanwhile, we'll do our own thing.

 

[Akasa]

Next thing you know, Russians will be saying we'll buy their T-50 and some Indians will get an orgasm out of that.

Meanwhile, we'll do our own thing.

Just like how they claimed their T-50 was better than the F-22 and J-20.

---------- Post added at 05:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:42 PM ----------

Who the hell needs Su-35 when you can choose from a selection like this?

All of them are incorporated with AESA, radar absorbent material, composites, MAW, next generation electronics, and new cockpits, the same upgrades seen on the Su-35BM and European fighters.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Sometimes in order to show solidarity , you buy stuff you don't need but it might be useful on Border with India

 

[zzzz]

I think S-400 will be a good seller in countries of Middle East and Southeast Asia, but China's EKV/MKV technology is decades ahead of this.

Saying China can't build the SAM like S-400 is simply saying like US can't build a frigate.

As for Su-35, it is just an upgraded Su-27, no thanks, it is not useful for us at all.

Thats like saying US Trident technology decades ahead of Israeli Spike missiles

Or Russian TU-95 tech decades ahead of US F-22

Stupidity beyond belief

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Thats like saying US Trident technology decades ahead of Israeli Spike missiles

Or Russian TU-95 tech decades ahead of US F-22

Stupidity beyond belief

The first comparison is valid, but the second comparison is dull, try B-2 Spirit and Su-27.

BTW, saying China needs S-400 is truly BS.

 

[ptldM3]

China has no interests in SU-35.

Reasons??

1. J-10B is already in mass production and it is better than SU-35. J-10B has AESA radar, much better avonics, better airframe, and much smaller RCS. J-10B's A2G is also better! The only thing SU-35BM has an edge is payload and range.

With all due respect, where do you get your information? What proof do you have that the J-10B has ‘better avionics”? Define what better airframe means and how is the J-10 better in air to ground when for one you have no combat record to prove it, two, you have no data to support the J-10B has better avionics, three the SU-35 has a combat proven targeting pod, and lastly you yourself acknowledged that the SU-35 has better payload and range which is a major factor for a good strike aircraft.