What's new

Bangladesh will be the nuclear country?

Status
Not open for further replies.
For me no.

We need to have parity with India and be able to strike all Indian territory as they can strike all Bangladeshi territory.

However the ability to strike New Delhi and Mumbai are absolute musts.

Israel, India's bust buddy will surely come for India's help when BD will unleash her power - how you are gonna deter it with missile range just to reach Delhi or Mumbai
 
.
For me no.

We need to have parity with India and be able to strike all Indian territory as they can strike all Bangladeshi territory.

However the ability to strike New Delhi and Mumbai are absolute musts.

For that parity to obtain you'll be needing an indigenous delivery system, for no country will sell you a missile more than 300 kms range.. You have two challenges, a bomb and an effective delivery system.

Israel, India's bust buddy will surely come for India's help when BD will unleash her power - how you are gonna deter it with missile range just to reach Delhi or Mumbai

ICBM too on the list...
 
.
ICBM too on the list...

My bad - I missed that one. In that case we should forget India as enemy as BD will deal with her. We must start focusing on other hidden enemies,
 
.
My bad - I missed that one. In that case we should forget India as enemy as BD will deal with her. We must start focusing on other hidden enemies,

Actually you should not worry about India , Israel (since they will come to aid India) and USA (since US will come to aid Israel). Super Power Bangladesh will deal with the above 3 countries in one go.
 
.
Even if we don't acquire nukes at the very least we need a ballistic arsenal that can cover all of India.

If it is true that Musharraf turned Pakistani missiles on Bangladesh during the Awami League period then, missiles that can also reciprocate that.

Other than that we should concentrate on economic growth.

Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Brunei none of them have nukes and are doing fine.

This is BS. Why in the world we will turn our missiles towards BD.
 
.
Actually you should not worry about India , Israel (since they will come to aid India) and USA (since US will come to aid Israel). Super Power Bangladesh will deal with the above 3 countries in one go.

They are talking about ICBM when Bangladesh has yet to develop a 100 km missile.
 
.
My bad - I missed that one. In that case we should forget India as enemy as BD will deal with her. We must start focusing on other hidden enemies,

Absolutely, frets for us will diminish considerably. Yeah, that will not only help us extending our spectrum but also will help reducing size of our budget dedicated for R&D.
 
.
we already have lots of problems. nuclear bomb is going 2 make the situation worse.

n that article writer pretty girl is a very much anti muslim minded person if u ask me

peace :tup:
 
.
we already have lots of problems. nuclear bomb is going 2 make the situation worse.

n that article writer pretty girl is a very much anti muslim minded person if u ask me

peace :tup:

Shahzaday! have she rejected your proposal?
 
.
I posted that pic for one reason, that b'coz of it atleast this thread be viewed as even the THOUGHT of BD making nukes sounds idiotic, but i m shocked how seriously many SENIOR MEMBERS are responding to this thread which is based on an interview of some girl who hardly has any credibility, i have some important points to make & if members here are matured enough to see it through a rational perspective than read my points, otherwise consider me as another Hindutva Troll (accused lately of :lol:) or whatever u want:

1. Nuclear weapons were first made around 67 years ago, now making few nukes by ANY country is not a rocket science anymore BUT it has many dimensions to it - Economic (a nuclear weapon takes millions of dollars to build & millions more to keep it safely for it's lifetime), Political (making nukes result in political actions such as sanctions, case being IRAN & NK), Diplomatic (BD has just two neighbors, yes u have found a new "All weather Friend", but fact remains that one cannot change one's neighbors, so why affect the relations with the only two neighbors that BD has, if BD becomes a casualty of Global Warming it will be the neighbors that will help it not others), military (this is important, India is already surrounded by 2 nuclear weapon states, now u like it or not but India will not allow it's another neighbor to build one, whatever it takes, it may even get support by US if it decides to act militarily).

2. Purpose - Every nuclear weapon state currently has some or the other purpose to remain so, be it Pak or be it India, they have real threats, but what threat BD has?? only India as a neighbor of BD has nukes & declared NFU policy, than why embark on a journey that will take away precious resources of BD just to show the world that we can make them.

3. Infrastructure - Building nukes is not that important than building supporting infrastructure & delivery mechanism for it, be it missiles, enrichment facilities, ac etc. look at the eg. of Pak, it spends $ 2 billion every year for building nukes & it's support infrastructure, does BD which is one of the poorest countries on earth has this much money??
 
.
- BSF terrorism
- Water terrorism
- Interference in our domestic affairs
- Spreading false propaganda against Bangladesh etc

Those aren't enough justification for acquiring nukes. Those issues can be solved with diplomacy. Bangladesh hasn't been great at diplomacy part as far as outstanding issues with India are concerned.

Making a "dirty bomb" isn't that hard. However, developing the delivery system is. Missile exports is limited to 300 km range. Although, they can transfer technology.

You know the most difficult part? Politics. Bangladesh couldn't even dodge ICT regulations, nor the Grameen drama, nor the WB drama. It simply doesn't have the clout.

This thread was only meant for general discussion. Nothing too serious :D

Even if we don't acquire nukes at the very least we need a ballistic arsenal that can cover all of India.

If it is true that Musharraf turned Pakistani missiles on Bangladesh during the Awami League period then, missiles that can also reciprocate that.

Other than that we should concentrate on economic growth.

Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Brunei none of them have nukes and are doing fine.

O.O

Myanmar is not a threat.

It isn't.

However, I question their nuclear and chemical weapons program. Who is willing to tolerate a nuclear-armed Myanmar?

I'd be surprised if the US, China and India does tolerate that.

And if that's the case, then in theory, it'd be no problem for Bangladesh :meeting:
 
.
I posted that pic for one reason, that b'coz of it atleast this thread be viewed as even the THOUGHT of BD making nukes sounds idiotic, but i m shocked how seriously many SENIOR MEMBERS are responding to this thread which is based on an interview of some girl who hardly has any credibility, i have some important points to make & if members here are matured enough to see it through a rational perspective than read my points, otherwise consider me as another Hindutva Troll (accused lately of :lol:) or whatever u want:

1. Nuclear weapons were first made around 67 years ago, now making few nukes by ANY country is not a rocket science anymore BUT it has many dimensions to it - Economic (a nuclear weapon takes millions of dollars to build & millions more to keep it safely for it's lifetime), Political (making nukes result in political actions such as sanctions, case being IRAN & NK), Diplomatic (BD has just two neighbors, yes u have found a new "All weather Friend", but fact remains that one cannot change one's neighbors, so why affect the relations with the only two neighbors that BD has, if BD becomes a casualty of Global Warming it will be the neighbors that will help it not others), military (this is important, India is already surrounded by 2 nuclear weapon states, now u like it or not but India will not allow it's another neighbor to build one, whatever it takes, it may even get support by US if it decides to act militarily).

2. Purpose - Every nuclear weapon state currently has some or the other purpose to remain so, be it Pak or be it India, they have real threats, but what threat BD has?? only India as a neighbor of BD has nukes & declared NFU policy, than why embark on a journey that will take away precious resources of BD just to show the world that we can make them.

3. Infrastructure - Building nukes is not that important than building supporting infrastructure & delivery mechanism for it, be it missiles, enrichment facilities, ac etc. look at the eg. of Pak, it spends $ 2 billion every year for building nukes & it's support infrastructure, does BD which is one of the poorest countries on earth has this much money??

You are a jealous bhartii...............:coffee:
 
.
@Loki, sorry for being off topic, why have you got your id changed? Zabanya was good too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Bangladesh would never go nuclear. Any bets here...
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom