now my friend on allied thing isnt u who makes everything for whites and heavily depend on them (made in china)
and u mean to say in order to be bhai bhai with u we have to be friend with pakistan(accepting their conditions offcourse) no matter wat they do then sorry forget it then.
...
and about defending pakistan on war with india we will see tat when happens
Now on this note you my friend should have no illusions. Whatever the difference between me and the brigands, prof got one thing right, which is that PRC won't sell out Pak's core interest just to export a few more trinkets to the Indian middle class - whether the former continue to service the "whites" or not.
I personally would like to see a three-way peace deal in South Asia. No one asks India to cater to anybody's "whim". But there has to be a strategic stand-down between India and Pakistan before there could be real stand-down between PRC and India. I firmly hold this personal opinion.
And I disagree emphatically with the professor chicken hawk on India's cozying up to the Yanks. Who cares? Let the Saffron concubines snuggle up. It's good for everyone in the long run and I am perfectly serious.
But professor evidently holds the opinion that of all members of the "harem", he gets to monopolize the attention of his "Sultan". If you disagree with him, well then you are a "jew" I know - don't ask me. I can't be responsible for his limited vocabulary.
and on nukes who cares how much nuke u have the bottom line is we have nukes and 50-60 looks good to me cause havoc in any part of the world
Well by then rest assured the chicken-hawks will be back to roost in the "Sultan's" own harem - on the other side of the ocean ...
So he won't be facing no nukes - just you and the "Chinese" Chinese.