antonius123
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,962
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Then STFU about it. You know nothing about aviation anyway.
It is you old boy you are caught make a lot of WRONG claims, unable to answer many questions aimed to you.
Wrong.
The reason why the material is called an 'absorber' is because it it EM transparent TO SOME DEGREE. Not 100%. But only enough to pass the impinging signal through the surface. If it is not EM transparent to a certain degree it would reflect like any other 'normal' surface and would not be called an 'absorber'.
You do not know what the hell you are talking about.
Owwhh ..U TOTALLY WRONG!
Partially transparent means: the part of EM wave still able to go through the material!, not trapped inside the material as your stupid thought.
What SMS refer as transparent is the EM Wave piercing the material, not trapped inside as what your thinking.
See .. again you are demonstrating idiocy here
Gambit! when will you stop misleading readers by pretending as undisputed aviation expert but bursting MISCONCEPTION??
You are busted again for uncountable times here!
Source for this.
You have no clue about this?
You cant find anything to criticize about this?Finally...You got something right...
Then tell us why.Yes there are. But am willing to bet you do now know why.
Then STFU about the J-20. You do not know anything about aviation anyway.
It is you old boy you are caught make a lot of WRONG claims, unable to answer many questions aimed to you.