What's new

Beijing feels the pinch of Pakistan’s volatility

Status
Not open for further replies.
"The authorities in China’s troubled Xinjiang region charged Monday that the leader of the first of two lethal assaults over the weekend had trained in Pakistan, an unusually specific accusation that could hint at growing Chinese impatience with Pakistan’s inability to control radical groups operating within its borders. "

Do you think Xinjiang authorities gave statements without the knowledge of higher authorities ?

China has got it finally.

It took 10 years for USA to understand this after the OBL raid. I'm glad that China did not take that long.
 
"The authorities in China’s troubled Xinjiang region charged Monday that the leader of the first of two lethal assaults over the weekend had trained in Pakistan, an unusually specific accusation that could hint at growing Chinese impatience with Pakistan’s inability to control radical groups operating within its borders. "

Do you think Xinjiang authorities gave statements without the knowledge of higher authorities ?

LOL, you must have trouble reading.

Even your own quote shows there has been no accusation from China towards the Pakistani state. :lol:

In fact, China actually praised Pakistan, in an official statement from our national government.
 
I'm sure China will not attack on the training camps located in Pakistan. I guess only USA can do it.
 
LOL, you must have trouble reading.

Even your own quote shows there has been no accusation from China towards the Pakistani state. :lol:

In fact, China actually praised Pakistan, in an official statement from our national government.

Well, they did mention "Pakistan" in their charge. Read again, this time remove green glasses ! You say that the accusation of Kashgar authorities is unofficial. Fair enough !!
 
Becharay indians phir roo rahay hain.

images
 
The fact is that many terrorists are being trained in Pakistan including Arab, Libyan, Afghan, Egyptian, Uzbek, Tajik and Chinese. According to Pakistan Army, they are taking steps against Islamic movement of East Turkistan. But more efforts are needed. However, Pakistan state is not running any anti-China activity.
 
TROLL!!!


Ignore him.


On August 1, China accused Pakistan of enabling citizens of Uighur Muslim origin in its western province of Xinjiang to get training in terror. And only last May China had extolled Pakistan and had said that the world was unfair to the Islamabad regime. Pakistan then was under worldwide condemnation for giving protection to Osama bin Laden soon after US commandos shot him dead in Abbottabad.

In the wake of worldwide criticism of Pakistan and its Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s visit to Beijing, China had offered 50 fighter jets to friend Pakistan. Not only that, Beijing had also warned the US not to do another Abbottabad. Several Chinese commentators have claimed that “Pakistan is the only nation that China can trust in an Asia where Beijing is encircled by US allies including India”.

It is no longer a secret that powerful sections of the Pakistani establishment are hand-in-glove with these terror organisations and, in fact, nurture them as an instrument of Pakistan’s security and global perspective. This should be considered a warning to all the world that in Pakistan, whatever be the official policy, the reality is that Islamist jihadis are firmly entrenched and their interests take precedence over every other consideration.

After the US punishment of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan following the Al-Qaeda operation on 9/11, several jihadi activists in Afghanistan were detained first by the US forces and then released. Most of them took refuge in Pakistan. Interrogation reports on them have now been released by WikiLeaks. They reveal how Pakistani terrorists were recruiting from these Chinese Islamist nationals since 2001 and were training them to cause terror activities in the Xinjiang province of China.

If that is the situation, it is somewhat puzzling that the Chinese now have come out publicly about the Pakistani terror machine reaching out to the ethnically troubled western province. One reason could be that the Chinese now believe that the Islamist ideology could have a strong influence in that area with its Muslim majority. It is now known that a section of the Pakistan army had planned a coup in Islamabad in collusion with the jihadi organisations but the army put it down with the arrest of a number of its lower level officers involved in the conspiracy over the head of the top generals.

How Pakistan’s longterm other ally, the US, viewed the reliability of the Pakistani establishment is clear from the recent revelation. When Washington considered asking the Pakistan government to cooperate with it for the capture of Osama bin Laden after he was spotted in Abbottabad, President Obama struck it down as “there was a real lack of confidence that the Pakistanis would keep this secret for more than a nano-second”, as has been revealed by the New Yorker report on the anti-bin Laden operation details.

It is possible that Beijing too might have begun to have second thoughts about trusting Pakistan beyond a limit. For China, however, Pakistan continues to offer a willing subordinate to join with it to achieve their common aim of disrupting Indian interests in the region. Hence Beijing would not give up on Islamabad.

In our South Block, there should be a realisation that the longterm aims of Pakistan perclude any attempt at lasting peace in the subcontinent so long as that country is in the strong grip of Islamist jihadis. In New Delhi, the government often bends backward to accommodate Pakistan, justifying such a move with the plea that it is in India’s interest to support the civilian government in Pakistan.

But this is chasing the proverbial mirage. For all practical purposes, it is a combine of the jihadi elements and the army that decide what the civilian government should do even though sometimes the army acts against selected jihadi organisations when there is a conflict of interest between the two. Beijing itself is getting increasingly aware of the volatility in Islamabad. Better late than never.

Beijing feels the pinch of Pakistan
 
On August 1, China accused Pakistan of enabling citizens of Uighur Muslim origin in its western province of Xinjiang to get training in terror. And only last May China had extolled Pakistan and had said that the world was unfair to the Islamabad regime. Pakistan then was under worldwide condemnation for giving protection to Osama bin Laden soon after US commandos shot him dead in Abbottabad.

In the wake of worldwide criticism of Pakistan and its Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s visit to Beijing, China had offered 50 fighter jets to friend Pakistan. Not only that, Beijing had also warned the US not to do another Abbottabad. Several Chinese commentators have claimed that “Pakistan is the only nation that China can trust in an Asia where Beijing is encircled by US allies including India”.

It is no longer a secret that powerful sections of the Pakistani establishment are hand-in-glove with these terror organisations and, in fact, nurture them as an instrument of Pakistan’s security and global perspective. This should be considered a warning to all the world that in Pakistan, whatever be the official policy, the reality is that Islamist jihadis are firmly entrenched and their interests take precedence over every other consideration.

After the US punishment of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan following the Al-Qaeda operation on 9/11, several jihadi activists in Afghanistan were detained first by the US forces and then released. Most of them took refuge in Pakistan. Interrogation reports on them have now been released by WikiLeaks. They reveal how Pakistani terrorists were recruiting from these Chinese Islamist nationals since 2001 and were training them to cause terror activities in the Xinjiang province of China.

If that is the situation, it is somewhat puzzling that the Chinese now have come out publicly about the Pakistani terror machine reaching out to the ethnically troubled western province. One reason could be that the Chinese now believe that the Islamist ideology could have a strong influence in that area with its Muslim majority. It is now known that a section of the Pakistan army had planned a coup in Islamabad in collusion with the jihadi organisations but the army put it down with the arrest of a number of its lower level officers involved in the conspiracy over the head of the top generals.

How Pakistan’s longterm other ally, the US, viewed the reliability of the Pakistani establishment is clear from the recent revelation. When Washington considered asking the Pakistan government to cooperate with it for the capture of Osama bin Laden after he was spotted in Abbottabad, President Obama struck it down as “there was a real lack of confidence that the Pakistanis would keep this secret for more than a nano-second”, as has been revealed by the New Yorker report on the anti-bin Laden operation details.

It is possible that Beijing too might have begun to have second thoughts about trusting Pakistan beyond a limit. For China, however, Pakistan continues to offer a willing subordinate to join with it to achieve their common aim of disrupting Indian interests in the region. Hence Beijing would not give up on Islamabad.

In our South Block, there should be a realisation that the longterm aims of Pakistan perclude any attempt at lasting peace in the subcontinent so long as that country is in the strong grip of Islamist jihadis. In New Delhi, the government often bends backward to accommodate Pakistan, justifying such a move with the plea that it is in India’s interest to support the civilian government in Pakistan.

But this is chasing the proverbial mirage. For all practical purposes, it is a combine of the jihadi elements and the army that decide what the civilian government should do even though sometimes the army acts against selected jihadi organisations when there is a conflict of interest between the two. Beijing itself is getting increasingly aware of the volatility in Islamabad. Better late than never.

Beijing feels the pinch of Pakistan

In regards to the smart conpiracy being hatched by Israel, India, UK and US to create mistrust between the two brother countries(Pak &China) we got an excellent plan too. the above countries are jealous of us and consider us threat to their evil interests. We are going to create more stronger bond by giving China Military bases in Gwader and in the Tribal areas of Pakistan to wipe out the terrorists trained by the CIA/Mosaad/RAW/MI6 and secretly sent within Pakistan and China to destroy our peace...... That move will expose all the evil games of the US and its allies within the region and destroy their evil interests......Insha-Allah........:)
 
On August 1, China accused Pakistan of enabling citizens of Uighur Muslim origin in its western province of Xinjiang to get training in terror. And only last May China had extolled Pakistan and had said that the world was unfair to the Islamabad regime. Pakistan then was under worldwide condemnation for giving protection to Osama bin Laden soon after US commandos shot him dead in Abbottabad.

