What's new

Camouflage of indigenousness for nuclear weapons & myth of Indian space programmes.

. .
How else would you explain that the country which unabashedly calls the assembly of imported parts as their indigenous plane (reference to Tejas) is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?
Even the overall design of Tejas plane has actually been plagiarized from that of Dassault Rafale plane.
 
.
Yet another chinese style echo chamber, a guy posts and the same guy with different id replies. It is like speaking to one self and we all know about who speak to themselves! :lol:
 
.
Oh boy! Someone really hates India!
Basically guy is saying India never did mars mission and America faked moon landing. :crazy:

Troll thread. Waste of your time and my time . :close_tema:
@WebMaster check this guy ip.. looks like false flagger.. @waz
Even if they did. What difference does it make now? When India is able to send commercial satellites into space much cheaper.
Yet another chinese style echo chamber, a guy posts and the same guy with different id replies. It is like speaking to one self and we all know about who speak to themselves! :lol:
I have lived for long in India. I met many people. Never once have I seen an Indian of the caliber of scientist.
 
.
Why do people even bother to reply to such delusional and blatant troll thread/deluded minds at work....is beyond me
 
. . .
@The Eagle I have seen you close thread because u claimed it was created to attract trolls(https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/excerpts-from-the-us-diplomatic-cables-burst-pakistani-myth.485623/). Are you seriously approving this thread. It provides no evidence what so ever.Are you finding this productive? The op is a false flagger and everyone knows that clearly. as long as it's against India they are immune to PDF rule? Wow the moderators are cool as long as it defended a specific countries interests and shows the other as evil?
 
. .
So what OP wanted to convey is that India is just advertising it's self as developers and under the core India is even not able to produce a simple technology like a jet fighter. I have a question if Indian space program was good and India was able to land a rover on mars how come India was not able to make it's own cruise missile this all is very strange OP has a proven point India lack in some core regions and thrives in other that only justifies OP's point. Very well assessed article in some area thou India can never threaten any of it's enemies in any way India is way far behind Pakistan China in military achievements and stuff.
 
.
regarding the indian space program i can say that they are very successful and are better than us yes it space program is one of the best in the world but he has also valid points that why can`t the same country produce cruise missile and jet. i have even read some where that the Indians produce their own circuit board and transistors from scratch for their space programs.
 
.
So what OP wanted to convey is that India is just advertising it's self as developers and under the core India is even not able to produce a simple technology like a jet fighter. I have a question if Indian space program was good and India was able to land a rover on mars how come India was not able to make it's own cruise missile this all is very strange OP has a proven point India lack in some core regions and thrives in other that only justifies OP's point. Very well assessed article in some area thou India can never threaten any of it's enemies in any way India is way far behind Pakistan China in military achievements and stuff.

I fell out of my chair laughing.

Hence they came up with copied or reverse engineered models of rockets to launch their civilian space missions. Using this copied or reverse engineered rocket technology and perhaps even covertly hiring Russian scientists, they launched their Mars mission and Lunar mission. They also use this plagiarized technology to launch commercial satellites for Western countries and charge handsome fees for their services.

rofl_example_image.png


Like Indian never took Canadian reactor

Both are mutually exclusive. The 'reactor' in the question has nothing to do with the nuclear weapons
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom