What's new

China All Su-35 news

And being that its China thats claiming that India is "occupying" their land, its not India who started the dispute here...

Actually you did, when you backstabbed us in 1959 by hosting our largest separatist group.

Before that, there were no serious issues in the China-India relationship.
 
. .
China is the biggest trading partner of all those countries. :P And there is no open conflict with any country

Right...but does that change the nature of the dispute?

India on the other hand is still fighting militants and insurgents, and has been having military conflict with its neighbours up till recent times. Even up till 2008 with the Mumbai attacks.

So now you're going to blame the Mumbai attacks as being an act of aggression on our part and not retaliation? Almost like we brought this upon ourselves?

wonderful logic....what lenghths you are going to, to prove a point that doesnt make sense...

You guys are getting smacked by everyone around you, and you're pointing fingers at China? 五十步笑百步。

Pipe down the aggressive rhetoric...Its getting a bit childish now
 
.
images

:welcome: to EARTH....

About as funny as your Chief scientists claiming that India has superior ballistic missile technology compared to China.
 
. .
India was "gifted" their country at the behest of Britain.

India never fought for it, in fact India did not even exist before Britain united the princely states.

You mean gifted as China which if it was not for the west would have the name of Japan written all over it by now.
 
.
Disputes are won by those that have diplomatic, historical, and military superiority.

None of which you possessed back then, or even now.

well then i guess we have enough to hold south tibet and to have broken your all weather friend in half (where were you btw when that happened, such friend you are ehh?)
 
.
Pipe down the aggressive rhetoric...Its getting a bit childish now

Wow you're calling other people childish, when it's you who is resorting to personal attacks? (As shown above).

Quite hypocritical of you.
 
. .
India never fought for it, in fact India did not even exist before Britain united the princely states.

you HAVE no idea....what you are writing ....never write this again....you are just making fun of your knowledge.....lol

Chandragupta_Maurya_Empire.gif


^^^^ BHARAT , one more name of India....if you do not know....in 300 B.C.

Maurya_Dynasty_in_265_BCE.jpg


^^^ India unde rAshoka.....265 B.C.

chandragupt was a slave ...who became king under guidance and training of chanakya , whose dream was to join whole Bharat(India) again.... under one king......
 
.
You mean gifted as China which if it was not for the west would have the name of Japan written all over it by now.

Wrong. Like I said, Japan attacked China a full 10 years before anyone else in the world joined in.

And they had already been almost completely pushed out of China, before America dropped the bombs.

And for your information, Japanese have always written with Han characters. They even call it "Kanji", which literally means Han characters.
 
.
America certainly didn't care about China when they started invading Japan. It was in their own interests. As for India you didn't even fight for your own country. Britain let you go because they were too busy getting pwned by Germany.

poor tenali thinking.........

do search abt some indian history b4 writing...i hope u r sure abt ur history...
 
. .
Not the same at all. India asking for help only benefits India as you would have been at war by yourself. America and China were both at war with Japan, and benefited both.

Your statement contrasts your previous point,which stated we rely on other countries. Now if we are with war against China why would anyone help us, because it is not in their interests.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom