What's new

Can add 6 LCA Tejas squadrons in 4-5 years - Parrikar

special

BANNED
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
India
1_img116415123454.jpg


NEW DELHI: India's defence R&D establishment will have to fire on all cylinders to fast-track the meandering Tejas light combat aircraft, which is still not fully operational or combat ready, if it does not want the Narendra Modi government to critically re-examine the entire project.

The Tejas project, in fact, may even get some competition in the light-weight fighter category. Defence minister Manohar Parrikar said "some other single-engine, lighter fighter" other than the home-grown Tejas could also be considered for a "Make in India" project to replace the obsolete MiG-21s.

Restricting the acquisition of expensive twin-engine French Rafale fighters to just 36 for now, instead of the original plan for 126 MMRCA (medium multi-role combat aircraft), Parrikar stressed he was trying to plug operational gaps in airpower by improving serviceability of "heavy-weight" Sukhoi-30MKIs as well as "pushing" the DRDO-HAL combine to deliver Tejas faster.

"Don't compare Rafale, a top-end fighter, to MiG-21s, which we will phase out in about six to 10 years. The replacement for MiG-21s will be Tejas or some other single-engine, lighter aircraft. Tejas ki maar bhi kaafi hai (Tejas packs a punch) and it's much better than a MiG-21, but has certain limitations," said Parrikar.

Though some interpreted this to mean impending doom for the Tejas project, a top official dismissed it by clarifying the government was "just keeping all options open" to make "numbers" with IAF down to just 34 fighter squadrons when 44 are needed. "There could be scope for a single-engine fighter, which would be much cheaper than Rafale, somewhere between the capabilities of Rafale and Tejas," he said.

Incidentally, the original plan was that six squadrons each of MMRCA and Tejas would replace the existing 10 Mig-21 and four MiG-27 squadrons. Parrikar, on his part, said, "In the next four to five years, we can add about six LCA squadrons if we push HAL, which I am doing."

DRDO-HAL will certainly need to be pushed on the Tejas project since it's critical for self-reliance in defence production. The first Tejas was handed over to IAF on January 17 but it was in "initial operational configuration", which signifies its airworthy but not combat-ready. The pilot training and maintenance manuals are also still not ready, delaying its actual induction into IAF.

The fighter's final operational clearance (FOC), with integration of all weapons like guns, laser-guided bombs and BVR (beyond visual range) missiles as well mid-air refuelling capability, is likely to be delayed beyond the re-revised deadline of December 2015.

The Tejas Mark-II version which the IAF actually wants — with more powerful engines, airframe changes, weight and drag reduction — will begin to come in only by 2021 or so. So, Parrikar will need to do a lot of pushing if he wants swifter deliveries of the multi-role fighters.

Defence News - Can add 6 LCA Tejas squadrons in 4-5 years - Parrikar
 
. . . .
1_img116415123454.jpg


NEW DELHI: India's defence R&D establishment will have to fire on all cylinders to fast-track the meandering Tejas light combat aircraft, which is still not fully operational or combat ready, if it does not want the Narendra Modi government to critically re-examine the entire project.

The Tejas project, in fact, may even get some competition in the light-weight fighter category. Defence minister Manohar Parrikar said "some other single-engine, lighter fighter" other than the home-grown Tejas could also be considered for a "Make in India" project to replace the obsolete MiG-21s.

Restricting the acquisition of expensive twin-engine French Rafale fighters to just 36 for now, instead of the original plan for 126 MMRCA (medium multi-role combat aircraft), Parrikar stressed he was trying to plug operational gaps in airpower by improving serviceability of "heavy-weight" Sukhoi-30MKIs as well as "pushing" the DRDO-HAL combine to deliver Tejas faster.

"Don't compare Rafale, a top-end fighter, to MiG-21s, which we will phase out in about six to 10 years. The replacement for MiG-21s will be Tejas or some other single-engine, lighter aircraft. Tejas ki maar bhi kaafi hai (Tejas packs a punch) and it's much better than a MiG-21, but has certain limitations," said Parrikar.