In the wake of worldwide criticism of Pakistan and its Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s visit to Beijing, China had offered 50 fighter jets to friend Pakistan. Not only that, Beijing had also warned the US not to do another Abbottabad. Several Chinese commentators have claimed that “Pakistan is the only nation that China can trust in an Asia where Beijing is encircled by US allies including India”.

It is no longer a secret that powerful sections of the Pakistani establishment are hand-in-glove with these terror organisations and, in fact, nurture them as an instrument of Pakistan’s security and global perspective. This should be considered a warning to all the world that in Pakistan, whatever be the official policy, the reality is that Islamist jihadis are firmly entrenched and their interests take precedence over every other consideration.

After the US punishment of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan following the Al-Qaeda operation on 9/11, several jihadi activists in Afghanistan were detained first by the US forces and then released. Most of them took refuge in Pakistan. Interrogation reports on them have now been released by WikiLeaks. They reveal how Pakistani terrorists were recruiting from these Chinese Islamist nationals since 2001 and were training them to cause terror activities in the Xinjiang province of China.

If that is the situation, it is somewhat puzzling that the Chinese now have come out publicly about the Pakistani terror machine reaching out to the ethnically troubled western province. One reason could be that the Chinese now believe that the Islamist ideology could have a strong influence in that area with its Muslim majority. It is now known that a section of the Pakistan army had planned a coup in Islamabad in collusion with the jihadi organisations but the army put it down with the arrest of a number of its lower level officers involved in the conspiracy over the head of the top generals.

How Pakistan’s longterm other ally, the US, viewed the reliability of the Pakistani establishment is clear from the recent revelation. When Washington considered asking the Pakistan government to cooperate with it for the capture of Osama bin Laden after he was spotted in Abbottabad, President Obama struck it down as “there was a real lack of confidence that the Pakistanis would keep this secret for more than a nano-second”, as has been revealed by the New Yorker report on the anti-bin Laden operation details.

It is possible that Beijing too might have begun to have second thoughts about trusting Pakistan beyond a limit. For China, however, Pakistan continues to offer a willing subordinate to join with it to achieve their common aim of disrupting Indian interests in the region. Hence Beijing would not give up on Islamabad.

In our South Block, there should be a realisation that the longterm aims of Pakistan perclude any attempt at lasting peace in the subcontinent so long as that country is in the strong grip of Islamist jihadis. In New Delhi, the government often bends backward to accommodate Pakistan, justifying such a move with the plea that it is in India’s interest to support the civilian government in Pakistan.

But this is chasing the proverbial mirage. For all practical purposes, it is a combine of the jihadi elements and the army that decide what the civilian government should do even though sometimes the army acts against selected jihadi organisations when there is a conflict of interest between the two. Beijing itself is getting increasingly aware of the volatility in Islamabad. Better late than never.

Beijing feels the pinch of Pakistan

you people lives in dream........think that who was the mastermind of AL-CIADA .........from last three or four months there is no bomb blast in Pakistan coz we strat kicking out all ........agents......hopefully u need some rest.......:china::pakistan::blah:
 
I knew someone would call this a conspiracy by India USA and Israel. lol
 
Poor indian their destiny is crying over and over and over :lol:
 
Who is lying ??

China Blames Foreign-Trained Separatists for Attacks in Xinjiang

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/world/asia/02china.html

China did accuse Pakistan of training Uighurs. But then it suddenly remembered that Pakistan is their ally ! Hence the turn around !

China praises Pakistan, downplaying risk of rift | Pakistan | DAWN.COM


CD, your love for Pakistan is unquestionable. But can not say the same thing about your Govt !

Do you problem with comprehending simple English? China blamed foreign-trained separatists trained in Pakistan. Does that mean they're accusing the Pakistani state? No, they're accusing non-state actors that have nothing to do with the Pakistani state.
 
But it is a fact that terrorists training in Pakistan can hurt Pakistan image. However, we should wait for the US leave from the Afghanistan and Iraq.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom