What's new

Buddha Head Found amid New Excavation Efforts in Gujarat, India

I hate to break it to you, but there are still millions of Buddhists in India. Unfortunately, buddhism has become extinct in Pakistan and Afghanistan due to 1000 years of Muslim rule in those regions, which is very sad. It's a good thing Muslims only ruled parts of Northern India for less than 500 years, or else Buddhism would have met the same fate in India as it had in Pakistan and Buddhism.

th

As you can see, there are still several districts where Buddhists are the majority. How many such districts exist in Pakistan?

Accounts from the first Muslims in around the 700 AC says that the Indus was Hindu.

We know it used to be majority buddhist.
What happened?

Obviously forcibly converted to Hinduism.
 
.
Accounts from the first Muslims in around the 700 AC says that the Indus was Hindu.

We know it used to be majority buddhist.
What happened?

Obviously forcibly converted to Hinduism.
Except it was never majority Buddhist. As I explained before, when Buddhism spread throughout South Asia, it mostly got incorporated into Hinduism and the two were practiced side by side. No part of South Asia was majority Buddhist. Can you provide any evidence of that?

The idea that Hindus forcibly converted Buddhists is just a myth spread by Pakistanis so that they can claim they have no connection to Hinduism or the Ganges region.
 
.
I hate to break it to you, but there are still millions of Buddhists in India. Unfortunately, buddhism has become extinct in Pakistan and Afghanistan due to 1000 years of Muslim rule in those regions, which is very sad. It's a good thing Muslims only ruled parts of Northern India for less than 500 years, or else Buddhism would have met the same fate in India as it had in Pakistan and Buddhism.

th

As you can see, there are still several districts where Buddhists are the majority. How many such districts exist in Pakistan?


Buddhism simply got absorbed into Hinduism do to all the similarities they share. As I already explained, many South Asian Buddhists also incorporated Hindu practices as well. There was never any conflict between Hindus and Buddhists like there was between Hindus and Muslims.
Wrong map of India. India does not control Pakistani controlled Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan.

These maps of India should be banned on PDF.
 
.
Except it was never majority Buddhist. As I explained before, when Buddhism spread throughout South Asia, it mostly got incorporated into Hinduism and the two were practiced side by side. No part of South Asia was majority Buddhist. Can you provide any evidence of that?

The idea that Hindus forcibly converted Buddhists is just a myth spread by Pakistanis so that they can claim they have no connection to Hinduism or the Ganges region.
So those buddhits statues, and temples found in the Indus valley must be fake.

It must be so nice living in a fantasy land like you people do.
No need to listen to facts, just make up things and insist it's true.

FACT: Indus valley was Buddhist but by the time Muslims came, no Buddhists were to be found.

FACT: India is still majority Hindu despite 800 years of Muslim domination.

FACT: India needs more toilets.... Sorry could not help myself :angel:
 
.
The same one of Hindus where they say Muslims were forcibly converted.

80% of India is Hindu... 0.1% is still Budhists.

It's clear who was forcibly converted.
My friend this can’t be further from the truth.
Anyways, the buddha head is a cool archeological find.
Have a great day!
 
.
So those buddhits statues, and temples found in the Indus valley must be fake.

It must be so nice living in a fantasy land like you people do.
No need to listen to facts, just make up things and insist it's true.

FACT: Indus valley was Buddhist but by the time Muslims came, no Buddhists were to be found.

FACT: India is still majority Hindu despite 800 years of Muslim domination.

FACT: India needs more toilets.... Sorry could not help myself :angel:
like i said many south asian buddhists also practiced variations of hinduism. NO part of south asia except lanka and parts of nepal and ne india were majority buddhist. There have also been many hindu idols discovered in pakistan and afghanistan, so your point is invalid.

And how many buddhists are left in muslim pakistan and afghanistan? As I have shown, there are still millions of buddhists in india. Your narrative has just been destroyed.


Here is another fact: Pakistan has more poverty and rapes per capita than india.
 
. .
So those buddhits statues, and temples found in the Indus valley must be fake.

It must be so nice living in a fantasy land like you people do.
No need to listen to facts, just make up things and insist it's true.

FACT: Indus valley was Buddhist but by the time Muslims came, no Buddhists were to be found.

FACT: India is still majority Hindu despite 800 years of Muslim domination.

FACT: India needs more toilets.... Sorry could not help myself :angel:
It appears Pakistan's ancestors were Buddhists.

