RescueRanger
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 16,370
- Reaction score
- 244
- Country
- Location
I know I should not interrupt but....I seriously got amused by your burning....lol
^
This is the quality of the senior members.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know I should not interrupt but....I seriously got amused by your burning....lol
I know I should not interrupt but....I seriously got amused by your burning....lol
BANGALORE (Dow Jones)--U.K.'s BAE Systems PLC (BA.LN) has signed a deal worth more than GBP500 million to sell an additional 57 Hawk trainer jets to India for its air force and navy, said the head of its local unit Wednesday.
"We have given a permanent license to HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.) to build the Hawk," Andrew Gallagher, managing director and chief executive of BAE Systems in India told reporters.
India's Hindustan Aeronautics is a state-run company.
India ordered 66 Hawk advanced jet trainers in 2004 for $1.45 billion for its air force.
The country wants to buy more Hawk trainers to better train its pilots for flying supersonic combat jets such as the Sukhoi-30MKI and Jaguar.
The Hawk, which can also be used as a combat aircraft, can fly at a maximum speed of 1.2 times the speed of sound.
More than 900 Hawk jets are currently in operation or have been ordered by 18 customers worldwide, according to BAE.
Benny you must be a desperate dirty piece of **** to pull some bad comments.You think Pakistanis give a **** what average briton or American thinks?These are the same people who think Indians stink and smell but you'd love to act like a whore- don't you.It's funny that Indians somehow feel that Britons think much better of you.You see Indians are the same piece of **** who when sikhs are mistakenly attacked for terrorists say they're not Muslims instead of saying terrorists have no religion.I can pull far dirtier comments about Indians by Americans/Europeons right now but that would probably get be banned.
Seems like someone in the U.S. thinks it important enough to actually bother sharing it with "Pakistanis"
Please post the relevant report from wikileaks so that the language and allegations can be looked at, because the first point to make is that there should be some reason for this report to be considered more reliable than the one about Osama flying off to NK to shop for weapons.Not interested! That's your problem. Was only interested in a specific incident. This:
It is being brought up with Pakistan because Headley's associates are alleged to be in Pakistan - just because the information is being shared with Pakistan does not in anyway illustrate institutional support from Pakistan.Only? Hardly! Let me offer a conjecture of my own; the U.S. as said by the Secretary of state is dealing with this issue. What other reason could there be to bring it up with the Pakistanis?
Each one of them could repeat the same mantra as DC, but it still won't change the nature of the G2G relationships. Sorry, but so long as NATO is in Afghanistan and the facts on the ground not reflective of the public bluster we see, G2G relationships will change little.Btw, we just heard from the PM of the U.K., it may not be a complete coincidence that he said what he said a week after meeting with the Americans. Obama is coming in a few weeks as are Sarkozy & Medvedev. Probably to tell us how dismissive they are of our concerns. Interesting times we live in.
(PR victories turning sour? I'll be sure to remind you of what you said about it at an appropriate time.)
Don't get your panties in a bunch, could have referring to 'payback' in the political sense. You should at least have him clarify.Another point. This sounds very much like a threat.
I'm sure that statement would endear Pakistanis like this gentleman to the whole wider world.
sorry for the late reply, but my culture and the environment i lived doesn't permit to go on personal against you.
Hope you debate in a civilised way taking criticisms from all angles and that is what forums are for.
You are too senior to get banned for comments like this but it is the reality we have in here.
Anyway i am just ignoring your comments here as there is nothing else for you to contribute on this.
Note: the think tank and my dear friend who has thanked a personal dirt throwing has thoroughly dissapointed me. Hope they show respect to what an international forum is and do it in a civilised way without getting too much personal like in this case of this member who is flamming.
Note: the think tank and my dear friend who has thanked a personal dirt throwing has thoroughly dissapointed me. Hope they show respect to what an international forum is and do it in a civilised way without getting too much personal like in this case of this member who is flamming.
Here is reason why Cameron talking anti Pakistan..
Money talks
Well Benny talk is cheap, where i do agree to the point that perhaps Patriot should have not gotten so personal. But then again you didnt leave any stone unturned to post comments of people tossing dirt at Pakistan. So why scream in pain when you are burning your self by playing with fire.
Please learn to recognise when you have caused offence, and secondly i have a name, learn to use it when you are referring to me. Btw we are far more lenient and respectful as compared to what you posted in your recent post.
Remember this is PDF. Don't like it, too bad!
Yes Rescue Ranger, tell me the post which has offended you.
The leniency of your posts are a debateful one and i am no here to judge you on that.
This is like a learning debating platform for me. Its just that i am a little dissapointed about the quality of posts/thoughts of some.
Posts Number 299 and Number 300, absolutely no need for them.
Would you care to quote any one of my posts where i have rediculed india or belittled its citizens or mocked her status or flamed indian members?
As am i.
I have clearly stated that the comments are from NYT.
and post number 299 talks about cameron acting as a puppet of Obama and the second part talks about taxing and income.
Its not that offensive when you consider posts with much stronger opinions in posts even from much senior members.
Post number 300 talks about mujahideen story which has been discussed and acknowledged a number of times here and the saudi factor even the members have agreed and discussed upon much earlier calling it petro money and what not.
So these are the posts which are aggressive and the not the one which went personal . Is it right Rescue ranger????