Their police and agencies are quite professional and the confidentiality of investigation is taught and practiced by all the professional agencies despite the pressure. I am still not implying that it was French govt involved despite their pretty anti-islamic legislations of targeting headscarf etc. But there is something fishy and there is a pattern. If you refer to my original post, my take is the pattern.
Human beings are not robots - you can't expect one hundred percent compliance/perfection, especially when extreme emotions and stress are in play. With respect to Western controls over government individuals - we've had wikileaks and the Snowden disclosures after all, so there are plenty of examples of much higher profile and sensitive leaks in the West before this 'Syrian Passport'. Any individual out of the many who were likely aware of the recovery of the passport could have leaked the information. In the scheme of things, the leak of news related to the 'Syrian Passport' is inconsequential, given that ISIS and their various mouthpieces were jumping for joy over the attacks and accepted responsibility.
A terrorist acts happens.......they get killed....passports are found.....investigation and reports are not made public and if made public, none is allowed to argue or question......action takes place against Muslims
Here's another narrative - A terrorist attack happens (in Iraq, almost 2 years ago). An extremist terrorist group calling itself the Islamic State massacres innocent Shia and Yazidi men, women and children as it rolls through villages and towns driving out a politicized and corrupt Iraqi Army (thank you Al Maliki and cohorts).
The terrorist group perpetrates barbarity after barbarity - men, women and children lined up and massacred in cold blood. Women (little girls even) enslaved, raped and sold off or passed around like possessions. Foreign journalists and aid workers kidnapped and massacred. Captured fighters tortured and burned alive.
A terrorist attack happens, and happens again, and again, and again - tens of thousands are massacred by this group and images of the bearded neanderthals populating its ranks are plastered over social media rejoicing in their atrocities.
The terrorist group, ISIS, proudly claims all these atrocities, proudly rants and raves about carrying out terrorism in the West and in any country that opposes it
The terrorist group, ISIS, proudly claims the bombing of a Russian civilian airliner, massacring hundreds of innocents.
The terrorist group, ISIS, proudly claims a terrorist bombing in Lebanon, massacring dozens of innocents.
The terrorist group, ISIS, proudly claims the terrorist attacks in Paris, massacring over a hundred innocents.
After all this depravity and horror, what on earth makes you focus on the fact that someone in the French government leaked the discovery of a Syrian passport? Are you so consumed with a hatred of the West that you choose to ignore the unfathomable pain and suffering inflicted by ISIS upon Muslims and non-Muslims alike, and choose to cry and play victim over a 'passport leak'?
It's not the passport leak that creates hurdles for, and negative sentiment against, Muslims abroad - it's attitudes such as yours, that create conspiracy theories out of insignificant and trivial details, to somehow pretend that the Muslim world does not have a problem with intolerance and hatemongering and to somehow pretend that the monsters raping, pillaging and massacring tens of thousands under the banner of the Islamic State are not Muslims who used to be just like us, from among us.
Muslims have a problem - ISIS and extremist ideologies like it are attracting young, educated and otherwise 'rational' Muslims who would have had bright futures in front of them had they stuck to their education and careers. Part of the problem is this attitude on display right here - no, you're not explicitly endorsing ISIS, but by latching onto trivial issues and inflating them into these conspiracy theories you are playing a part in deflecting attention from the atrocities of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Lashkar-E-Jhangvi, TTP etc, and you're playing a part in dehumanizing the West, trying to argue that even their tragedies and losses are some kind of evil conspiracy or plot hatched against Muslims.
The first step is to go back to the basics of Islam and remember what it teaches Muslims about respecting non-Muslims, respecting those from other sects such as the Shia, Barelvis etc - respect their beliefs, understand and share their grief and pain over the losses they have suffered in countless terrorist attacks. Stop deflecting and hiding from the painful and ugly truth.
If Muslims can't bring themselves to end the dehumanization of the West and other Islamic sects through these poisonous and absurd conspiracy theories and attitudes, then the answer to my earlier question, about why young, educated and well off Muslims are joining a murderous cause, is pretty self-evident.
I have a few questions regarding the Paris attacks and I would like you to answer them.
1- What did the directors of the CIA and French intelligence discuss at their meeting a few days prior to the Paris attacks?
Sorry, I was really busy and couldn't talk to them when they called. What on earth does it matter what they discussed? Was this the only meeting between the CIA and French intelligence in the last 5 years or something? I had a really painful bowel movement the day before the Paris attacks - was there some conspiracy involved in that too?
2- Why has there been no media investigation of the report that French police were blinded by a sophisticated cyber attack on their mobile data tracking system? Does anyone really believe that ISIL has such capability?
I'm not aware of the attack - are there any credible reports (as in not sourced to conspiracy theory sites) that reference this attack?
On this subject though, what exactly would 'mobile data tracking system' have allowed the French to do? Twin bombings went off at the Stadium. AK-47's were fired in cafe's and then the attackers went into a concert hall and massacred innocents in cold blood. Everyone knew where they were - you don't need a 'sophisticated mobile data tracking system' for this.
And just so it's out there, if the French had tracked the terrorists using cell communication, you'd be coming up with another conspiracy theory of, ' no terrorist in his right mind would be using his cell phone to chat, surf the web or post messages on facebook while carrying out a terrorist attack, just so the French could track him'.
Once these depraved individuals had initiated their plan, there was very little chance of stopping it. In fact, France is lucky that the bombings at the stadium did not kill many more than they did.
3- Why did and what was the probability of the attacks occurring on the same day as an emergency scenario/simulation of a multi-site terrorist attack is conducted, involving first responders, medical personnel, police and firemen?
When did this occur, what's the relevance? Credible sources please.
I would also like to use this moment as an opportunity to ask you some questions regarding the terror attacks of 9/11, after all those attacks are what started it all.
I would like to use this moment to respectfully decline. The two events are not related. They were perpetrated by 2 entirely different groups - albeit driven by the same ideology of hate.
But among all people want to believe it belongs to a person whose blood splatters left and right and not a page got torn! MAN they should make fire fighters and army uniform from that material!
