araz
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 9,291
- Reaction score
- 81
I think we have discussed this earlier. The problem with the SU35 is integration of a whole new set of armaments and spares whi h will be cost prohibitive. Now the support for J10C/ J11/16 is the fact that there is commonality in weapons and engines which makes life a lot easier for maintenance. This would not be the case for the SU which I absolutely and positively love. Now if we had a chinese AESA and fire control Radar in the SU , i do not think there would be much hesitation on the part of PAF to buy it. But otherwise there maybe better options available. The priority in my view is on HOBS, and HMCSs for our current platforms which will make them even more lethal.I believe any discussion of interim fighter is moot at this point. Max resources seem to be going towards Navy. If one wants to 'follow' the logic of professionals in the armed forces, then the writing is on the wall. The naval threat exceeds even what IAF presents to land forces.
The only thing I find strange is the lack of (public) attention to the naval arm of PAF. It is my hope and prayer that once other naval assets are sorted out, the threat presented by Indian naval fighters will be considered. And my favorite for this role is Su-35. May Allah Help us and Guide us towards the right path. Aameen.
A