Though some interpreted this to mean impending doom for the Tejas project, a top official dismissed it by clarifying the government was "just keeping all options open" to make "numbers" with IAF down to just 34 fighter squadrons when 44 are needed. "There could be scope for a single-engine fighter, which would be much cheaper than Rafale, somewhere between the capabilities of Rafale and Tejas," he said.

Incidentally, the original plan was that six squadrons each of MMRCA and Tejas would replace the existing 10 Mig-21 and four MiG-27 squadrons. Parrikar, on his part, said, "In the next four to five years, we can add about six LCA squadrons if we push HAL, which I am doing."

DRDO-HAL will certainly need to be pushed on the Tejas project since it's critical for self-reliance in defence production. The first Tejas was handed over to IAF on January 17 but it was in "initial operational configuration", which signifies its airworthy but not combat-ready. The pilot training and maintenance manuals are also still not ready, delaying its actual induction into IAF.

The fighter's final operational clearance (FOC), with integration of all weapons like guns, laser-guided bombs and BVR (beyond visual range) missiles as well mid-air refuelling capability, is likely to be delayed beyond the re-revised deadline of December 2015.

The Tejas Mark-II version which the IAF actually wants — with more powerful engines, airframe changes, weight and drag reduction — will begin to come in only by 2021 or so. So, Parrikar will need to do a lot of pushing if he wants swifter deliveries of the multi-role fighters.

Defence News - Can add 6 LCA Tejas squadrons in 4-5 years - Parrikar

Sure you can. Honbl. RM, try not shoot from your hip. Ramping up the production rate in order to equip 6 squadrons in 4-5 years is not doable. Unless of course the last 2 years of this (4-5) year time frame will see HAL building nearly 30 fighters per fiscal. Best of luck with that, unless you are willing to commit resources which will rival the sort sunk in by real aerospace giants in a clinch this will not be possible. At best we will see maybe 3 squadrons by the year 2020.
 
.
iaf cant trust on hal

HAL is currently building a beast called Su 30 MKI in its hangers. Entire south asian nations can only dream to built such modern aircraft including Pakistan.


Even PAF dnt like home made fighter as much as they love second hand decade old F16

Sure you can. Honbl. RM, try not shoot from your hip. Ramping up the production rate in order to equip 6 squadrons in 4-5 years is not doable. Unless of course the last 2 years of this (4-5) year time frame will see HAL building nearly 30 fighters per fiscal. Best of luck with that, unless you are willing to commit resources which will rival the sort sunk in by real aerospace giants in a clinch this will not be possible. At best we will see maybe 3 squadrons by the year 2020.

Well even if they push for 3 squadrons till 2020 that this will be major achievement.
 
.
HAL is currently building a beast called Su 30 MKI in its hangers. Entire south asian nations can only dream to built such modern aircraft including Pakistan.


Even PAF dnt like home made fighter as much as they love second hand decade old F16



Well even if they push for 3 squadrons till 2020 that this will be major achievement.

just assembled it
don't make fool others
 
. . .
We are building 10 times more parts of MKI then you can even imagine to built for your indigenous JF17 aka FC1 :lol:
And thats a fact.

Your country cant even imagine to built engine, radar, airframe but HAL building it for MKIs.
don't lie
we are not comparing HAL with pac

we are building ucav
we are also making radars
1st check
we are making trainer aircrafts
 
.
don't lie
we are not comparing HAL with pac

we are building ucav
we are also making radars
1st check
we are making trainer aircrafts

Under license and ToT ... Building Chinese equipment doesn't make you better.

Trainer, AC, UCAV .... Which one you develop in your own country ??
 
.
Under license and ToT ... Building Chinese equipment doesn't make you better.

Trainer, AC, UCAV .... Which one you develop in your own country ??
for better understanding google it

2nd

importing weapons also doesn't make u super power
 
.
They should really upgrade their output to 20-22 Tejas per year, or even more. That will facilitate in retiring the aging birds early.
 
. .
We are building 10 times more parts of MKI then you can even imagine to built for your indigenous JF17 aka FC1 :lol:
And thats a fact.

Your country cant even imagine to built engine, radar, airframe but HAL building it for MKIs.

He has a point. We didnt develop from scratch. We just assemble it and does not require much assisstance.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom