Talon
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- May 31, 2016
- Messages
- 1,741
- Reaction score
- 16
- Country
- Location
These are actually Zarrars..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are actually Zarrars..
For 1000th time, please stop spreading this narrative.F-16s have no such condition,they can fly wherever PAF wants and they can be posted wherever PAF wants, example being deployment of F-16 units during last year's standoff to different air bases.
This is a misleading information spread by Indians and Pakistanis are falling for it like always.
The only restriction that is confirmed is Chinese are not allowed to come close to F16s on ground.
F-7s will retire only when CCS stops using them.
If Sohail Aman was still chief then you could say F-7s will retire by 2025,no disrespect for the current chief but Sohail Aman had a separate vision.
I thought terms are always secret of deals with US but even if its true did it have any affect? At the end we are getting more equipment for F-16s.So imho we are cool as long as Chinese dont come close to the F-16.Did you happen to read this news? @araz No doubt PAF and Pakistan can do whatever they want with F-16 but there exist agreements which govern the use/movement of F-16's
State Department Reprimanded Pakistan for Misusing F-16s, Document Shows
A TOP AMERICAN DIPLOMAT sent a written reprimand to the chiefs of the Pakistani air force in August accusing them of misusing U.S.-supplied F-16 fighter jets and jeopardizing their shared security, according to documents obtained by U.S. News
Addressed to the head of the Pakistani air force, Air Chief Marshal Mujahid Anwar Khan, the letter began by relaying the State Department's confirmation that Pakistan had moved the F-16s and accompanying American-made missiles to unapproved forward operating bases in defiance of its agreement with the U.S. Using diplomatic language, Thompson, who has since left government, warned the Pakistanis that their behavior risked allowing these weapons to fall into the hands of malign actors and "could undermine our shared security platforms and infrastructures."
https://www.usnews.com/news/world-r...n-in-august-for-misusing-f-16s-document-shows
Block 72 is cheapest in it's category, we have all infrastructure to handle F-16sYou guys are forgetting that the Block 50/52 are no longer being produced. Either the PAF goes for used airframes or goes for new 72's which is a VERY costly route.
Any info how much it unit cost for F16 70 or 72 in 2020Block 72 is cheapest in it's category, we have all infrastructure to handle F-16s
Block 72 is cheapest in it's category, we have all infrastructure to handle F-16s
Unfortunately not, however from past deals id estimate anywhere from 100m to 125mAny info how much it unit cost for F16 70 or 72 in 2020
In congress presented cost of F35 was around 85 billion for 2020. Then F16 70/72 will less then this.Sure, theres no denying that.
Unfortunately not, however from past deals id estimate anywhere from 100m to 125m
In congress presented cost of F35 was around 85 billion for 2020. Then F16 70/72 will less then this.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1X81I5
F16 is also produced in large numbers, it may be cheaperYes but, the F-35 benefits from massive economies of scale. The Block 70/72 viper does not. Hence why its costlier.
F16 is also produced in large numbers, it may be cheaper
Is PAF open to accept more Mirage IIIs & Vs from ex-operators for using them as spares and even to upgrade some for the strike roles?
Although we have JF-17s that is will be the backbone of PAF.
Apparently seems to be dead deal, Reason unknownaren’t we getting mirage V from Egypt?