roadrunner
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,696
- Reaction score
- 0
MUHHAHAHAHA
Hey man, did not you ever hear of riot in Pakistan? No communal tension? No shia sunni conflict? Somewhere I saw even in Pakistan Muhajer got some problems and people get killed every now and then.
Even if we do take your claim as true, what should be the rule of the army of a country? Should they stop the violence or go in a spree to start one of the heiness genocide in the history of mankind?
See my earlier post, there was not a single incidence of any violence against Biharis after 1971 in the last 38 years in Bangladesh. This track record speaks for itself.
So we're discussing the Bengali killing of Biharis in East Pakistan, and you now go on the defensive and start talking about Pakistan. That's clever, and you're welcome to discuss it on another thread. Let me ask, do you justify murder, by saying, well people in Pakistan do it, so why shouldn't I? That is how you're arguing.
Anyhow, that aside, you claim there's not violence on Biharis, and Bangladeshis feel all love for them since independence. Funny how they're all quarantined in little concentration camps then, isn't it. I suppose you can't get close enough to make anymore incidences of violence against them.
"After independence of Bangladesh the flood gates of oppression opened wider, many thousands more Biharis were killed, all of their homes and businesses were confiscated, they were fired from their jobs, their bank accounts seized, their children expelled from schools and they once more had to seek refuge. International Red Cross created camps to save them from total annihilation. Most did not want to live in Bangladesh after the battering they had received."
Home - Stranded Pakistanis, Biharis, Stateless in Bangladesh and Pakistan
How is that not killing them following independence? That is real discrimination.