ptldM3
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 5,586
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
Who said the Pakfa fuselage is round? I said the PAkfa's uneven air intake creates almost 90 degree tunels; check again the picture I've brought to you and friends many times.
‘almost 90 degrees’ wow. Talk about having no moral standards. You first were arguing that there is only one type of corner reflector and that was the 90 degree corner reflector but when you are talking about the pak-f you start to bend the rules, all of the sudden there are none 90 degree corner reflectors.
Also, where is your answer to my response to your WRONG claim about "Cone has no moving parts"?
The post right above yours. Post #2639 to be specific. And this is the same guy that accuses other of having problems with reading comprehension.
Are you drunk?
This is what you claimed:
After I busted you, then you want to correct?? cannot
Try reading the entire thing next time. This is what you quoted, the highlighted part is what you purposely emitted.
ptldM3 said:Word for you, a cone intake has no moving parts, your source is talking about an intake ramp. A cone intake, if it is adjustable, has all it moving parts hidden inside the aircraft. This is just more reason as to why you should never be taken seriously.
And who said A cone intake retracting will not contribute to RCS ?? what a silly joke from clueless person
Put your money were your mouth is and provide a source. We know how an inlet ramp can potentially increase RCS, but please explain how a inlet cone would increase RCS if it were to either retract inwards or outwards.