Read this excerpt from Wikipedia:

The Kushan empire (30–375 CE) was formed by the invading Yuezhi nomads in the 1st century BCE. It eventually encompassed much of northern India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Kushans adopted elements of the Hellenistic culture of Bactria and the Indo-Greeks.[68] During Kushan rule, Gandharan Buddhism was at the height of its influence and a significant number of Buddhist centers were built or renovated.[69] The Buddhist art of Kushan Gandhara was a synthesis of Greco-Roman, Iranian and Indian elements.[70] The Gandhāran Buddhist texts also date from this period. Written in Gāndhārī Prakrit, they are the oldest Buddhist manuscripts yet discovered (circa 1st century CE).[71] According to Richard Salomon, most of them belong to the Dharmaguptaka school.[72]


Gold coin of Kanishka I with a representation of the Buddha (c.120 AD).
Emperor Kanishka (128–151 CE) is particularly known for his support of Buddhism. During his reign, stupas and monasteries were built in the Gandhāran city of Peshawar (Skt. Purusapura), which he used as a capital.[73] Kushan royal support and the opening of trade routes allowed Gandharan Buddhism to spread along the Silk Road to Central Asia, the Tarim Basin and thus to China.[74]

Kanishka is also said to have convened a major Buddhist council for the Sarvastivada tradition, either in Gandhara or Kashmir.[75] Kanishka gathered 500 learned monks partly to compile extensive commentaries on the Abhidharma, although it is possible that some editorial work was carried out upon the existing Sarvastivada canon itself. Allegedly during the council there were altogether three hundred thousand verses and over nine million statements compiled, and it took twelve years to complete. The main fruit of this council was the compilation of the vast commentary known as the Mahā-Vibhāshā ("Great Exegesis"), an extensive compendium and reference work on a portion of the Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma.[76] Modern scholars such as Etienne Lamotte and David Snellgrove have questioned the veracity of this traditional account.[77][78]

Scholars believe that it was also around this time that a significant change was made in the language of the Sarvāstivādin canon, by converting an earlier Prakrit version into Sanskrit. Although this change was probably effected without significant loss of integrity to the canon, this event was of particular significance since Sanskrit was the sacred language of Brahmanism in India, and was also being used by other thinkers, regardless of their specific religious or philosophical allegiance, thus enabling a far wider audience to gain access to Buddhist ideas and practices.

After the fall of the Kushans, small kingdoms ruled the Gandharan region, and later the Hephthalite White Huns conquered the area (circa 440s–670). Under the Hephthalites, Gandharan Buddhism continued to thrive in cities like Balkh (Bactria), as remarked by Xuanzang who visited the region in the 7th century.[79] Xuanzang notes that there were over a hundred Buddhist monasteries in the city, including the Nava Vihara as well many stupas and monks.[80] After the end of the Hephthalite empire, Gandharan Buddhism declined in Gandhara proper (in the Peshawar basin).[81] However it continued to thrive in adjacent areas like the Swat Valley of Pakistan, Gilgit, Kashmir and in Afghanistan (in sites such as Bamiyan).[82]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Buddhism

I get annoyed when people from an international audience or people from the West constantly think we Pakistanis are converts to Islam from Hinduism.

Only the Muhajirs from India to Pakistan may have Hindus as their ancestors before converting to Islam.
 
.
It appears Pakistan's ancestors were Buddhists.

Read this excerpt from Wikipedia:

The Kushan empire (30–375 CE) was formed by the invading Yuezhi nomads in the 1st century BCE. It eventually encompassed much of northern India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Kushans adopted elements of the Hellenistic culture of Bactria and the Indo-Greeks.[68] During Kushan rule, Gandharan Buddhism was at the height of its influence and a significant number of Buddhist centers were built or renovated.[69] The Buddhist art of Kushan Gandhara was a synthesis of Greco-Roman, Iranian and Indian elements.[70] The Gandhāran Buddhist texts also date from this period. Written in Gāndhārī Prakrit, they are the oldest Buddhist manuscripts yet discovered (circa 1st century CE).[71] According to Richard Salomon, most of them belong to the Dharmaguptaka school.[72]


Gold coin of Kanishka I with a representation of the Buddha (c.120 AD).
Emperor Kanishka (128–151 CE) is particularly known for his support of Buddhism. During his reign, stupas and monasteries were built in the Gandhāran city of Peshawar (Skt. Purusapura), which he used as a capital.[73] Kushan royal support and the opening of trade routes allowed Gandharan Buddhism to spread along the Silk Road to Central Asia, the Tarim Basin and thus to China.[74]

Kanishka is also said to have convened a major Buddhist council for the Sarvastivada tradition, either in Gandhara or Kashmir.[75] Kanishka gathered 500 learned monks partly to compile extensive commentaries on the Abhidharma, although it is possible that some editorial work was carried out upon the existing Sarvastivada canon itself. Allegedly during the council there were altogether three hundred thousand verses and over nine million statements compiled, and it took twelve years to complete. The main fruit of this council was the compilation of the vast commentary known as the Mahā-Vibhāshā ("Great Exegesis"), an extensive compendium and reference work on a portion of the Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma.[76] Modern scholars such as Etienne Lamotte and David Snellgrove have questioned the veracity of this traditional account.[77][78]

Scholars believe that it was also around this time that a significant change was made in the language of the Sarvāstivādin canon, by converting an earlier Prakrit version into Sanskrit. Although this change was probably effected without significant loss of integrity to the canon, this event was of particular significance since Sanskrit was the sacred language of Brahmanism in India, and was also being used by other thinkers, regardless of their specific religious or philosophical allegiance, thus enabling a far wider audience to gain access to Buddhist ideas and practices.

After the fall of the Kushans, small kingdoms ruled the Gandharan region, and later the Hephthalite White Huns conquered the area (circa 440s–670). Under the Hephthalites, Gandharan Buddhism continued to thrive in cities like Balkh (Bactria), as remarked by Xuanzang who visited the region in the 7th century.[79] Xuanzang notes that there were over a hundred Buddhist monasteries in the city, including the Nava Vihara as well many stupas and monks.[80] After the end of the Hephthalite empire, Gandharan Buddhism declined in Gandhara proper (in the Peshawar basin).[81] However it continued to thrive in adjacent areas like the Swat Valley of Pakistan, Gilgit, Kashmir and in Afghanistan (in sites such as Bamiyan).[82]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Buddhism

I get annoyed when people from an international audience or people from the West constantly think we Pakistanis are converts to Islam from Hinduism.

Only the Muhajirs from India to Pakistan may have Hindus as their ancestors before converting to Islam.
Vasudeva, one of the greatest Kushan Emperors, converted to Hinduism. Another example of how Hinduism, Buddhism, and Greek polytheism existed side by side in the Indus valley during the Gandharan and Kushan periods, rather than buddhism dominating as claimed by some Pakistanis who want to disassociate from Hinduism.
 
.
Vasudeva, one of the greatest Kushan Emperors, converted to Hinduism. Another example of how Hinduism, Buddhism, and Greek polytheism existed side by side in the Indus valley during the Gandharan and Kushan periods, rather than buddhism dominating as claimed by some Pakistanis who want to disassociate from Hinduism.
Even if what you are saying is true...You cannot blame Pakistanis who want to dissociate from Republic of India.

We have a distinct identity.

We can be friends, but it is time to accept Pakistan as a reality.
 
.
And Muslim forced conversation in India also can't be further from the truth.

Doest stop millions of Hindus from repeating it.
Than how do you explain the fact that Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh, and Hyderabad, the only part of India ruled by Muslims for several centuries, have the most Muslims, whereas places like Tamil Nadu, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, and Nepal that were almost never ruled by Muslims barely have any Muslim populations?

Even if what you are saying is true...You cannot blame Pakistanis who want to dissociate from Republic of India.

We have a distinct identity.

We can be friends, but it is time to accept Pakistan as a reality.
Most Indians accept Pakistan's existance. I also understand they have had a separate identity from most of India throughout the region's history, and I respect that. But you cannot let present-day biases influence historical analysis. Such revisionism is the cause of many of our disputes. Pakistanis claiming that they have had nothing to do with Hinduism or present-day India are no different than Akhand Bharat revisionists who think everything from Afghanistan to Indonesia was one country.
 
.
like i said many south asian buddhists also practiced variations of hinduism. NO part of south asia except lanka and parts of nepal and ne india were majority buddhist. There have also been many hindu idols discovered in pakistan and afghanistan, so your point is invalid.

And how many buddhists are left in muslim pakistan and afghanistan? As I have shown, there are still millions of buddhists in india. Your narrative has just been destroyed.


Here is another fact: Pakistan has more poverty and rapes per capita than india.
Tutty mentality strikes again!
I bet you have never been in Pakistan and you make this stupid assumption out your rear.
Unlike indians "misogynists" , Pakistanis are defensive of their women. Come to Pakistan and try to harass a woman and let's see what happens to you.
 
.
like i said many south asian buddhists also practiced variations of hinduism. NO part of south asia except lanka and parts of nepal and ne india were majority buddhist. There have also been many hindu idols discovered in pakistan and afghanistan, so your point is invalid.

And how many buddhists are left in muslim pakistan and afghanistan? As I have shown, there are still millions of buddhists in india. Your narrative has just been destroyed.


Here is another fact: Pakistan has more poverty and rapes per capita than india.

Cool strawman bro.

Again, Indus valley was Buddhist until they were forced to convert to Hinduism.
When Muslims came there were only Hindus left.

As to how many Buddhist in Pakistan? 0 because they were forced to become Hindus by the time Muslims arrived.

And remember that time the whole world was reporting about the rape crisis in Pakistan?

Yeah, no, because India is rapeistan, not Pakistan.
 
.
Cool strawman bro.

Again, Indus valley was Buddhist until they were forced to convert to Hinduism.
When Muslims came there were only Hindus left.

As to how many Buddhist in Pakistan? 0 because they were forced to become Hindus by the time Muslims arrived.

And remember that time the whole world was reporting about the rape crisis in Pakistan?

Yeah, no, because India is rapeistan, not Pakistan.
Do you have any proof of that? Or do you just want to convince yourself that Pakistan has had nothing to do with India or Hinduism.

Tutty mentality strikes again!
I bet you have never been in Pakistan and you make this stupid assumption out your rear.
Unlike indians "misogynists" , Pakistanis are defensive of their women. Come to Pakistan and try to harass a woman and let's see what happens to you.
I never knew you like tutti frutti so much.
And no, I have never been to Pakistan. I would like to though, since my mother's family migrated from Sindh.
 
.
Do you have any proof of that? Or do you just want to convince yourself that Pakistan has had nothing to do with India or Hinduism.
Proof is that the remaining buddhists sided with Muslims against tutty mentality.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom