BRICS Emerges as the World's Largest GDP Bloc, Overtaking G7, Propelled by China's Rapid Expansion

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

BRICS and SCO are not really supposed to be about bloc politics at all.


They are both mostly focused on trade and trying to bypass western coercion.


It's not a military alliance, so weakness makes no real difference.


China did not abandon the Soviet Union even after it was broken apart.


China has good relations with Russia and Ukraine.


The problem with India is that it is literally shouting from the rooftops begging to become a U.S. proxy targeted directly at China.

China abandoned USSR even before it was balkanized.

China made a mistake to go back to Russia.

Russia is already on life support and will get balkanized in the next 1 year.

The problem with India is that it is literally shouting from the rooftops begging to become a U.S. proxy targeted directly at China.

India is a slave of the West.

It will get balkanized in the next couple of years.

 

[Communism]

China abandoned USSR even before it was balkanized.

China made a mistake to go back to Russia.

Russia is already on life support and will get balkanized in the next 1 year.

It was the USSR that abandoned China.


Unlike Indians like you, China does not simply gravitate to power.


China fought against all the colonial powers, including India and the Soviet Union.

India is a slave of the West.

It will get balkanized in the next couple of years.

It will be used as a proxy before it gets balkanized, and that's the problem.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

It was the USSR that abandoned China.

Good. Now you do agree with me that China & USSR parted away.

But China blundered by going back to Russia.

China should have sticked with the West instead of going back to her Ex Lover Russia.

 

[Communism]

Good. Now you do agree with me that China & USSR parted away.

But China blundered by going back to Russia.

China should have sticked with the West instead of going back to her Ex Lover Russia.

It was not China that ruined relations with the West.


It was the West that is trying it's hardest to ruin relations with China.


China is always a proponent of the trade between nations.


China is not and has not picked sides.


That's the whole point of these organizations.


Indians like you don't seem to understand that "picking sides" is literally the whole goal of the Anglo-Saxon colonialists.


They are trying to divide and conquer all countries that are not already direct vassals of the Anglo-Saxon empire.


Out of all the countries, India is the only large country that is throwing itself on its colonial masters to divide the emerging multi-polar order.


Instead of trying to become its own pole, India is trying to become a vassal.


It's truly stunningly dumb.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

It was not China that ruined relations with the West.


It was the West that is trying it's hardest to ruin relations with China.


China is always a proponent of the trade between nations.


China is not and has not picked sides.


That's the whole point of these organizations.


Indians like you don't seem to understand that "picking sides" is literally the whole goal of the Anglo-Saxon colonialists.


They are trying to divide and conquer all countries that are not already direct vassals of the Anglo-Saxon empire.

After all the support West gave to China, China foolishly ditched West to go back to her loser Ex lover Russia to create SCO and BRICS.

What a stupid move by China.

was not China that ruined relations with the West.


It was the West that is trying it's hardest to ruin relations with China.


China is always a proponent of the trade between nations.


China is not and has not picked sides.


That's the whole point of these organizations.

You cannot take money from your current boy friend (West) and give to your ex boy friend (Russia)

It simply won't work.

China made a stupid move to go back to Russia.

 

[Communism]

After all the support West gave to China, China foolishly ditched West to go back to her loser Ex lover Russia to create SCO and BRICS.

What a stupid move by China.

Indians always have such a warped view of reality.


It was China that drove development in it's own country.


It did so through attracting foreign capital.


Most of that capital did not come from the U.S..


The U.S. literally was trying it's hardest the whole time to stop trading with China, but it was China's gravitational pull on international investors that drew that capital in.


Unlike India, which is trying to become a U.S. vassal due to a totally warped understanding of history, China developed independently of political relations.


It is Western Politics that is driving investment into India, not Western Capital.


Aka, it's the exact opposite.


The West always favored India politically over China, but was not able to force their Capital to light their money on fire in India after the first few times.


Every savvy U.S. investor is still investing in China instead of India.


Only the dumb money in the U.S. is investing into India, sacrificed by their political leaders.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

It was China that drove development in it's own country.

And those results were dismal untill China made pact with the US in 1972

It did so through attracting foreign capital.

You could not have done that without the support of the West to allow you to join WTO.

Most of that capital did not come from the U.S..

West follows the US leadership.

It is Western Politics that is driving investment into India, not Western Capital.

Companies leaving China are going South East Asia and not to India.

 

[Communism]

And those results were dismal untill China made pact with the US in 1972



You could not have done that without the support of the West to allow you to join WTO.




West follows the US leadership.



Companies leaving China are going South East Asia and not to India.

The relations between China and the West went from the edge of nuclear war to neutral.


China was never favored by Western political leaders nor was it ever the place that Western political leaders wanted their Capital to be invested into.


China's relationship was always with International Capital, not the political leaders.


It was international capital that forced their political leaders to remain more neutral in their relations with China.


This relative neutrality was all that was required for China and the International Capital.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

The relations between China and the West went from the edge of nuclear war to neutral.


China was never favored by Western political leaders nor was it ever the place that Western political leaders wanted their Capital to be invested into.


China's relationship was always with International Capital, not the political leaders.


It was international capital that forced their political leaders to remain more neutral in their relations with China.


This relative neutrality was all that was required for China and the International Capital.

Political leaders in the West work for their sponsors.

Western political leaders made pacts with China becuase the Western oligarchy put faith in China.

But China back stabbed the Western oligarchy to go bacck to the Russia oligarchy.

It was a stupid move by China.

The sooner China realizes her mistakes and make amends to part away from Russian oligarchy the better for China.

I am a great supporter of China but China blundered by ditching the West to go back to Russia.

Russia is a loser nation which will get balkanized shortly.

China should ditch Russia before it is too late.

 

[Communism]

Political leaders in the West work for their sponsors.

Western political leaders made pacts with China becuase the Western oligarchy put faith in China.

But China back stabbed the Western oligarchy to go bacck to the Russia oligarchy.

It was a stupid move by China.

The sooner China realizes her mistakes and make amends to part away from Russian oligarchy the better for China.

I am a great supporter of China but China blundered by ditching the West to go back to Russia.

Russia is a loser nation which will get balkanized shortly.

China should ditch Russia before it is too late.

Wasting my time trying to explain basic reality to Indian dreamers seems to be a mistake I make constantly on this forum.


That I, as an American in the U.S. have to explain this to delusional Indians is just insane.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

Wasting my time trying to explain basic reality to Indian dreamers seems to be a mistake I make constantly on this forum.


That I, as an American in the U.S. have to explain this to delusional Indians is just insane.

Let me ask you a simple question.

Why did ASML come to China?

Why is ASML now leaving China?

 

[Communism]

Let me ask you a simple question.

Why did ASML come to China?

Why is ASML now leaving China?

You make the mistake of thinking ASML has a real choice.


Huge portions of their basic components are from U.S. monopolies.


People don't seem to have a realistic understanding of the situation in Europe.


The U.S. engineered the crisis in Ukraine specifically to target China.


It was not some accident.


It doesn't matter what China does, those sanctions are going to happen.


Pretending that China had/has any control over any of those actions is simply delusional.


I am a U.S. Geopolitical Analyst.


I am perfectly well aware of what is really happening.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

You make the mistake of thinking ASML has a real choice.


Huge portions of their basic components are from U.S. monopolies.


People don't seem to have a realistic understanding of the situation in Europe.


The U.S. engineered the crisis in Ukraine specifically to target China.


It was not some accident.


It doesn't matter what China does, those sanctions are going to happen.

Good. Now you agree with me that West follows the US leadership.

West invested in China because the US supported it.

West is leaving China because China wanted take the money from the West and give to her ex boy friend Russia.

US will not accept this unfaithfulness from China.

Especially when the US considers Russia as its primary enemy.

China made a huge blunder by going back to Russia.

 

[Communism]

Good. Now you agree with me that West follows the US leadership.

West invested in China because the US supported it.

West is leaving China because China wanted take the money from the West and give to her ex boy friend Russia.

US will not accept this unfaithfulness from China.

Especially when the US considers Russia as its primary enemy.

China made a huge blunder by going back to Russia.

The West is targeting Russia explicitly because Russia is seen as aligned with China.


If Russia was not seen as aligned with China, the West would not be targeting Russia.


You have the situation backwards.


Russia being seen wanting some sovereignty is seen as Russia aligning with China.


Russia was/is literally a U.S. vassal state that slipped its chains.


This is why the primary goal is Regime Change in Russia, due to the delusional U.S. belief that Putin is some anti-west figure in Russia.


All the opposition in Russia that has any significant support is less pro-west than putin.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

The West is targeting Russia explicitly because Russia is seen as aligned with China.


If Russia was not seen as aligned with China, the West would not be targeting Russia.


You have the situation backwards.


Russia being seen wanting some sovereignty is seen as Russia aligning with China.


Russia was/is literally a U.S. vassal state that slipped its chains.

Wrong.

Why was NATO expanding to the Eastern Europe? to confront China or Russia?

Russia has always been the primary enemy of the West.

West had no issues with China until China back stabbed the West to go back to Russia to create the Shanghai Five in 2001.