Build a Temple or a Gurudwara in place of Akbarabadi mosque:Hindu Mahasabha

[Anish1]

So why you don't destroy taj mahal and build that spell-binding Hindu architectures again

Taj Mahal was a hindu temple until muslim invaders came and spread islam.
Taj Mahal - A Hindu Temple-Palace

 

[sangsharma]

The reign of Aurangzeb was particularly brutal. No aspect of Aurangzeb's reign is more cited - or more controversial - than the numerous desecrations and even the destruction of Hindu temples. Aurangzeb banned Diwali, placed a jizya (tax) on non-Muslims and martyred the ninth Sikh guru Tegh Bahadur.
During his reign, tens of thousands of temples were desecrated: their facades and interiors were defaced and their murtis (divine images) looted. In many cases, temples were destroyed entirely; in numerous instances mosques were built on their foundations, sometimes using the same stones. Among the temples Aurangzeb destroyed were two that are most sacred to Hindus, in Varanasi and Mathura. In both cases, he had large mosques built on the sites.The Kesava Deo temple in Mathura, marked the place that Hindus believe was the birth place of Shri Krishna. In 1661 Aurangzeb ordered the demolition of the temple, and constructed the Katra Masjid mosque. Traces of the ancient Hindu temple can be seen from the back of the mosque. Aurangzeb also destroyed what was the most famous temple in Varanasi- the Vishwanath Temple. The temple had changed its location over the years, but in 1585 Akbar had authorized its location at Gyan Vapi. Aurangzeb ordered its demolition in 1669 and constructed a mosque on the site, whose minarets stand 71 metres above the Ganges. Traces of the old temple can be seen behind the mosque. Centuries later, emotional debate about these wanton acts of cultural desecration continues. Aurangzeb also destroyed the Somnath temple in 1706.
Hindu nationalists claim that Mughals destroyed the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, located at the birthplace of Rama, and built the Babri Masjid on the holy site, which has since been a source of tension between the Hindu and Muslim communities.
Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilizations , Islamic rule in India as a "colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalement, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves."

And if anyone still dare to say that Muslims were persecuted,let them see this. We will see what they have to say after reading this. And our Muslim elders say this was the Ganga Jamuni tajeeb in Varanasi. They only destroyed our top two religious temple & other numerous temple. Still we didn't touch their religious site. Babri Mosque was built upon some type of structure. Muslim in India claim it was plain land. While 1(Muslim) of the 3 judges in high court said there was indeed a structure which was destroyed but he didn't name it. If you people still want to rant,keep it going,nothing changes. That was the only time when Hindus attacked a mosque for religious region if I am not wrong.

Those invaders or kings whatever we call them, mostly had a tendency to demolish temples. I wonder what our neighbours think about this (I am sure they will try to defend themselves by citing the single example of Babri Masjid, in reply to scores of temples destroyed by invaders).

 

[Raja.Pakistani]

Are not we getting more replies from followers of hindu talib bal thakrey now same approach as those of talibaan

Taj mahal is not mosque and its stupid people comparing it with tempels. Dont you guys care about sensibilities of fellow indian muslim when you talk about destruction of mosques and which mosque in india created terrorists..shame on your mentality

 

[saiyan0321]

Are not we getting more replies from followers of hindu talib bal thakrey now same approach as those of talibaan

Taj mahal is not mosque and its stupid people comparing it with tempels. Dont you guys care about sensibilities of fellow indian muslim when you talk about destruction of mosques and which mosque in india created terrorists..shame on your mentality

raja sahab when you argue against internet hindus you will see that they can goo too soo many low lengths just to undermine muslims. what i dont understand is india has soo much injustice in his country soo many cases still not finished concentrating on this would be extremely unfair to those guys who are suffering due to late justice and stuff now many internet hindus will say they are happy to suffer or should suffer to protect hindu indentity in india but i think a secular country would consider that wrong.....

india is a secular country and many are proud of it they are happy that their country is oo colorful with many religions in it the sign of mosque,s churches gurdwara,s temples show that different religions can coexist in a same place and apparently men of bal thackery on the net want to destroy it to satisfy their own hunger well i say go ahead break taj mahal too and show that there is no difference between the taliban and indians.....

when the taliban stook over swat they destroyed soo many ancient buddhist artifacts they acted like wild extremist animals and same in afghanistan so do that and show that you are hindu talibans

 

[Anish1]

Are not we getting more replies from followers of hindu talib bal thakrey now same approach as those of talibaan

Taj mahal is not mosque and its stupid people comparing it with tempels. Dont you guys care about sensibilities of fellow indian muslim when you talk about destruction of mosques and which mosque in india created terrorists..shame on your mentality

Get your facts straight and see my earlier post.
Taj Mahal was a Shiv Mandir in Agra called Tejo Mahalaya.

raja sahab when you argue against internet hindus you will see that they can goo too soo many low lengths just to undermine muslims. what i dont understand is india has soo much injustice in his country soo many cases still not finished concentrating on this would be extremely unfair to those guys who are suffering due to late justice and stuff now many internet hindus will say they are happy to suffer or should suffer to protect hindu indentity in india but i think a secular country would consider that wrong.....

india is a secular country and many are proud of it they are happy that their country is oo colorful with many religions in it the sign of mosque,s churches gurdwara,s temples show that different religions can coexist in a same place and apparently men of bal thackery on the net want to destroy it to satisfy their own hunger well i say go ahead break taj mahal too and show that there is no difference between the taliban and indians.....

when the taliban stook over swat they destroyed soo many ancient buddhist artifacts they acted like wild extremist animals and same in afghanistan so do that and show that you are hindu talibans

the only taliban here is Matia Mahal MLA Shoaib Malik who went and tried making a mosque over a former Pandav era temple.

 

[RISING SUN]

Are not we getting more replies from followers of hindu talib bal thakrey now same approach as those of talibaan

Taj mahal is not mosque and its stupid people comparing it with tempels. Dont you guys care about sensibilities of fellow indian muslim when you talk about destruction of mosques and which mosque in india created terrorists..shame on your mentality

1st- If you see freedom of expression as Taliban,that must be the reason why Pakistan is in tight grip of terrorism.

2nd- Nobody is saying let destroy mosque. It's heinous job to even think about it. But history doesn't stops us to tell the truth which Muslim rulers exerted upon us,Hindus & other homogenous humans. Come out of your day dreaming. Nobody is going to destroy a Mosque in India. Babari case was sheer ignorance of Hindu & Muslim extremists. I will vote for BJP but that doesn't force me to accept their wrong doings. Congress is much more communal than BJP. So get your facts clear. Over & out.

 

[AnkurPandey]

-- Please stop this thread now. No need to discuss these things here. We have Supreme court to decide these things and it will take actions accordingly --

 

[Bhairava]

^^ What does your signature mean ?

 

[AnkurPandey]

^^ What does your signature mean ?

Did you asked mine ? This means my body ... my soul ... every single bit of my body is Hindu. This is my introduction.

 

[sab]

Get your facts straight and see my earlier post.
Taj Mahal was a Shiv Mandir in Agra called Tejo Mahalaya.



the only taliban here is Matia Mahal MLA Shoaib Malik who went and tried making a mosque over a former Pandav era temple.

Tejo Mahalaya....you also jump after reading (or just hearing of it) books by P N OAK (joke is better).

Go...read his book and if you something called brain you will understand how stupid logic he has given.....BTW Oak is the same person who claimed Christianiti came from Krishna Niti; Vatican from Sanskrit Vatika.....Kabba, Westminister abbey were Hindu temples......and so on...
He never was a historian just fanboys like you make him one...

 

[Raja.Pakistani]

Those invaders or kings whatever we call them, mostly had a tendency to demolish temples. I wonder what our neighbours think about this (I am sure they will try to defend themselves by citing the single example of Babri Masjid, in reply to scores of temples destroyed by invaders).

What we think about something happened century ago is irrelevant now. Again there is also no use of you to cry over split milk.

If what you said is true then why you(your ancestors) did not stop them or fight with them when they were destroying temple or were building mosques/mahal or when they were taking over all your precious jewels? Blame yourself if you were coward or weak to not defend your temple or jewels from invaders or you wish to take the revenge of those invaders from fellows Indian Muslims..

Whether there were temples in place of Taj mahal or babri mosque is history but taj mahal is present. Better live in present instead of past or another option(as said before) is to wipe out these taj mahal and everything Mughuls, persians and English built in india and try to rebuild again what was there before invaders ..choice is your but stop making fun of yourself by creating such stupid posts

 

[yyetttt]

LOL@ Taj Mahal Hindu...

 

[Anish1]

What we think about something happened century ago is irrelevant now. Again there is also no use of you to cry over split milk.

If what you said is true then why you(your ancestors) did not stop them or fight with them when they were destroying temple or were building mosques/mahal or when they were taking over all your precious jewels? Blame yourself if you were coward or weak to not defend your temple or jewels from invaders or you wish to take the revenge of those invaders from fellows Indian Muslims..

Whether there were temples in place of Taj mahal or babri mosque is history but taj mahal is present. Better live in present instead of past or another option(as said before) is to wipe out these taj mahal and everything Mughuls, persians and English built in india and try to rebuild again what was there before invaders ..choice is your but stop making fun of yourself by creating such stupid posts

In the past we were outnumbered but now we will hit back and hit back hard

Tejo Mahalaya....you also jump after reading (or just hearing of it) books by P N OAK (joke is better).

Go...read his book and if you something called brain you will understand how stupid logic he has given.....BTW Oak is the same person who claimed Christianiti came from Krishna Niti; Vatican from Sanskrit Vatika.....Kabba, Westminister abbey were Hindu temples......and so on...
He never was a historian just fanboys like you make him one...

Go read the link i posted until then STFU

 

[Nair saab]

Don’t worry. It’s all in the name of religion

The recent construction of an illegal mosque in Delhi is symptomatic of the crass politics of minorityism played by the Congress which is desperate to win Muslim votes.



The nonchalance with which the MLA of Delhi’s Matia Mahal constituency, Mr Shoaib Iqbal, went about raising a mosque at Subhash Park on the pretext that that was the exact spot where an ancient mosque existed is both shocking and not-so-shocking at the same time.

The incident is shocking because the construction of the mosque on land that belonged to North Delhi Municipality and had been leased to Delhi Metro, went on for days but the administration did nothing. It was only after the other locals objected did the Delhi Government intervene and finally a court order was issued to halt the construction. However, by then a massive wall for the proposed mosque had already been built.

On the other hand, the incident is not so shocking because this is what is to be expected from our Government under Congress rule. The entire system bends backwards to please one community to the exclusion of all others in what is drummed up as secularism in India. And hence, some clerics of the community ask the Government to prevent author Salman Rushdie from visiting India, and the Government works to keep him out. Similarly, Muslim leaders in Hyderabad manhandle another famous author Tasleema Nasreen for her writings and the Government gets her to leave the country as well but does not punish the perpetrators.

Worse still, in Muslim majority Jammu & Kashmir, residents of the State have been thrown out lock, stock and barrel because they are Hindus. But the Congress-led Union Government that is supposed to protect the basic rights of every citizen does not even talk about this exodus. On the other hand, the 2002 violence in Gujarat remains a talking point for the Centre even when its alleged victims want to get on with their lives and forget the past.

In Kerala, where the Muslim League is a partner of the Congress-led United Front State Government, the former gets to appoint five Ministers as against its quota of four and then goes about communalising the State’s education system much to the collective shock of the other communities. This forced the two major Hindu communities in Kerala, the Nairs and the Ezhavas, to come together and oppose such appeasement politics. Even the Christian party, Kerala Congress, is disturbed .

The Congress in its eagerness to monopolise the Muslim vote-bank has gone all out not just by bending backwards but also genuflect before that community. Consequently, communalism now threatens to divide this country.

The Prime Minister has said on record that minorities (read Muslims) will be given first priority on development funds. His colleague had sought to institute a Muslim-only-quota within the OBC quota but could not implement it due to the intervention of the Supreme Court.

Across the country, Islamic religious schools or madrasas are being given the same status as regular schools affiliated to accredited secondary education boards. As a result, certificates issued by madrasas will now have the same value as that of accredited schools even though the former are usually not registered and do not teach secular subjects.

To make matters worse, the Congress is now proposing a separate Muslim banking system where there will be no interest rates. If this proposal is implemented, soon enough India will have two economies in one country. One economy where interest rates will be determined by a central bank and all activities will be governed by the RBI’s laws and regulation, and a second economy over which the Government will have no control.

Already, there are two sets of rules as far as family laws are concerned. For instance, while polygamy is considered criminal for the rest of the country, it is legal for Muslims. Similarly, with respect to family planning, Muslim couples are allowed multiple children while non-Muslims are penalised for having more than two.

Thus, the Congress is pushing the country towards a duality. A dual state that allows a Hindu minority community in one part of the country, to be thrown out on the one hand, while encouraging the pampering of Muslim minorities; a State wherein a majority of children will learn English, some regional languages, modern science and humanities while a minority of children will learn Arabic and some Islamic religious texts.

Self-styled secularists in the Congress seem to be unconcerned if this division leads to political consequences. Even the carrying out of a death sentence handed down to the terrorist who attacked Parliament has been stopped keeping in mind ‘communal considerations’.

This very cleft-foot attitude of some political parties is encouraging the separatist forces as well. In Tamil Nadu, the ‘Tamil Eelam’ demand has raised its ugly head once again. Yet, the hanging of Rajiv Gandhi’s killers is being resisted on grounds of regionalism. The DMK supremo may have been prevented from going overboard with his ‘Tamil Eelam’ demand when he sought to inaugurate a conference of Tamil separatists, but it was only at the last minute.

In West Bengal, the Trinamool Congress regime has thrown all caution to the wind in promoting Muslim irredentism by giving pensions to Muslim clerics, according official status to madrasas etc. In Uttar Pradesh, the country’s largest State, the party in power is totally subservient to the Muslim orthodoxy that wants no change in family laws applicable to their community only. Other pseudo-secular parties are only making the situation worse by competing among themselves to placate such communal irredentism.

What one recently witnessed at Subhash Park in Delhi was inevitable in such a circumstance, where one community is encouraged to believe that it can get away with separatist demands to demarcate themselves away from the majority of the country’s culture, ethos and even the economy.

Otherwise Mr Iqbal would not have dared to begin an illegal construction on Government land and then get his men to turn it into a prayer ground while the authorities shut their eyes to his flagrant violation of the law of the land. This is the second such incident in the nation’s capital after the Jangpura land grab and mosque construction case.

There is more than symbolism in this: It is now clear that the communal challenge to the country’s authority has reached the national capital itself.


Don

 

[notsuperstitious]

What we think about something happened century ago is irrelevant now. Again there is also no use of you to cry over split milk.

You are a typical run of the mill hypocrite, the so called Akbarabadi mosque was also destroyed centuries ago and they only make this claim now when the govt is making metro station there.

But then you even deny Hindu temples were destroyed when muslims rulers in their official court documents wrote about this religious act of theirs in glowing words. You are too typically in denial and your comments on Indian matters only splash your hatred.