What's new

BREAKING: North Korea has Conducted a Nuclear Test

.
You know, Modi recently reshuffled his cabinet because the economy is getting worse. If things turn out really bad, he might try to divert attention by performing a test. I am getting so restless... :D
 
.
You know, Modi recently reshuffled his cabinet because the economy is getting worse. If things turn out really bad, he might try to divert attention by performing a test. I am getting so restless... :D

That possibility is 0
 
.
too much dust surrounding the test. I will not betmy dime for the h bomb though until I have solid reason to do so. And I wouldn't trust Trump or Kim either no matter how much either of them shout.
 
.
Does not matter at all. Does it change the fact that a 120 kt device has been tested and seismic stations across the world recorded an earth quake of 5.8 on Richter scale?

Sir, wouldn't the earthquake scale depend on the condition of earth in the area? Hard igneous rocks would give a different response to other types of rocks. And in the case of Pokhran, well LOLz they performed the test below normal ground I think.

That possibility is 0

Do you mean probability?
 
.
So if a 100 kt is not a successful h-bomb then a device with 2.67 time less yield that means it even its fission boosted stage did not work and no fusion took place at all.
Which version is more palatable for you that (1) NK tested a valid H-bomb or (2) pokhran-II failed comprehensively ?
 
.
Sir, wouldn't the earthquake scale depend on the condition of earth in the area? Hard igneous rocks would give a different response to other types of rocks. And in the case of Pokhran, well LOLz they performed the test below normal ground I think.



Do you mean probability?
Feasibility, odds, prospects & possibility all combined.

Its not gonna happen.
If it did. I will leave PDF.
 
.
Sir, wouldn't the earthquake scale depend on the condition of earth in the area? Hard igneous rocks would give a different response to other types of rocks. And in the case of Pokhran, well LOLz they performed the test below normal ground I think.
A valid question... but I think have algorithms to account for distance, condition of the earth and depth etc. However I still think that Seismic stations are not the most accurate instruments for measuring earth quake.
 
.
So if a 100 kt is not a successful h-bomb then a device with 2.67 time less yield that means it even its fission boosted stage did not work and no fusion took place at all.
Which version is more palatable for you that (1) NK tested a valid H-bomb or (2) pokhran-II failed comprehensively ?

The crucial thingy here is divided into 2.

1) How much maal went into the test device.
2) How much underwent the fission thereof.

DEFCON types wont know this.

The yield is dependent upon these two factors.
 
.
Feasibility, odds, prospects & possibility all combined.

Its not gonna happen.
If it did. I will leave PDF.

LOLz. That got you concerned. I think you underestimate the psychosis of corrupt politicians when their power is threatened. A self-serving man will do anything to hang on to power.
 
.
LOLz. That got you concerned. I think you underestimate the psychosis of corrupt politicians when their power is threatened. A self-serving man will do anything to hang on to power.

The man already has the power and is not dependent upon tests.
 
. . .
As the economy sinks because of his follies, so shall his power. You have a firecracker sitting on your heads. :D

I know this man.
Trust me.
Japan, Canada, Australia and US would kick India to curb, once this thing happened.
No way.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom