What's new

Can China replace the US as a research hegemon?

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

Can China replace the US as a research hegemon?

October. 26 2022
TRTworld

Five measures chart the rise of Chinese influence in global research.

China could surpass the US and the EU to become the dominant voice in global research, according to a new report published this month by research technology company Digital Science.

The analysis– conducted by Digital Science CEO Daniel Hook and VP of Research Futures Simon Porter – coincided with the Chinese Communist Party’s Congress, in which China’s political and economic power was in the spotlight.

But what about its strength in the research domain?

Dr Hook and Dr Porter proposed five key metrics to rank countries’ influence in the world of research – and in each of them, China has either already overtaken its rivals or is close to overtaking them, or has been making a sustained challenge that could see it rise to the top within the next decade or so.

The five metrics, in increasing importance and level of difficulty to achieve, are: percentage of GDP spent on research; Gold Open Access (OA) publication volume; total publication volume; proportion of global citations; and relative global influence.

“If the story of the 20th Century is one of the decline of the power and influence of the West, then the 21st Century tells the story of the ascent of Asia and more specifically China. Indeed, the era in which we live currently, with the cultural and economic dominance of the West, is something of a historical aberration,” the research authors wrote.

Percentage of GDP spent on research

According to the World Bank, Chinese investment in Research and Development (R&D) reached 2.4 percent of GDP in 2020 and is currently second behind the US at 3.45 percent of GDP.

While the US still outspends China in absolute terms, the gap is narrowing between the two with China spending around 20 percent less than the US. And if the Chinese and US economies continue to grow at their current rates – 3.2 percent for China and 1.6 percent for the US – then China would end up spending more than the US on its current research base by 2032 without the need to increase the percentage of GDP invested.

Gold Open Access publication volume

Advanced research economies usually invest in open models of publishing and research sharing, one of them being Gold Open Access (OA), which makes publications freely accessible from the moment of publication. The open content licenses associated with Gold OA – like Creative Commons licenses – also grant wide-ranging exploitation rights.

The UK has been a leader in Gold OA alongside countries like Australia, Brazil and India. And when it comes to the main blocs – China, the EU and the US – China is expected to nudge ahead of the EU this year when it comes to Gold OA volumes, after it overtook the US in 2017.

Total publication volume

One obvious marker of research development is the total volume of publications.

Sustained high-level production tends to require long-term development of research infrastructure, as well as feeder mechanisms like training for undergraduates, PhD students and postdocs. It also necessitates a vibrant research community and international collaborative opportunities.

At the moment, China is expected to overtake the US this year and also supersede the EU in terms of publication volume.

Proportion of global citations

When it comes to being a preeminent research country, one of the most important markers is whether research is good enough to be cited.

When it comes to the global share of citations, China has moved from single digits in 2000 to 13.5 percent within two decades, which is almost 2 percentage points ahead of the EU now. However, it still remains far behind the US, which attracts nearly 31 percent of global citations.

Still, the trend is China has been steadily increasing its share and the US has steadily been declining for more than 20 years.

Relative global influence

EU countries have been the preferred research partner to work with over the last two decades, placing first alongside strong links with other collaborators like the US, UK and China.

While China is behind the EU, US and UK, it is steadily rising on this metric for more than 20 years while others have either flatlined or declined.

The key for China is that once a country achieves high-quality research at scale, it eventually becomes a destination for collaboration and gains influence in the global research network.

China’s progress against all of these metrics is impressive,” Dr Hook said.

“Within just a few years, China’s influence has developed to a point where it is clear that, if it continues on its current path, within a decade it will have surpassed the US and be vying with the EU-27 for global pre-eminence in its ability to influence the research conversation.”

 
.
The west would kill themselves to discredit Xi, but during his last 10 years administration, China did progress in leads and bounds all across the board.
 
.


2022 tables: Institutions​

The 2022 tables are based on Nature Index data from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021.

#InstitutionShare 2020Share 2021Count 2021Change in Adjusted Share 2020-2021*
1Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China1,888.671,963.006,3251.3%
2Harvard University, United States of America (USA)925.43910.932,649-4.1%
3Max Planck Society, Germany794.38782.722,780-4.0%
4French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), France713.31675.694,399-7.7%
5Stanford University, United States of America (USA)637.25606.511,559-7.3%
6Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres, Germany582.72565.072,584-5.5%
7Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), United States of America (USA)526.03533.131,869-1.3%
8University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), China425.45530.202,72021.4%
9University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), China449.73502.501,4448.8%
10Peking University (PKU), China446.96492.691,8237.4%
11Tsinghua University, China394.18472.491,48016.8%
12Nanjing University (NJU), China417.66464.021,0998.2%
13University of Oxford, United Kingdom (UK)459.53452.281,485-4.1%
14The University of Tokyo (UTokyo), Japan461.12447.541,256-5.5%
15Zhejiang University (ZJU), China342.75417.241,02018.6%
16University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (UK)457.10416.691,370-11.2%
17National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States of America (USA)399.22406.701,011-0.8%
18Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), Switzerland379.03395.671,0651.7%
19University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley), United States of America (USA)394.86373.761,247-7.8%
20Fudan University, China291.42366.741,04222.6%
21University of California, San Diego (UC San Diego), United States of America (USA)336.45347.551,0050.6%
22Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU), China296.70343.131,05012.7%
23Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), China269.08339.0891422.8%
24University of Michigan (U-M), United States of America (USA)398.48337.97923-17.4%
25Yale University, United States of America (USA)360.72335.71972-9.3%
26University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), United States of America (USA)339.82335.381,057-3.9%
27University of Pennsylvania (Penn), United States of America (USA)304.86318.918611.9%
28Columbia University in the City of New York (CU), United States of America (USA)331.43314.47978-7.6%
29Cornell University, United States of America (USA)315.36306.51938-5.3%
30Northwestern University (NU), United States of America (USA)314.61302.14715-6.4%
31University of Toronto (U of T), Canada337.23294.66792-14.9%
32Nankai University (NKU), China230.51287.1257921.3%
33University of Washington (UW), United States of America (USA)268.53281.721,0362.2%
34National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore301.99272.79818-12.0%
35Princeton University, United States of America (USA)275.88272.46769-3.8%
36Sichuan University (SCU), China220.61268.6750318.6%
37Kyoto University, Japan267.45263.03734-4.2%
38California Institute of Technology (Caltech), United States of America (USA)294.29262.49831-13.1%
39Johns Hopkins University (JHU), United States of America (USA)292.99255.23793-15.1%
40The University of Chicago (UChicago), United States of America (USA)252.08253.56754-2.0%
41Imperial College London (ICL), United Kingdom (UK)253.95248.73963-4.6%
42Wuhan University (WHU), China207.90243.1654813.9%
43The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin), United States of America (USA)259.06242.68706-8.7%
44Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Russia236.27242.05914-0.2%
45Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), China219.63240.446776.6%
46Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore221.92232.436592.0%
47University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), United States of America (USA)216.48231.886244.3%
48Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL), United States of America (USA)222.56229.256390.3%
49Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland260.31228.37619-14.5%
50Soochow University, China197.10225.9646911.7%
51UCL, United Kingdom (UK)211.20222.609812.7%
52New York University (NYU), United States of America (USA)200.40221.536507.7%
53Shandong University (SDU), China134.27213.1271954.6%
54University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), United States of America (USA)234.40211.43618-12.1%
55Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain217.69209.151,190-6.4%
56Xiamen University (XMU), China194.41206.28427
 
.


2022 tables: Institutions​

The 2022 tables are based on Nature Index data from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021.

#InstitutionShare 2020Share 2021Count 2021Change in Adjusted Share 2020-2021*
1Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China1,888.671,963.006,3251.3%
2Harvard University, United States of America (USA)925.43910.932,649-4.1%
3Max Planck Society, Germany794.38782.722,780-4.0%
4French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), France713.31675.694,399-7.7%
5Stanford University, United States of America (USA)637.25606.511,559-7.3%
6Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres, Germany582.72565.072,584-5.5%
7Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), United States of America (USA)526.03533.131,869-1.3%
8University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), China425.45530.202,72021.4%
9University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), China449.73502.501,4448.8%
10Peking University (PKU), China446.96492.691,8237.4%
11Tsinghua University, China394.18472.491,48016.8%
12Nanjing University (NJU), China417.66464.021,0998.2%
13University of Oxford, United Kingdom (UK)459.53452.281,485-4.1%
14The University of Tokyo (UTokyo), Japan461.12447.541,256-5.5%
15Zhejiang University (ZJU), China342.75417.241,02018.6%
16University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (UK)457.10416.691,370-11.2%
17National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States of America (USA)399.22406.701,011-0.8%
18Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), Switzerland379.03395.671,0651.7%
19University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley), United States of America (USA)394.86373.761,247-7.8%
20Fudan University, China291.42366.741,04222.6%
21University of California, San Diego (UC San Diego), United States of America (USA)336.45347.551,0050.6%
22Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU), China296.70343.131,05012.7%
23Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), China269.08339.0891422.8%
24University of Michigan (U-M), United States of America (USA)398.48337.97923-17.4%
25Yale University, United States of America (USA)360.72335.71972-9.3%
26University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), United States of America (USA)339.82335.381,057-3.9%
27University of Pennsylvania (Penn), United States of America (USA)304.86318.918611.9%
28Columbia University in the City of New York (CU), United States of America (USA)331.43314.47978-7.6%
29Cornell University, United States of America (USA)315.36306.51938-5.3%
30Northwestern University (NU), United States of America (USA)314.61302.14715-6.4%
31University of Toronto (U of T), Canada337.23294.66792-14.9%
32Nankai University (NKU), China230.51287.1257921.3%
33University of Washington (UW), United States of America (USA)268.53281.721,0362.2%
34National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore301.99272.79818-12.0%
35Princeton University, United States of America (USA)275.88272.46769-3.8%
36Sichuan University (SCU), China220.61268.6750318.6%
37Kyoto University, Japan267.45263.03734-4.2%
38California Institute of Technology (Caltech), United States of America (USA)294.29262.49831-13.1%
39Johns Hopkins University (JHU), United States of America (USA)292.99255.23793-15.1%
40The University of Chicago (UChicago), United States of America (USA)252.08253.56754-2.0%
41Imperial College London (ICL), United Kingdom (UK)253.95248.73963-4.6%
42Wuhan University (WHU), China207.90243.1654813.9%
43The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin), United States of America (USA)259.06242.68706-8.7%
44Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Russia236.27242.05914-0.2%
45Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), China219.63240.446776.6%
46Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore221.92232.436592.0%
47University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), United States of America (USA)216.48231.886244.3%
48Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL), United States of America (USA)222.56229.256390.3%
49Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland260.31228.37619-14.5%
50Soochow University, China197.10225.9646911.7%
51UCL, United Kingdom (UK)211.20222.609812.7%
52New York University (NYU), United States of America (USA)200.40221.536507.7%
53Shandong University (SDU), China134.27213.1271954.6%
54University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), United States of America (USA)234.40211.43618-12.1%
55Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain217.69209.151,190-6.4%
56Xiamen University (XMU), China194.41206.28427

pulling a random ranking as usual
 
.
pulling a random ranking as usual
What random ranking ? These are official release, you get upset becos India loser is nowhere to be seen on the list.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
1649774415392-png.833612
 
.
A world ruled by China in the place of USA will be horrific for non-Han-Chinese people.

Even a world with USA without countering parts like China and Russia will be horrific.
 
. .
There is no question in my mind that Chinese young people are significantly ahead of American young people in learning and practicing engineering. On the other hand, the USA welcomes young people from all over the world to learn and practice engineering here, supplementing our talent pool. What I am looking for from a new science and engineering "hegemon" is a breakthrough in a critical technical area that is now limited or roadblocked. For example, cost competitive mass energy storage that would allow intermittent renewable energy sources (solar and wind) to take over from fossil fuels. So far, Asian technical powerhouses, first Japan, then South Korea and Taiwan, and now China, have excelled at perfecting technologies invented and pioneered in the USA. They have not been pioneers themselves, yet. I don't believe China will become a technology pioneer unless it permits "start-up", entrepreneurial-spirited Chinese geniuses to find venture capital and to become wealthy. It doesn't look like Xi Jinping "thought" will support such outcomes.
 
.
There is no question in my mind that Chinese young people are significantly ahead of American young people in learning and practicing engineering. On the other hand, the USA welcomes young people from all over the world to learn and practice engineering here, supplementing our talent pool. What I am looking for from a new science and engineering "hegemon" is a breakthrough in a critical technical area that is now limited or roadblocked. For example, cost competitive mass energy storage that would allow intermittent renewable energy sources (solar and wind) to take over from fossil fuels. So far, Asian technical powerhouses, first Japan, then South Korea and Taiwan, and now China, have excelled at perfecting technologies invented and pioneered in the USA. They have not been pioneers themselves, yet. I don't believe China will become a technology pioneer unless it permits "start-up", entrepreneurial-spirited Chinese geniuses to find venture capital and to become wealthy. It doesn't look like Xi Jinping "thought" will support such outcomes.

I completely agree about this!

One of the reasons is probably East Asian are not risk-takers.

Making a breakthru and changing the world is risky. The thing that East Asian society and government, especially CCP, are unable to accept.

It's already happened in Japan, and it will be repeated in again in China and South Korea.
 
.
There is no question in my mind that Chinese young people are significantly ahead of American young people in learning and practicing engineering. On the other hand, the USA welcomes young people from all over the world to learn and practice engineering here, supplementing our talent pool. What I am looking for from a new science and engineering "hegemon" is a breakthrough in a critical technical area that is now limited or roadblocked. For example, cost competitive mass energy storage that would allow intermittent renewable energy sources (solar and wind) to take over from fossil fuels. So far, Asian technical powerhouses, first Japan, then South Korea and Taiwan, and now China, have excelled at perfecting technologies invented and pioneered in the USA. They have not been pioneers themselves, yet. I don't believe China will become a technology pioneer unless it permits "start-up", entrepreneurial-spirited Chinese geniuses to find venture capital and to become wealthy. It doesn't look like Xi Jinping "thought" will support such outcomes.
Hard to say, I think Wechat, Tik Tok are pretty innovative, actaully young Chinese are very forward looking and open minded, it's US being stuck in meaningless ideology wars.
 
.
Hard to say, I think Wechat, Tik Tok are pretty innovative, actaully young Chinese are very forward looking and open minded, it's US being stuck in meaningless ideology wars.
"pretty" innovative!? "Pretty" lame. Merely incremental over Amazon, Paypal, YouTube, Twitter, etc., etc., etc.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom