What's new

Baloch-Pakhtun rivalry rears its head at CPEC meeting

Going through twitter most Baloch nationalists are in denial about the involvement of BLF/BLA claiming that they would never hurt their Pashtun brethren...as if targeting Punjabi settlers in the past was OK !
But with F.C mostly Pashtun and changing demographics (which they most fear) because of increased Pashtun presence this was as incident waiting to happen !

They all are funded from RAW. Now showing their faithfulness to them.
 
.
The whole Pashtun-Punjabi elite ideal was no generosity by them but rather engineered. With quota systems and nepotism ruling the roost till today. As if the Baloch people are less capable of defending Pakistan or the Sindhis. It only objectifies a mentality that considers certain races more equal than others.

Punjab have 60% of Pakistan population.

"In 2001, the Punjabis constituted over 71 per cent of the army. The numerical strength was reduced in later years and has been brought down to just over 57 per cent this year (2007). A further three per cent decrease in recruitment from that province is on the cards by 2011."


Within a decade (2001-2011), the composition of Pakhtuns in the army would increase by one per cent to 14.5 per cent.

A two per cent increase will be made in the number of Sindhis bringing their total strength to 17 per cent by 2011.

The representation of Balochis, which was nil in 2001, constitutes 3.2 per cent at present. Their composition would be increased to 4 per cent by 2011.

Similarly, with their zero per cent presence in the army seven years ago, the people from Azad Kashmir and Northern Areas now constitute 9.11 per cent of the army. However, their number would be curtailed to 9 per cent in 2011.

Punjab’s dominance in army being reduced: ISPR - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

"Punjab shows an overall decline in recruitment of soldiers from 63.86 per cent in 1991 to 43.33 in 2005, with Central Punjab outpacing Northern Punjab, the traditional recruitment ground, by 7,500 to 5,000 recruits in 2005. Southern Punjab had 1,800 recruits. The NWFP and FATA increased from 20.91 per cent to 22.43 per cent, Sindh rose from 8.85 per cent to 23.02 per cent, with rural Sindh accounting for the majority of the recruits (5,095 to 2,500 in 2005), Baluchistan rose from 0.49 per cent to 1.52 per cent in 2005 with 200 urban to 300 rural recruits in 2005, and Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas rising from 5.86 per cent to 9.70 per cent."

This is from 2005, ideally they should increase recruits from southen punjab to 1/3 of punjab since they are 32% of punjab population.

"Comparing the periods 1970 and 1990-2006, we also see a change in the relative share of officers recruited from different parts of the country. The Punjab rose marginally from 66.46 per cent to 66.93, but within the Punjab there are notable changes in the home districts of the officers shifting to the more populous and emerging urban centres of Central and even Southern Punjab. This is in line with rapid urbanization trends nationwide. Dramatically, the army recruited more officers in the decade ending 2005 from Karachi than from Jhelum!

The officers who joined in that decade are now poised to rise into the general officer category. When the current group of senior Lieutenant Generals retires over the next two to three years, most of whom were commissioned in the early 1970s, the Zia Bharti will take over the running of the Pakistan Army. (Kayani was commissioned in late 1971.) In recent years, the senior cadres have been spoiled by their association with the civilian administration that has taken them away from their professional roots. The new Army Chief, General Kayani, appears to have realized the need for the army to go back to its professional roots and has begun to keep a professional distance from the former chief, Musharraf. But disengaging the army from the economy and from commercial enterprises will take time."

584 Shuja Nawaz, Pakistan's army: fighting the wars within

So there has been noticeable increase in Sindhis, Baloch and officers from Karachi!
 
.
Read the second sentence. We've a culture of joining the military, regardless of who's at the takht-e-Delhi, because our land is not good for agriculture making military our only inherent source of earning. Though times have changed now.

PS: As if MQM's guys have had no links with RAW. And sorry to burst your bubble, but we Potoharis aren't in TTP or any terrorist group for that matter. Our land hasn't been deobandized up till yet, hence terrorists from here is a rare occurrence.
You are right that Photohari people have passion for army and to fight and die for country and proof of it is most nishan haider and Victoria cross which soldiers got from this region but there was also one bad apple recently named Dr Usman(Muhammad Aqeel) which is unfortunately from matore which is well known for competent army officers and ISI Generals. matore is actaully home town of boxer Amir Khan as well. Some peopel claim that Dr usman is originally not from matore and got settled there from elsewhere
Mohammed Aqeel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Its also good thing if people from all province and ethnicities join army and bring their contribution and reprsentation which in the end will be good for Pakistan but then joining army is personal choice and it cannot be forced upon people as some community have more trend of joining army than others
 
.
walls of ethnicity have not broken because this mindset is present in elite class who has no interest in prompting a single language or agenda for nation.

I don't think you get it yet. Do you? There is no need for a single language! Let each province be unique but united when it comes to national issues. As a Lingua franca Urdu is doing just fine. We shouldn't have a national language.

We already tried 'Single province state' and also tried shoving Urdu down Begalis' throats. See where it has landed us. I think it's time to give 'unity in diversity' a chance.
 
.
Going through twitter most Baloch nationalists are in denial about the involvement of BLF/BLA claiming that they would never hurt their Pashtun brethren...as if targeting Punjabi settlers in the past was OK !
But with F.C mostly Pashtun and changing demographics (which they most fear) because of increased Pashtun presence this was as incident waiting to happen !
in 10 or 15 years pushtoon will be the majority of the province, the ratio is already nearly equal.
but baloch and pushtoon have different geographical areas, so this will still not decrese militancy in any sense but it will have implication in the provincial govt.
the key will be quetta demographics as it is the single biggest city of Baluchistan representing atleast 25% of the population and as pushtoon majority city
 
.
I don't think you get it yet. Do you? There is no need for a single language! Let each province be unique but united when it comes to national issues. As a Lingua franca Urdu is doing just fine. We shouldn't have a national language.

We already tried 'Single province state' and also tried shoving Urdu down Begalis' throats. See where it has landed us. I think it's time to give 'unity in diversity' a chance.
No one tried to shove Urdu in Bengali's throat,only issue was acceptance of Bengali as National language.
For bold part please stop consuming weed,no nation on globe is developed without any national language,Urdu is only language which a Baloch,Pastun,Sindhi,Balti,Kashmiri and a Punjabi will accept happily.
 
.
Punjab have 60% of Pakistan population.

"In 2001, the Punjabis constituted over 71 per cent of the army. The numerical strength was reduced in later years and has been brought down to just over 57 per cent this year (2007). A further three per cent decrease in recruitment from that province is on the cards by 2011."


Within a decade (2001-2011), the composition of Pakhtuns in the army would increase by one per cent to 14.5 per cent.

A two per cent increase will be made in the number of Sindhis bringing their total strength to 17 per cent by 2011.

The representation of Balochis, which was nil in 2001, constitutes 3.2 per cent at present. Their composition would be increased to 4 per cent by 2011.

Similarly, with their zero per cent presence in the army seven years ago, the people from Azad Kashmir and Northern Areas now constitute 9.11 per cent of the army. However, their number would be curtailed to 9 per cent in 2011.

Punjab’s dominance in army being reduced: ISPR - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

"Punjab shows an overall decline in recruitment of soldiers from 63.86 per cent in 1991 to 43.33 in 2005, with Central Punjab outpacing Northern Punjab, the traditional recruitment ground, by 7,500 to 5,000 recruits in 2005. Southern Punjab had 1,800 recruits. The NWFP and FATA increased from 20.91 per cent to 22.43 per cent, Sindh rose from 8.85 per cent to 23.02 per cent, with rural Sindh accounting for the majority of the recruits (5,095 to 2,500 in 2005), Baluchistan rose from 0.49 per cent to 1.52 per cent in 2005 with 200 urban to 300 rural recruits in 2005, and Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas rising from 5.86 per cent to 9.70 per cent."

This is from 2005, ideally they should increase recruits from southen punjab to 1/3 of punjab since they are 32% of punjab population.

"Comparing the periods 1970 and 1990-2006, we also see a change in the relative share of officers recruited from different parts of the country. The Punjab rose marginally from 66.46 per cent to 66.93, but within the Punjab there are notable changes in the home districts of the officers shifting to the more populous and emerging urban centres of Central and even Southern Punjab. This is in line with rapid urbanization trends nationwide. Dramatically, the army recruited more officers in the decade ending 2005 from Karachi than from Jhelum!

The officers who joined in that decade are now poised to rise into the general officer category. When the current group of senior Lieutenant Generals retires over the next two to three years, most of whom were commissioned in the early 1970s, the Zia Bharti will take over the running of the Pakistan Army. (Kayani was commissioned in late 1971.) In recent years, the senior cadres have been spoiled by their association with the civilian administration that has taken them away from their professional roots. The new Army Chief, General Kayani, appears to have realized the need for the army to go back to its professional roots and has begun to keep a professional distance from the former chief, Musharraf. But disengaging the army from the economy and from commercial enterprises will take time."

584 Shuja Nawaz, Pakistan's army: fighting the wars within

So there has been noticeable increase in Sindhis, Baloch and officers from Karachi!
This just reinforces a new quota system though, all these ethnicities are the punjabis of their own provinces and get all the benefits.
 
.
No one tried to shove Urdu in Bengali's throat,only issue was acceptance of Bengali as National language.
For bold part please stop consuming weed,no nation on globe is developed without any national language,Urdu is only language which a Baloch,Pastun,Sindhi,Balti,Kashmiri and a Punjabi will accept happily.

Stop being an ignorant git! No one said ban Urdu! I said Urdu should be Lingua franca (This is coming from a Mohajir)? First google what it means and most of the modern states don't have "National Language" they have "Official Language" But we can have more than one official language. Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Balochi can also be official language. What's wrong with that?

In fact the country which gave the world the common tongue (UK) has more than one official language apart from English in their own country. Even US doesn't have a national language. Forget all these western countries, eve our own beloved humsaaya hindustan doesn't have a 'National language'.
 
.
Stop being an ignorant git! No one said ban Urdu! I said Urdu should be Lingua franca (This is coming from a Mohajir)? First google what it means and most of the modern states don't have "National Language" they have "Official Language" But we can have more than one official language. Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Balochi can also be official language. What's wrong with that?

In fact the country which gave the world the common tongue (UK) has more than one official language apart from English in their own country. Even US doesn't have a national language. Forget all these western countries, eve our own beloved humsaaya hindustan doesn't have a 'National language'.
You are not worth discussion go live with your "Lingua franca".
 
.
Stop being an ignorant git! No one said ban Urdu! I said Urdu should be Lingua franca (This is coming from a Mohajir)? First google what it means and most of the modern states don't have "National Language" they have "Official Language" But we can have more than one official language. Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto and Balochi can also be official language. What's wrong with that?

In fact the country which gave the world the common tongue (UK) has more than one official language apart from English in their own country. Even US doesn't have a national language. Forget all these western countries, eve our own beloved humsaaya hindustan doesn't have a 'National language'.

Ranking order.

1 - National Language | Unified Language.

2 - Official Regional Languages.
> Punjabi
> Sindhi
> Balochi
> Pashto
 
.
So what's wrong? I have Frnds whose ancestors migrated to Pakistan in the 1800s or early 1900s... Infact a sizeable Pashtun population if Baluchistan has afghan origin... But they are Pakistani..

But the refugees who came here during or after soviet invasion arent!
Even the Pak Pashtuns in Pekhawar or Nokhar have no long lost love for afghani muhajirs.



I doubt the tribes are going to war over this terrible incident.. Yes Baluch and Pashtuns have had issues n even conflicts between tribes... But an average Baloch or Pashtun has no hatred for eachother.. And to be honest I'd be glad if Pashtuns pick up their weapons n align with Baluch lashkars n go after these sons of bitchez!
Did i read the news wrong or wht?
What is wrong in what bizenjo said. Isnt he talking abt afghan refugees? This is a real problem pakistan has. Kya bakwas hai even ajk has alot of afghan refugee population.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom