Bangladesh bans Maududi's books in mosques

[EgO Boy]

I am no fan of Maulan Maududis philosphy but political opression will not work and is not a good sign for the country. A better idea would be to engage in discussion and I think traditional scholars are the best source to eradicate maududis philosphy.

YOU MEAN OFFICIALLY PAID TRADITIONAL SCHOLARS R THE BEST SOURCE TO ERADICATE " TRUTH ".

 

[Spring Onion]

If so then it should be banned in Pakistan first then Bangladesh. you are not aware what's going on here. Awami taking out all Islam related book from national Masjid library written by prominent Islamic scholars including Maududi. Most of these scholars happen to be affiliated with Jamat politics. It is not done for good cause rather ill political motive.

Tell me can they really ban these book from Bangladesh if people want's to read it?

I have never read Maududi neither a fan of him but its funny how insecure Hassina league is bent upon eliminating everything which it fears falls into rival political group by any mean.

these politically motivated moves only proves that Hassina and Co are so much insecure.

From changing constitution by removing name of Zia to changing names of BD Airport to this maududi books, what a bunch of insecure ruling there

 

[TopCat]

I have never read Maududi neither a fan of him but its funny how insecure Hassina league is bent upon eliminating everything which it fears falls into rival political group by any mean.

these politically motivated moves only proves that Hassina and Co are so much insecure.

BNP, Jamaat used state funding to promote Moududis book through Islamic foundation. So removing those books from state sponsored mosque is a right thing to do when it promotes radicalism. Even with Modudis book in circulation AL secure 3/4 th parliament seats.

From changing constitution by removing name of Zia to changing names of BD Airport to this maududi books, what a bunch of insecure ruling there

Constitution needs to be cleaned up as there are few things altered by military regime which was declared invalid by Supreme court.
BNP changed Chittagong airport name to Shah Amanat airport from its original M. A. Hannan airport and the move by AL now is tit for tat what i diprove.

 

[EgO Boy]

Maududi ideology is based on hatred and religious supremacy for muslims, something that goes against many of the ideals of Islam, I believe it is a good step by the BD govt to ban his works which are poisoning our society...............

NAME 1 MAUDUDI BOOK WHICH SAY'S HATE NON-MUSLIM'S OR ATTACK THEM WITHOUT REASON.

HE ONLY TALK ABOUT THE OBLIGATORY THING'S WHICH EVERY MUSLIM HAS TO FOLLOW ACCORDING TO QURAN AND SUNNAH.

WEATHER HE OR SHE LIKE'S IT OR NOT.

YOUR SOCIETY WILL REMAIN POISNOUS, AS LONG AS U KEEP REJECTING TRUE TEACHING'S OF ISLAM.

WHY UR VERSION OF PEACEFULL ISLAM DID'NT JUST CONDFINED ITS SELF TO MACCA AND MADINA, WHY THEY WENT TO SYRIA, IRAN, EGYPT, SPAIN WITH FLOWER'S IN THERE HAND'S.

EVERY MUSLIM WILL ANSWER HIS OR HER CONTRIBUTION ON JUDGEMENT DAY.

SOME WILL LAUGH THERE WAY TO JANNAH, OTHER'S WILL SCREAM AND BE DRAGED TO HELL.

 

[EgO Boy]

I would really appreciate such a move in Pakistan as well !

BE MY GUEST AND SEE WHAT HAPPEN'S.

 

[EgO Boy]

I WILL END HERE, I HAVE EVERY SINGLE WORD OF MOULANA MAUDUDI'S WORK.

AND IAM NOT A MEMBER OF HIS JAMAAT ISLAMI.

MOULANA IS NOT A PERSON, HE IS A IDEOLOGY BASED ON QURAN AND SUNNAH ONLY.

TRY TO BEAT THAT.

 

[hembo]

No you do not want fascism. It does more harm then good. How would you feel if some want's to banned Allahma Iqbal book in Bangladesh because he wrote from Islamic prospective.

Do mind that these same people dislike him but love Tagore.

That is perhaps because Tagore's book did not preach violent religious hatred vis-avis Maududi's..

 

[hembo]

If you really want to enrich Bangladesh with good literature then you are to read Allama Iqbal, Maulana Rumi and poet like Hafiz. Tagore has no chance against these guys.

Perhaps that is why these guys had won the Nobel prize for literature while Tagore didn't...

No intention to demean any of the great leterates mentioned in the qoute from my side and I respect all of them for their great contribution to mankind.

 

[EjazR]

Ego Boy,
Maududi is not a maulana. He never completedhis studies tobecome a Maulana.

Secondly, who says that political Islam is a more dangerous to non-muslims than muslims? Even now, non-muslims are more likely to die due to a heart attack or car accident than a terrorist attack. Its a different story on how its hyped.

Its the muslims themselves who are the worst sufferrers of this ideology. And no his ideology about revolting against existing establishment and establishing "hukumat-i-ilahi" is nto based onQuran and Sunnha. Infact, another group of people who used these words were those at the time of Ali RA who came to be known as Khariji.

Im not saying that Maududi supported killing of innocent civilians, that was a perversion created by Zawahiri and OBL, but his concept of violent revolution to establish an "Islamic state" follows closely the Commnist revolutionary ideologies except with an Islamic bent.

Also I don't think that JI shouldbe"banned". The political Islamic ideology might notitself contain terrorists but its ideology creates a fertile ground. This is applicableto all religions by the way. And religious nationalist or politco-religious ideology is problematic and dangerous.

