Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly and by doing so what are you attempting to do? Effectively shut down a discussion ? But I thought we have "freedom of speech" hay rabba, an kya ho ga kaka?Exactly why I reminded everyone of editorial policies and how they affect the topic of this thread.
The APS reopening was covered by just about every major media outlet, not just BBC.
This is why people like you received so much eyes-rolling.I am saying be safe than sorry...
I asked a question I read in some article why people draw something they dont know or know will hurt someone? Why provoke?
Well there goes your freedom of speech.
People need to not just use Google, but be able to comprehend how editorial policies and guidelines can affect what a reporter may or may not say on the job.
Am I? Am I the one who had to bring in children?@Akheilos You are being way too emotional and missing the points I was trying to make.
If it is ordinary then why hush away those about Jews and Israeli bombing? is that not worthy to be drawn attention to? Or what about BOKO HARAM or any other extremist?Expressing your opinions by drawing cartoons in West is something as normal and as ordinary as going to school in Pakistan. So you can't advice neither not to do so by saying something like "better safe than sorry".
Capital letters are for emphasis!By the way, please use less capital letters and don't get personal. Thank you.
What are those laws ?you cannot say anything against jew and Israel, some countries have laws against it and you will end up in jail, which is fine by me, no one should say anything about any religion but the problem is French govt was giving funds to Charlie Hebdo to keep them in circulation.
What are those laws ?
In other words, you have no idea of what you are talking about.There were talks of a Law being presented in Canadian house to make it a crime to speak against Israel, dont know if it was passed or not.
In other words, you have no idea of what you are talking about.
And Terrorist are rational? Lovely! Then why does FBI have dont negotiate with rational beings?This is why people like you received so much eyes-rolling.
So what if it is stupid to provoke ? We are not talking about provoking an animal where it is ruled by instincts and not rational thoughts. If I poke at a hornet's nest, then I deserved to be stung.
None of that challenge JESUS if he slept with Madeline or not try bringing that inBut we are talking about human beings who create provocative ideas. Islam, like all religions, are provocative. Early Christianity challenged/provoked Judaism. Today's Mormons challenged/provoked mainstream Christians. Marxism challenged/provoked democrats. And the list of provocative ideas goes on and on...
Whom did it hurt?So if there is a provocative idea, there will be those who will challenge/provoke in return, whether the challenger is a priest from the other religion or a cartoonist who challenge/provoke everyone.
I can also ask: Why create Islam when Muhammad do not know his new religion will hurt someone ?
I am merely providing the facts relevant to the discussion, that is all. A discussion that ignores relevant facts may be cathartic, but not very fruitful.
Of course terrorists are rational actors. Just because their beliefs are extreme, that does not mean HOW they came to that extreme were irrational. You should roll your eyes at your own bad argument.And Terrorist are rational? Lovely! Then why does FBI have dont negotiate with rational beings?
I see the eyes rolling now
You think people have not presented that ?None of that challenge JESUS if he slept with Madeline or not try bringing that in
THAT would be real provocation!
It hurts the Christians' and the Jews' feelings.Whom did it hurt?
Maybe the question can be equally posed to Christianity?
Why did Jesus call himself god that hurt the Jews soo much they crucified him!
What about Judaism? Give up your cow idol for 1 god of Abraham?