Buddhism and Ashoka responsible for India's decline and hardships

[Manas]

or you should say that Mongol has Chinese DNA as for Indian you guys got invaded by Persans, Arab, Greek and Britsh, most of "white" Indian DNA are from these people, only the darky one are the naitve Indian...you should be proud of yourself....LMAO taking about DNA.

Chinese Chirkut ( google the meaning of Chirkut ! )

All those ppl you say invaded India , you know they first conquered the part of india what called pakistan now . So please don't insult your Pakistani friends in this rash manner .

BTW , DNA of most Indians are well settled some 40,000 years ago , well before any invader or even Aryan migrants appeared in the scene .

http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090922/full/news.2009.935.html

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

After the Kalinga war , Ashok adopted Buddhist life and renounced violence and stopped any further war or expansion of Maurayan empire .

What ever the truth , Buddhist principle of non violence did curb expansion tendencies especially among Buddhist rulers and also general populous had huge change in life style .

Even after conversion to Bhuddism in India, we had good success against Invaders: Sycthicians, Huns, Hephthalites and Arabs.

Its only after fragmentation of large empires in North and South did India becomes vulnerable to Ghanzavids and Ghurids.

You have been lying the same lie too many times trying to defame me and instigate a bad feeling between Pakistanis and Chinese. I will explain it again here, and if you continue to spread the same lie about me, I will report you for "lying with an evil intention". The issue has been resolved half a year ago. Just don't understand why you have to keep resorting to lies.

The particular term you are referring to, if even considered as a "slur", was meant for Indian. There is NO any "slur" in China for people of Pakistan. Every Chinese member here can verify my statement here. If you want and if PDF allows, I can tell you the the history of the term, and you decide if it is racial slur.

@Chinese-Dragon

You yourself know, what you have written is utter lies.

The very fact you do not even dare to use that particular term anymore vindicates my statements

A Chinese Govt educational video itself shows the usage of the racial slur against Pakistanis:

Besides why would anyone be gullible enough to ask pdf Chinese on racial slurs, considering they went to great lengths to justify usage of racial slur against Vietnamese members

***** Australia Rejects Joint Patrol with US Navy in South China Sea *****


Feel free justify your racism here, but do not expect everyone to keep quiet about it

@Joe Shearer

There was nothing to expand, why would Mauryas expand to worst agrarian terrains, no wealth was there.

There never was any advantage for India invasions, given India had large agrarian terrains, also precious stones and metals found here.

However expansion into invader territories would ensure long-term protection against invasions.

The first invasion we faced from central Asians was in somewhere around 40 BC by Sythicians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Scythians#Gandhara_and_Punjab

Had we gone on the offensive against them rather merely defending ourselves, we would have ensured subsequent invasions from Centrals Asians such as : Huns, Hepthalites, Ghaznavids, Ghurids, Delhi Sultanate, Mughals. would have ceased.

These long list of invasions continued for 1500 years.

One of majors reasons for Central Asian threat to India after Mughals was mitigated was due to Russian expansion into Central Asia.

The Russians faced threats from the East, they responded to it by expanding eastward and today they have modern Russia.

One can wait for centuries for invasions to stop or act upon it themselves.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Even after conversion to Bhuddism in India, we had good success against Invaders: Sycthicians, Huns, Hephthalites and Arabs.

Its only after fragmentation of large empires in North and South did India becomes vulnerable to Ghanzavids and Ghurids.



You yourself know, what you have written is utter lies.

The very fact you do not even dare to use that particular term anymore vindicates my statements

A Chinese Govt educational video itself shows the usage of the racial slur against Pakistanis:

Besides why would anyone be gullible enough to ask pdf Chinese on racial slurs, considering they went to great lengths to justify usage of racial slur against Vietnamese members

***** Australia Rejects Joint Patrol with US Navy in South China Sea *****


Feel free justify your racism here, but do not expect everyone to keep quiet about it

@Joe Shearer



There never was any advantage for India invasions, given India had large agrarian terrains, also precious stones and metals found here.

However expansion into invader territories would ensure long-term protection against invasions.

The first invasion we faced from central Asians was in somewhere around 40 BC by Sythicians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Scythians#Gandhara_and_Punjab

Had we gone on the offensive against them rather merely defending ourselves, we would have ensured subsequent invasions from Centrals Asians such as : Huns, Hepthalites, Ghaznavids, Ghurids, Delhi Sultanate, Mughals. would have ceased.

These long list of invasions continued for 1500 years.

One of majors reasons for Central Asian threat to India after Mughals was mitigated was due to Russian expansion into Central Asia.

The Russians faced threats from the East, they responded to it by expanding eastward and today they have modern Russia.

One can wait for centuries for invasions to stop or act upon it themselves.

I will revert on this in the evening.