 

[Kinetic]

I am not a fan of the way Jamaat conduct its place in Bangladesh national politics but I will point out and challenge followings.

First, Shibir (jamaat student wing) are completely different organization than JMB and HUJI. JMB and HUJI are indian creation, armed and funded by indians.

Second, just finding Moududi's book does not mean one is associated with terrorism. If that is the case then indians are biggest Nazi followers in the world as hitler book has been so popular among indians.

Third, real terror is running by Awami student wing chatra league. Looting, raping, extorting and killing people everyday. But Awami thugs are accusing others for crime they are committing today.

Pathetic India-phobia!!!! This guy can't sleep without thinking about India.

First, Shibir (jamaat student wing) are completely different organization than JMB and HUJI. JMB and HUJI are indian creation, armed and funded by indians.

When shibir cuts the wrists of the people does they forget the rules of Islam???

Where did you get the news that jmb and huji are funded by India? Before making idiotic comments show your source.

Second, just finding Moududi's book does not mean one is associated with terrorism. If that is the case then indians are biggest Nazi followers in the world as hitler book has been so popular among indians.

What a looser!!! moududi's always proposed religious based politics in the name of Islam. What jamaat did to BD, is equally responsibility of moududi!

Third, real terror is running by Awami student wing chatra league. Looting, raping, extorting and killing people everyday. But Awami thugs are accusing others for crime they are committing today.

bnp's student wing chatra dal did worst than this. they are famous only fighting inside college campuses. does that mean bnp is equally responsible for that?

 

[Kinetic]

Brother, they prefer Tagore books over Hadis or Islamic book. Nauzubillah.

BD's national song is written by Tagore and he is the greatest Indian poet ever. So its expected that he is very popular through out the culture and heritage of Bengal both in India and BD.

So don't compare culture and literature with religion.

 

[Kinetic]

And 2ndly, whats wrong Shibir cadre carrying Moududi's book? Does any JI/Shibiries object BJP/VHP walas carrying Bhagabat Gita of Bharati-Nationalistic school?

Don't compare moududi's book with a sacred religious book? Can you compare his books with holy Quran? no. So before talking about other's religion and comparing it with an extremist writer, think about this.

And religious study is strictly banned in Indian schools except the Madrasas (govt funded). No one carrying any religious books in Indian schools. Stop lying.

 

[M_Saint]

M_Saint

Sorry you are not making any sense. where did Tablighis come from? And where JI come from? And in my first post I mentioned that JI-Hind has publicly stated that they don't follow Maududi's philosphy and concept of "establishing Islamic state". And what I told about Wahabbi scholars, its been stated since the 80s by them. And what does Indian media have to do with any of this anyways. They don't follow such theological discussions. Most of your post is all offtopic. Not only that, the same is repeated by scholars in Egypt, Turkey, Indonesia and any other traditional Islamic school.

The only reason why this ideology gained currency was because of extensive support during the cold war by the US and Saudi Arabia to counter communism. Otherwise this was always a fringe ideologyandnot part of the mainstream traditional Islamic thought. Like I said, you have to have an open mind.

By answering your questions and refuting charges, I didn't make sense but you did by side-tracking mine? Circuller Indian logic IMO. Anyway, Both Maulan Illyas (R) and Janab Maududi were born in IND and formed Tableague as well as start writing from there. But Illyas(R) started preaching in Hindu dominated IND and his philosophy was offshots of Deobondi, in which he preferred not to touch social, economical and political fronts. I myself was a Tablighy and after finding its ingredients were synoumous to Syannashism thus Hindutavya's derivates for Sudra-Muslim (As most of converted in IND from lower class) to keep Muslims dumb form becomming social and economical experts, I stopped practicing it . OTH Janab Maududi migrated to PAK and freely nurtured his thoughts to come up with well-balanced interpretation of Islam that was always there. Having said that I would like not to touch your rest of the gibberish as your understanding and knowledge aren't worthy to reply anymore.

 

[M_Saint]

NAME 1 MAUDUDI BOOK WHICH SAY'S HATE NON-MUSLIM'S OR ATTACK THEM WITHOUT REASON.

There isn't any, brother/friend. Most controversial book of his was "Khilifat O Rajtantra(Mulkiat)", where he downgraded Moabia's status as Shahabi because he didn't transfer Khilafat to Ali's bongshadors. His write-ups, research and teachings were disliked by Khanka-Dorgha walas because he called it their bluffs with reasons and logic. Beyond it, some so-called traditionalists didn't like him simply because of their closeness of minds, educational limitation etc. IMO.

 

[EjazR]

M_Saint and EgoBoy

What will you call of a person who wrongly quote references? And not once but multiple times in various books. It cant be a mistake if its done multiple times.

The book that you mentioned Khilafat u Mulokiyat is a book I have read and personally found shocking. And so I actually went to the references that he quoted. The books of history like Ibne Kabir and Ibne Kasir. These books are freely availble in Saudi Arabia where I was at that time and I found that he had wrongly quoted in atleast a few serious charges against various Sahaba.

In the technical field, when a person publishing a paper or books quotes wrongly in his references then all his works are considered doubtful even though some of them might well be accurate. Hope you get my meaning.

You owe it to yourself to go through that book and see the references for yourself and realise this. I have given the info to you, now its your responsibility.


And again I don't understand why Maulana Ilyas and Tablighi movement is coming into this discussion? Is it only because I have an Indian flag? I am not discussing about it because its offtopic, even though as far as I know what you have written is completely untrue. And for all your talk of Quran and Sunnah, you forgot that there is no caste system in Islam, how unfortunate...