What's new

Can China replace the US as a research hegemon?

"pretty" innovative!? "Pretty" lame. Merely incremental over Amazon, Paypal, YouTube, Twitter, etc., etc., etc.
US doesn't have an all in one super app like Wechat, this is way Musk is planning to copy Wechat and make newly purchased twitter into an US version of Wechat.
 
. .
BFD. Wow! What an earth-shattering accomplishment!! An app!!!!
It's the idea that matters, as for innovations, China also made a lot, artificial sun, 2 meters tall super rice... but non is nearly as influential as wechat which changed everyone's life forever in China.
 
. .
China's Achilles' heel is innovation.

Chinese is conformist and hardworking.

It's better to look out of the window to know the time, instead of inventing a watch.

There's already a car and we already build millions of kilometers of road, why do we need something different?

If you are lazy enough to walk to the parking lot, to get your car, I don't know what kind of person you are! So lazy!!!

Mom, I want to make a moving picture! You can already imagine his mom's reaction.

And that's how China kills innovation.


Actually defeating USA military is as simple as snapping fingers.

You just need to take a nap to make billions of USD, or tons of gold.

World hunger can only be solved by not planting any plants on the soil, and killing animals. Definitely, agriculture should be abandoned.

These are innovative guys! And Chinese doesn't know it, but everyone except the Chinese knows it very well.
 
Last edited:
.
Behind the rising influence of Chinese research
What’s driving the growth in Chinese journal articles? And what influences an author’s choice of journal? Here’s what societies and editors need to know.
By Pan Zhang and Zhuoling Liao - June 27, 2022
© istock.com



© istock.com
The research market in China has seen significant growth in recent years, leading to a rapid rise in both article volume and quality. This brings huge opportunities for any journal wishing to publish the world’s leading content. As you consider your publishing strategy, it’s essential to be aware of what’s going on in China and what’s influencing author choice in this increasingly important market.

Growth in volume and quality

As you will likely know only too well, the number of articles originating from China has grown significantly in recent years, rising by over 51% in the period 2016–2020. In terms of annual article output, China surpassed the US back in 2016 and the EU in 2019, according to data in Scopus.

The less known but arguably more important news is the pace at which article quality is developing in China. The quality of Chinese research has at times been viewed as below par. Not anymore. China’s overall Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) rose from 0.89 in 2016 to 1.12 in 2020, meaning that the quality of research published in China is 12% above the world average. (FWCI is the ratio of the total citations actually received by the denominator’s output, and the total citations that would be expected based on the average of the subject field.) Reflecting this growth in quality, Chinese authors are now more likely than ever to publish the world’s “best” content; in 2020, they contributed 29% of the articles published in the world’s top 10% journals (by CiteScore percentile).

As for choice of business model, today, almost a third of articles with a corresponding author from China are published gold open access. Consequently, although China is not necessarily viewed as a country actively advocating for open access, authors are publishing open access in very large numbers, supported by funds of up to 20,000 RMB (about $3,000) per article (in 2020) for appropriate articles. In fact, it is projected that China’s gold open access article volume in 2023 will exceed half of the US’s total article volume, according to Scopus data.
China publications and impact charts



China’s overall Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) rose from 0.89 in 2016 to 1.12 in 2020, meaning that the quality of research published in China is 12% above the world average. Reflecting this growth in quality, Chinese authors are now more likely than ever to publish the world’s “best” content; in 2020, they contributed 29% of the articles published in the world’s top 10% journals (by CiteScore percentile).
Subject focus

In China, Engineering is the top subject area — by considerable margin — in terms of total publication numbers. This is then followed by Materials Science, Computer Science, Physics & Astronomy, and Medicine, which all saw constant growth between 2016 and 2019.
Top 5 subjects in publications in China



This chart shows the top five subjects in Chinese publications from 2016-2020: Engineering, Materials Science, Computer Science, Physics and Astronomy, and Medicine.
Changes to Chinese government research policies

However, other than in medicine, the growth slowed down in 2020. It’s likely that the global pandemic has influenced this trend somewhat, as well as changes to Chinese research and higher education evaluation systems. The latter refers to a 2020 government initiative whereby a Chinese researcher’s contribution (and subsequent funding and career advancement prospects) is judged less on absolute numbers of articles and citations and more on their overall contribution. In the case of basic researchers, for instance, a system of “representative works” has been introduced, whereby only a limited number of a researcher’s or an institution’s most important papers are considered as part of their assessment.

Drivers behind choice of publication

Multiple factors influence a Chinese author’s decision regarding where to publish their research. A survey among Chinese researchers in 2021 showed that journal reputation and journal impact metrics are the top factors considered by Chinese authors.
Factors driving journal choice



The number of authors in Scival is a deduplicated count of Scopus author IDs for all authors on the publications. (Source: SciVal and a survey conducted by Elsevier’s STM Journals China Program team in 2021)
It was particularly notable that Chinese authors have a higher preference to publish articles in journals with Impact Factors, compared to authors from the US and UK. This is likely due to the historical ways in which Chinese researchers have been evaluated for funding and career promotion. Whether the recent changes in government research policies will influence this in a material way remains to be seen.
Submission to Elsevier author pays journals. Note: New Impact Factors are released every July, which can affect the submission behavior from H2 of the year to H1 of the next year.



In a further study on author priorities in China, we see that speed of publication (including peer review) is particularly important. Expectations on speed are higher in China than elsewhere in the world, and slow speed is often a key reason for not submitting to a journal.

Importance of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Journal Ranking

Zhuoling Liao, Elsevier’s China Program Director and co-author of this article, presents at the Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences.


Zhuoling Liao, Elsevier’s China Program Director and co-author of this article, presents at the Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

This focus on impact metrics is, in part, driven by the CAS Journal Ranking system, developed by the National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences (NSLC). The CAS Journal Ranking details the most influential journals by impact metrics and is viewed by Chinese researchers as the go-to list when considering where to publish their articles.
Key recommended journal lists



The CAS Journal Ranking details the most influential journals by impact metrics and is viewed by Chinese researchers as the go-to list when considering where to publish their articles.
In an attempt to avoid what some would regard as the misleading and incomparable nature of Impact Factors across different disciplines, the CAS Journal Ranking demonstrates a journal's impact within its corresponding domain. As an evolving analysis tool, in 2019 the CAS Journal Ranking developed a new indicator to assess a journal’s impact: the Citation Success Index (CSI).
Methodology chart



The CAS Journal Ranking demonstrates a journal's impact within its corresponding domain. As an evolving analysis tool, in 2019 the CAS Journal Ranking developed a new indicator to assess a journal’s impact: the Citation Success Index (CSI).

Unlike the Impact Factor, which depends on the total number of journal citations, the Citation Success Index focuses on the broadness and the shape of citation distributions (including any one-off highly cited articles). For example, The American Statistician owed its high IF of 5.381 in 2018 (and 2/123 ranking) to a few highly-cited articles. Taking this into account, The American Statistician was ranked a low Tier 4 in the 2019 CAS Journal Ranking.

Working in the opposite way, the CAS Early Warning List of International Journals has been created to encourage Chinese researchers not to publish in “undesirable” journals. The relatively limited number of journals included — 64 journals in 2020 and 36 journals in 2021 — are selected according to various factors, including those that operate predatory-like behavior.
Summary

It’s clear that for any journal wanting to publish the best research in their field, attracting and retaining article submissions from China has become increasingly important. With this in mind, it’s important to bear in mind the following:
  • Chinese authors are — or almost certainly will be — increasingly important in terms of the volume output of your journal.
  • The quality of articles from Chinese authors is increasing, with many of the world’s best articles now originating from China.
  • Chinese authors are actively publishing in gold open access journals.
  • Chinese authors have historically had a higher preference to publish articles in journals with Impact Factors, compared to authors from the US and UK, and greatly value publication speed.
  • Chinese authors are influenced by the CAS Journal Ranking, besides Impact Factor.
Implications for your journal

Working with your publisher, we recommend you consider the following:
  • Take the time to understand the author decision-making process in China.
  • Expand your academic network in China and build long-term relationships with key individuals and communities.
  • Ensure editorial board make-up reflects the importance of Chinese content to encourage submissions, enable your journal to be truly internationally collaborative, identify emerging trends from China, and have a pool of reviewers available that are well positioned to review papers.
  • Focus on dedicated China author submission marketing (recognizing the importance of social media channels such as WeChat), including tailored author workshops.
  • Focus editorial and production practices to appeal to a Chinese audience, including practices that prioritize publication speed and, where appropriate, incorporating language editing.
 
.
US doesn't have an all in one super app like Wechat, this is way Musk is planning to copy Wechat and make newly purchased twitter into an US version of Wechat.
Actually, all in one communication program (not apps) existed before WeChat. Myspace is the all in one program that does what today Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Whatsapp does. In fact, the instant messaging version of Myspace is the only thing that survive the post social media expansion.


But if you strictly talking about apps, then yes. US does not have an all in one "Super" apps like WeChat.

On the other hand, Musk wanted to make twitter in a lot of thing and turning it into WeChat is not one of them. What musk wanted is to monetize Twitter, whatever he does with twitter is based on this single idea.
 
.
Innovation is based on needs.

If China doesn't have any needs, curiosity, or dreams.

There will be no innovation.


To know whether China will become a research hegemon is to look at what is the Chinese dream.

If the dream is big and tall, it could be China will become a research hegemon and technologically advanced nation on earth.

If China lacks dreams, and China's dream is to follow someone else dream, China will become a second-class nation.
 
.
China Daily: China surpasses US in frontier research
By ZHANG ZHIHAO | China Daily | Updated: 2021-12-09 07:05

61b17190a310cdd3d81fb118.jpeg


A staff member tests samples of the COVID-19 inactivated vaccine at a vaccine production plant of China National Pharmaceutical Group (Sinopharm) in Beijing, April 11, 2020. [Photo/Xinhua]

China led the world in seven out of 11 research areas this year in terms of active frontier research, surpassing the United States for the first time, according to a report published on Wednesday.

The 2021 Research Fronts report, jointly published by the Institutes of Science and Development of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and global analytics firm Clarivate, identified 171 frontier research topics.

The topics included 110 "hot" and 61 emerging research fronts, which are divided into 11 broad research categories, from physics to clinical medicine. The list is compiled by analyzing data of highly influential and often-cited papers published from 2015 to 2020.

China achieved the highest scores in seven categories of the Research Leadership Index this year: agricultural, plant and animal sciences; ecological and environmental sciences; clinical medicine; chemistry and materials science; mathematics; information science; and economics, psychology and other social sciences.

China ranked second in geosciences, biological sciences and physics, and eighth in astronomy and astrophysics, according to the annual report.

The United States scored highest in four major areas: geosciences; biological sciences; physics; astronomy and astrophysics. It ranked second in the other seven categories.

When ranking an individual country's overall performance across all 11 areas, the United States remains the world's most active researcher, scoring a total of 209.23 points.

China was second with 191.43 points, up from 151.29 points last year. The gap in the Research Leadership Index scores between the two nations is less than 10 percent.

China is only slightly more active than the US in frontier research in clinical medicine, social sciences and information science this year, while the US enjoys a substantial lead in geosciences and biological sciences, as well as astronomy and astrophysics, the report said.

Yang Fan, a researcher at the Institutes of Science and Development of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said a major reason for China's higher rankings is due a great deal to Chinese scientists publishing a large number of highly influential papers on COVID-19.

The papers cover a wide range of topics from genetic information about the virus, to clinical trials of vaccines and drugs, to evaluating the social and psychological impacts of the pandemic, she said.

Gao Hongjun, vice-president of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said the annual report, which is the eighth of its kind, can help scientists and policymakers determine key research topics and trends by tracking emerging specialty areas of research.

Steen Lomholt-Thomsen, chief revenue officer at Clarivate, said the ability to identify emerging specialty areas of research can provide a distinct advantage for those seeking to monitor, support and advance the conduct of research, which is often done with finite resources.

This includes governments, policymakers, publishers, research administrators and commercial companies, he said. "Research fronts enable them to identify key players as potential collaborators and an opportunity to turn published research into a compelling competitive advantage with societal and economic impact," Lomholt-Thomsen said.

Of the 171 research fronts, 81 are led by the US, while China leads global research in 65 fronts. The two countries combined account for 85 percent of all the listed specialist research areas.

Gao Fu, head of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said it is encouraging to see China making such rapid progress in frontier sciences, but people should also keep a clear mind regarding both its accomplishments and shortcomings. "There is still a lot of room for collaboration, especially in regards to basic sciences," Gao said.

 
.

7 charts to explain how China became a threat to US's tech leadership

Seven years after China unveiled its ambitious Made in China 2025 plan to become globally competitive in 10 industries, President Xi is using Communist Party congress this month to redouble efforts

Sam Kim | Bloomberg
Last Updated at October 21, 2022 09:58 IST

Seven years after China unveiled its ambitious Made in China 2025 plan to become globally competitive in 10 industries, President Xi Jinping is using the Communist Party congress this month to redouble efforts to “win the battle in key core technologies.”

His rallying call reflects the intensifying tensions between China and the US, which has tightened the screws in recent years on the transfer of cutting-edge technology to the world’s second-largest economy.

Here are seven charts that illustrate how much China has closed the gap with the US in state-of-the-art technology, and why the Biden administration feels threatened to the point it is dramatically increasing restrictions.

Here are seven charts that illustrate how much China has closed the gap with the US in state-of-the-art technology, and why the Biden administration feels threatened to the point it is dramatically increasing restrictions.

Booming Research
chart


As its economy has boomed, China has relentlessly increased investments in technology in the decades since Deng Xiaoping rekindled the country’s economic opening up in the early 1990s. The country now lags just slightly behind the US in total expenditures on research and development.

Times of economic crisis have been opportunities for China to narrow its gap with the US. After the 2000 dot-com bust and the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, US R&D spending grew at a slower pace or shrank, whereas China kept expanding.

Gross R&D spending for 2021 isn’t available yet from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, but China announced its official investment rose more than 14% to 2.8 trillion yuan ($388 billion) last year, accelerating from 10.2% in 2020. Meanwhile, the US federal budget for R&D fell 2.6% last fiscal year to $165.6 billion, according to the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.

High-Tech Demand Grows
chart



The world’s biggest exporter, China, is also the most aggressive importer of satellites, optical fibers, silicon, laser beams and other high-tech products that underpin the development of advanced technology. China’s share in the global imports of high-tech products has steadily increased in the last decade from 16.3% to 18.6%, according to data from Kim Minwoo, a researcher at the Korea International Trade Association.
Some of that increase is likely due to China’s position as the factory of the world, as it imports high-tech parts for assembly into products such as phones or computers that are then exported.

But the large amount of imported goods also means China is more vulnerable as the US toughens export controls. In particular, China’s high-performance computing -- essential in aerospace, weapons and artificial intelligence development -- may be “severely damaged” if US bans widen further, according to TrendForce.

Supercomputing Status
chart


China surpassed the US in the number of supercomputers in 2016, widening the gap to the most in 2020. But the lead is narrowing as the US increases restrictions on China’s access to advanced devices, according to data from TOP500, a project that tracks trends in high-performance computing.

Supercomputers are used for a variety of purposes from climate forecasts to vaccine development to space exploration. They can also simulate nuclear tests and missile defense and handle large volumes of data used in artificial intelligence development. The new Biden administration restrictions on China exports specifically ban chips that are used in supercomputers and AI.

Supercomputer Speed
chart


The problem is more serious for China when it comes to supercomputer performance. Whereas China struggles to improve speed, the US began to surge ahead last year, at the same time it imposed sanctions on seven Chinese supercomputing firms.

The US cited activities undermining American national-security or foreign-policy interests. Beijing has repeatedly rejected the American claims, saying the moves against Chinese tech firms are aimed at preventing China from surpassing the US.

AI Influence
chart


China’s stagnating supercomputer performance contrasts with the rising number of high-impact AI papers by its researchers, who can rely on data generated from the country’s 1.4 billion-strong population.

China’s academics got a boost in 2017 when the government enshrined the pursuit of global AI leadership by 2030. They focus more on surveillance-related tasks, such as tracking, action recognition and object detection compared with American ones, according to the State of AI Report 2022, by investors Nathan Benaich and Ian Hogarth.

Chip Size
chart



The $550 billion semiconductor industry is the front-line in the tech war between the two countries. China accounted for 17% of global chip production in 2020, a jump from 2% in 2000, while the US share halved from 24% to 12% in the same period, according to South Korea. By 2030, China is forecast to raise its share to 24% while the US slides to 10%, according to a report from the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University, which was published before the latest round of sanctions.

A key scorecard in the competition is progress in downsizing individual transistors for faster and more efficient chips. In July, China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. reportedly developed a Bitcoin-mining chip that was built with 7-nanometer technology, overturning expectations it wouldn’t be able to develop a chip smaller than 10-nanometers due to a US ban on the sale of advanced lithography machines that project patterns on silicon wafers.

Despite that reported success, China is struggling to develop a domestic chip industry, even with the billions of dollars in funding it has thrown at the sector in the past decade.

Startup Money
chart


The US has since widened regulations further limiting the sale of chipmaking tools to Chinese firms, including electronic design automation software key to 3-nm fabrication and beyond.

That is spurring China to accelerate the growth of its homegrown developers. Chinese startups in chipmaking and other key technologies outpaced US ones by about nine times in funding procurement last month, according to data available from Semiconductor Engineering, an industry publication.

“China believes what doesn’t kill you will make you stronger,” said Kwon Seok Joon, author of “Semiconductor War in East Asia” who teaches chip fabrication at Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University. “It’s a war that will be costly for the US as well and intensify further after the congress as Xi ramps up his bid for self-reliance.”

 
.
China also made a lot, artificial sun
Where can we buy it? The world desperately needs non-polluting energy source. A fusion reactor would be China's greatest gift to mankind and all nations will be in forever gratitude to Chinese scientific and technical genius.
 
.
Where can we buy it? The world desperately needs non-polluting energy source. A fusion reactor would be China's greatest gift to mankind and all nations will be in forever gratitude to Chinese scientific and technical genius.
US won't buy them, US is alway putting politics before people's wellbeing


86711e20752f4f1f989abe6813ee7cb5.jpeg

renewable energy.png
 
.

China overtakes the US in terms of research quality, finds study

22 Mar 2022 Laura Hiscott

microscope-in-lab-1184182378-iStock_RyanKing999-Web.jpg


Taking the lead While China has already overtaken the US in terms of the quantity of scientific research, a new study suggests it has caught up in terms of quality too. (Courtesy: iStock/RyanKing999)

The quality of China’s scientific research output exceeded that of the US in 2019. That is according to a new analysis by researchers in the US, which also found that China had already overtaken the European Union in terms of research quality by 2015.

China’s total research output has grown rapidly in recent years, but there has been a widespread belief that the “quality” – judged by the number of citations papers receive – is not as high as other countries. A common measure of a nation’s research quality is the percentage of its papers appearing in the top 1% of the most-cited papers globally. Since citation practices vary widely across disciplines, researchers typically weight the citation data of papers according to their fields, before comparing countries’ scientific output. When comparing field-weighted citation data, the US has a higher percentage of research in the top 1% worldwide than China does.

Although this weighting practice makes sense when comparing papers from different fields, Caroline Wagner of Ohio State University argues that it is not appropriate when comparing the overall research outputs of different countries. Together with Lin Zhang of Wuhan University and Loet Leydesdorff of the University of Amsterdam, Wagner analysed citation data contained in the database Web of Science and used the unweighted data to quantify different countries’ research quality.

They found that 1.67% of papers with Chinese authors were in the top 1% most-cited articles in 2019 compared with 1.62% of papers with US authors.

Wagner believes that China’s rapidly rising scientific impact is due to its large-scale investments in research and development, scientific infrastructure and the mobility of students and scholars. She also points out that government policy has targeted leading areas of research.

“We need to think about scientific capability, not as a race, but as a frontier of knowledge,” Wagner told Physics World. “China is now operating at the frontier, along with several other nations, including the US and a number of European nations, Japan and South Korea.” Wagner is now investigating how the US can exploit new knowledge “no matter where it is developed”.

 
.

Can China replace the US as a research hegemon?

October. 26 2022
TRTworld

Five measures chart the rise of Chinese influence in global research.

China could surpass the US and the EU to become the dominant voice in global research, according to a new report published this month by research technology company Digital Science.

The analysis– conducted by Digital Science CEO Daniel Hook and VP of Research Futures Simon Porter – coincided with the Chinese Communist Party’s Congress, in which China’s political and economic power was in the spotlight.

But what about its strength in the research domain?

Dr Hook and Dr Porter proposed five key metrics to rank countries’ influence in the world of research – and in each of them, China has either already overtaken its rivals or is close to overtaking them, or has been making a sustained challenge that could see it rise to the top within the next decade or so.

The five metrics, in increasing importance and level of difficulty to achieve, are: percentage of GDP spent on research; Gold Open Access (OA) publication volume; total publication volume; proportion of global citations; and relative global influence.

“If the story of the 20th Century is one of the decline of the power and influence of the West, then the 21st Century tells the story of the ascent of Asia and more specifically China. Indeed, the era in which we live currently, with the cultural and economic dominance of the West, is something of a historical aberration,” the research authors wrote.

Percentage of GDP spent on research

According to the World Bank, Chinese investment in Research and Development (R&D) reached 2.4 percent of GDP in 2020 and is currently second behind the US at 3.45 percent of GDP.

While the US still outspends China in absolute terms, the gap is narrowing between the two with China spending around 20 percent less than the US. And if the Chinese and US economies continue to grow at their current rates – 3.2 percent for China and 1.6 percent for the US – then China would end up spending more than the US on its current research base by 2032 without the need to increase the percentage of GDP invested.

Gold Open Access publication volume

Advanced research economies usually invest in open models of publishing and research sharing, one of them being Gold Open Access (OA), which makes publications freely accessible from the moment of publication. The open content licenses associated with Gold OA – like Creative Commons licenses – also grant wide-ranging exploitation rights.

The UK has been a leader in Gold OA alongside countries like Australia, Brazil and India. And when it comes to the main blocs – China, the EU and the US – China is expected to nudge ahead of the EU this year when it comes to Gold OA volumes, after it overtook the US in 2017.

Total publication volume

One obvious marker of research development is the total volume of publications.

Sustained high-level production tends to require long-term development of research infrastructure, as well as feeder mechanisms like training for undergraduates, PhD students and postdocs. It also necessitates a vibrant research community and international collaborative opportunities.

At the moment, China is expected to overtake the US this year and also supersede the EU in terms of publication volume.

Proportion of global citations

When it comes to being a preeminent research country, one of the most important markers is whether research is good enough to be cited.

When it comes to the global share of citations, China has moved from single digits in 2000 to 13.5 percent within two decades, which is almost 2 percentage points ahead of the EU now. However, it still remains far behind the US, which attracts nearly 31 percent of global citations.

Still, the trend is China has been steadily increasing its share and the US has steadily been declining for more than 20 years.

Relative global influence

EU countries have been the preferred research partner to work with over the last two decades, placing first alongside strong links with other collaborators like the US, UK and China.

While China is behind the EU, US and UK, it is steadily rising on this metric for more than 20 years while others have either flatlined or declined.

The key for China is that once a country achieves high-quality research at scale, it eventually becomes a destination for collaboration and gains influence in the global research network.

China’s progress against all of these metrics is impressive,” Dr Hook said.

“Within just a few years, China’s influence has developed to a point where it is clear that, if it continues on its current path, within a decade it will have surpassed the US and be vying with the EU-27 for global pre-eminence in its ability to influence the research conversation.”

Remember Japan in the 1980s? I remember in our school we had an English missionary who was an assistant head master. He had a Grunding Radio in his office and the school purchased a National (Japanese) audio system for sports day and he made such a big hue and cry about it saying the Japanese will never rival British quality or craftsmanship calling them the little men of Asia.

Well where is Japan today?

Point being China is the Japan of rhe 1980’s I predict great things coming out of China.

This post was not sponsored 😂.
 
.
Remember Japan in the 1980s? I remember in our school we had an English missionary who was an assistant head master. He had a Grunding Radio in his office and the school purchased a National (Japanese) audio system for sports day and he made such a big hue and cry about it saying the Japanese will never rival British quality or craftsmanship calling them the little men of Asia.

Well where is Japan today?

Point being China is the Japan of rhe 1980’s I predict great things coming out of China.

This post was not sponsored 😂.

Japan had a population that was a third of the US.

China has a population that is three times the US.

China also comes from a racial stock that dominates the global IQ charts.

C02E2FD4-4EDB-48F5-A911-DA2AFCE9A452.jpeg
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom