Blood telegram: Nixon, Kissinger and a forgotten Genocide (1971)

[Pakistani shaheens]

sources please.

Your own politicians admitted that they had played a crucial role in this episode. And one of your key general in this war even said that we use to blend among the mukhti bahini and that india fully supported mukhti bahini and in detaching East Pakistan from us. And this was the exact thing what you guys did in srilanka, but unfortunately you guys failed

 

[gslv mk3]

Your own politicians admitted that they had played a crucial role in this episode. And one of your key general in this war even said that we use to blend among the mukhti bahini and that india fully supported mukhti bahini and in detaching East Pakistan from us.

the link for executions,I meant.

 

[Pakistani shaheens]

the link for executions,I meant.

BBC News - Controversial book accuses Bengalis of 1971 war crimes
India Invaded Pakistan In 1971: Know The Facts, And The Enemy
India behind the Fall of Dhaka
Freedom First Magazine | The monthly journal of the Indian Committee for Cultural Freedom

 

[gslv mk3]

BBC News - Controversial book accuses Bengalis of 1971 war crimes
India Invaded Pakistan In 1971: Know The Facts, And The Enemy
India behind the Fall of Dhaka
Freedom First Magazine | The monthly journal of the Indian Committee for Cultural Freedom

no reliable sources ?

Sarmila Bose ?Even Bangladeshis have kicked her ***

''India has a long-gone history of many centuries, based upon religious prejudice against the Muslims.

Hindus give credit to Indira Gandhi who in the late 1970s gave RAW a new role to suit her ‘Indira Doctrine’'

pure BS

 

[Pakistani shaheens]

no reliable sources ?

Sarmila Bose ?Even Bangladeshis have kicked her ***

''India has a long-gone history of many centuries, based upon religious prejudice against the Muslims.

Hindus give credit to Indira Gandhi who in the late 1970s gave RAW a new role to suit her ‘Indira Doctrine’'

pure BS

yes as long as its against india, its BS
Have you ever imagined how many non bengalis were killed by indian aided terrorists mukhti bahini. Obviously you people will close your eyes towards the atrocities your people did to non bengalis. I am not saying bengalis were not killed but the thing is why you guys not putting the non bengalis killing into the consideration? And why are you guys not accepting the bare fact that mukhti bahini was indian aided terrorists and sole character who flamed these riots, despite your own general VK singh admitted that he backed mukhti bahini in carrying out 1971 incidence.

Indian Support of Mukti Bahini Guerrillas (Documents from the U.S. National Archives)

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

We don't derive credibility by maligning Pakistan - Pakistan is doing a mighty good job of that on its own these days. But it is a fact that your army committed large scale atrocities in Bangladesh, before rushing to the Indian army for protection from vengeful crowds.

And those are yet to be proved after almost 5 decades ? Amusing isn't it? As to attrocities your militarybis doing a fine job in your own country Aswell as on peacekeeping missions... Now please carry on with your usual nonsense ..

This was my introduction to Pakistani affairs.

You can see that the White House and State Department split on this issue. So did the Pakistani diplomatic community, many of whom had learned of their Army's orders. Anguished Pakistani diplomats could seek counsel neither from the White House nor State Department personnel. So they went knocking on neighbors' doors to talk.

STFU.

yes as long as its against india, its BS
Have you ever imagined how many non bengalis were killed by indian aided terrorists mukhti bahini. Obviously you people will close your eyes towards the atrocities your people did to non bengalis. I am not saying bengalis were not killed but the thing is why you guys not putting the non bengalis killing into the consideration? And why are you guys not accepting the bare fact that mukhti bahini was indian aided terrorists and sole character who flamed these riots, despite your own general VK singh admitted that he backed mukhti bahini in carrying out 1971 incidence.

Indian Support of Mukti Bahini Guerrillas (Documents from the U.S. National Archives)

Read Vk singhs biography ..(didn't read all of it).. He himself admits about lungi wearing indian soldiers shouting "joy bangla".. India was involved directly since March..

 

[gslv mk3]

indian aided terrorists mukhti bahini.

Yes we did support mukhti bahini. They aren't terrorists but revolutionaries struggling against genocide.

As to attrocities your militarybis doing a fine job in your own country Aswell as on peacekeeping missions..

Nowhere close to what PA did during '71.

 

[Jaanbaz]

Why no Indian outrage over genocide of Urdu Speaking Biharis? Was it because they supported Pakistan like any loyal citizen would have? Hypocrisy much? We don't need lesson from India which just elected a leader under whom 2000 people were killed in most brutal ways.

 

[Pakistani shaheens]

Yes we did support mukhti bahini. They aren't terrorists but revolutionaries struggling against genocide.

I know its not the topic here but that means its also right to support freedom fighters of Kashmir who are fighting against atrocities that india commited on them? Am i right or they have become terrorists in this case!

 

[gslv mk3]

The bizarre hypothesis of Sarmila Bose's book is that Pakistani army officers are the most objective source to establish their own innocence.

In fact the interviewee list in her book reveals a distinct selection bias. In Pakistan, she interviewed 30 Pakistani army officers, and three civilians.

In addition four Pakistani army officers are listed as not agreeing to give interviews. So her pool of "expert knowledge" on the Pakistani army's actions failed to include anyone from Pakistan who has publicly said there was a genocide.

She also relies heavily on Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report, which was done by the post-1971 Pakistan government with the intention of white-washing the war.

Dr Bose takes some gaps in the popular narrative, and then pushes it to an extreme to argue that 1971 was a war between two equally violent sides, with the Pakistan army using only justified and temperate amounts of retaliatory force.

BBC News - Controversial book accuses Bengalis of 1971 war crimes

I know its not the topic here but that means its also right to support freedom fighters of Kashmir who are fighting against atrocities that india commited on them?

NO.

 

[Pakistani shaheens]

Read Vk singhs biography ..(didn't read all of it).. He himself admits about lungi wearing indian soldiers shouting "joy bangla".. India was involved directly since March..

Yes sir! india was involved in this game long before when they officially proclaimed war against us. they braced mukhti bahini other wise BD would still be part of Pakistan.

 

[Solomon2]

STFU.

Why the rudeness?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Why the rudeness?

Why ? Should I praise you for your propoganda and pathetic diatribes ?

The bizarre hypothesis of Sarmila Bose's book is that Pakistani army officers are the most objective source to establish their own innocence.

In fact the interviewee list in her book reveals a distinct selection bias. In Pakistan, she interviewed 30 Pakistani army officers, and three civilians.

In addition four Pakistani army officers are listed as not agreeing to give interviews. So her pool of "expert knowledge" on the Pakistani army's actions failed to include anyone from Pakistan who has publicly said there was a genocide.

She also relies heavily on Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report, which was done by the post-1971 Pakistan government with the intention of white-washing the war.

Dr Bose takes some gaps in the popular narrative, and then pushes it to an extreme to argue that 1971 was a war between two equally violent sides, with the Pakistan army using only justified and temperate amounts of retaliatory force.

BBC News - Controversial book accuses Bengalis of 1971 war crimes



NO.

She also relies of bangladeshi officers,Bangladeshi victims,Bangladeshs accused of war crimes and even Bengali officers who remained loyal to Pakistan ? Accounts of international journalists,news headlines etc?? She shows Both sides of the coin .. Officers who were there and witnesses what they saw!

Have you even read the book?

 

[gslv mk3]

She also relies of bangladeshi officers,Bangladeshi victims,Bangladeshs accused of war crimes and even Bengali officers who remained loyal to Pakistan

That wasn't my comment.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

That wasn't my comment.

Do read it .. And war and succession .. Both of these gives accounts of the same events from both sides..