Daneshmand
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,109
- Reaction score
- 43
- Country
- Location
I really support that. Look at Iraq spend billions on hardware that they didn't recieve the critical one of them, now even if they do they should be downgraded!! it's your money yet they tell what you should have what not you should have. See in Iraq we can bring some 60s tech from friend countries then rebuild it that's better than spend your money on crap from any nation all of them play gods on you, give you their crap for your precious money we in Iraq should stop that BS and let start from the beginning that's our fate.
one rafale equal two times of it's weight gold that's really a big BS. the money for one rafale we can biuld many
houses for poor people many hospitals better infrastractures!!!.
drone with canopy
Iraq made a mistake. They should have gone for Su-35 which was cheaper and yet superior to F-16. And they would have been delivered as Russians did deliver Su-25 and are about to delivering Mi-28. But I doubt you will ever see those F-16's.
India is co developing with Russia for converting T 50 in to FGFA.It is a JV program and both India and Russia will share the tech equally and also.money.This is not a ToT arrangement like Su 30MKI .
Iran can buy this system from Russia.But I dont know much about your Aerospace industry for assembling this.
Though Iran is a late-comer to aerospace technologies compared to India, but Iran will be capable of assembly and partial production if given the chance.
Brother please visit the link below about
" New Delhi and Moscow finalise a $6 billion deal to co-develop an FGFA with capabilities tailor-made for India"
Russia can't deliver on Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft: IAF | Business Standard News
The history of Russian projects are all such. Full of delays and problems. Mostly because, Russians developing these techs had do so with much lesser funding and depending lesser on international markets than the West. But generally, at the end Russians have usually been successful to varying degrees.
First of all Russians are not trustworthy, why should we trust a tested country twice?
It's not gonna happen, they wouldn't sell it or cooperate with Iran in this field.
And finally I prefer to see our money spent on demestic project instead of seeing Iran being tied to foreigners.
No country is trustworthy in international relationship. Because in international relations, we are not talking about two buddies or about a girl friend and boy friend in love. It is all about national interests. If Iran's national interests dictates that a deal be pushed for, then all these matters of past become irrelevant. Iran has a huge problem with Russia operationalizing Bushehr. But now it has signed a contract for more Bushehrs with the same Russian company. There is no "hard feeling" in relations between countries. Only the interest at hand.
Yes, money should be poured into national projects. That is very important. But these are not exclusive to each other. The money that Iran spends on national projects are Rial, printed by Iran's government itself. The money for such international agreement is usually dollar or another hard currency. Iran has to spend its hard currency somewhere. Why not on acquiring and buying technology? Even if it has to pay 10 times the price. Don't you agree?
Hasn't the Iranian parliament banned the purchasing of foreign military hardware?
No. Actually most of Iran's hardware are of foreign origin, even most of locally produces ones are copies of those. It is actually the United Nation Security Council resolution which has banned Iran from importing and exporting such materials. But then Russia has a permanent seat there and can interpret these resolutions as it sees fit for itself.
with a price of 100mil + per unit , Iran simply can't afford them.
Iran is a very rich country and can afford such matters. The problem is not financial but political. After all, Iran is the one of the least indebted nations on planet. Compare it to Turkey which has hundreds of billions of dollars in debt.