What's new

Axis of Evil together with Russia could be a force to be reckoned with against US sanctions

And you have no right to intervene in my life of how i wish to live.

i don't seek to interfere... i only guide you to a more contributing life.

If you try that i will remove you. Its as easy as that.

truly?? are you in some transnational political movement?? are you in western bloc or israeli intel??
 
Just let us show the leaders of this "coalition"...xD

161325922.jpg


erinnerungsplattform-lukaschenko.jpg


060731_raul_vmed_7p.grid-4x2.jpg


1410174270640_wps_39_This_handout_photo_provid.jpg


article-2107926-11E89542000005DC-152_634x513.jpg


and at last the best of the all!

644.jpg

This has to be the funniest shit you have ever posted. :rofl:
 
Really? you might want to do some research before claiming things that are not true. But then again you are know to lie and pass your opinions as facts.


Russia bets its energy future on waste-free fast breeder nuclear ...


Russia develops hybrid fusion-fission reactor, offers China role ...






As for the rest of my rubbish what? Have no response? Please tell everyone how Russia which is a world power in aviation can not built an aircraft. Or trains for that matter. Tell everyone the last time a country in Europe build an aircraft on their own that does not date back to ww2 or that is not French?


a fast breeder is not nucler fusion but a normal fission reactor.

Since you have no clue what fusion is, this entire topic is senseless

Aeroflot, the russian state airline uses almost completly Airbus. Russia had to buy its highspeed trains from Siemens (Germany)

Airbus is not french. Just because your education is so patheticl low, does not make your bullshit better.
 
a fast breeder is not nucler fusion but a normal fission reactor.


You have no clue as to what you are talking about and as a result you getting tangled in your own arguments. First you mentioned that Russia has no experience in nuclear Fusion, then when i corrected you, you then made up the claim that Russia has never had a fusion reactor and that i do not know the difference between fusion and fission. I provided several examples as well as sources that completely disproved your claim. One source mentioned that Russia has both a fusion and fission hybrid reactor.



Nuclear fusion was pioneered in the Soviet Union. Educate yourself:



Tokamak - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Although nuclear fusion research began soon after World War II, the programs in various countries were each initially classified as secret. It was not until after the 1955 United Nations International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy in Geneva that programs were declassified and international scientific collaboration could take place.

Experimental research of tokamak systems started in 1956 in Kurchatov Institute, Moscow by a group of Soviet scientists led by Lev Artsimovich. The group constructed the first tokamaks, the most successful being T-3 and its larger version T-4. T-4 was tested in 1968 in Novosibirsk, conducting the first ever quasistationary thermonuclear fusion reaction.[3]

In 1968, at the third IAEA International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research at Novosibirsk, Soviet scientists announced that they had achieved electron temperatures of over 1000 eV in a tokamak device. British and American scientists met this news with skepticism, since they were far from reaching that benchmark; they remained suspicious until laser scattering tests confirmed the findings the next year.




A tokamak (tокамак) is a device using a magnetic field to confine a plasma in the shape of a torus. Achieving a stable plasma equilibriumrequires magnetic field lines that move around the torus in a helical shape. Such a helical field can be generated by adding a toroidal field (traveling around the torus in circles) and a poloidal field (traveling in circles orthogonal to the toroidal field). In a tokamak, the toroidal field is produced by electromagnets that surround the torus, and the poloidal field is the result of a toroidal electric current that flows inside the plasma. This current is induced inside the plasma with a second set of electromagnets.

The tokamak is one of several types of magnetic confinement devices, and is one of the most-researched candidates for producing controlled thermonuclear fusion power. Magnetic fields are used for confinement since no solid material could withstand the extremely high temperature of the plasma. An alternative to the tokamak is the stellarator.


Tokamaks were invented in the 1950s by Soviet physicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov, inspired by an original idea of Oleg Lavrentiev




Aeroflot, the russian state airline uses almost completly Airbus.


Aeroflot ordered 30 sukhoi 100's and 50 MC-21's. In all the sukhoi 100 has over 300 orders including some from western europe and the MC-21 has 276 orders.

Study supply and demand, both the sukhoi 100 and the MC-21 are new aircraft with the MC-21 still under development. Obviously companies like Aeroflot will order new Airbuses instead of old Soviet jetliners. Now there is a supply of new aircraft and many Russian companies as well as foreign companies are choosing the sukhoi 100 and MC-21 over western designs.

Probably one of the reasons why European economies are in recession is because Russia is now producing a lot of products that it used to import and with the rapid Chinese rise and industrial growth Russia is now importing more from China. Europe is becoming less competitive and with its foolish sanctions a lot of Russian companies will look else where, and i'm certain that many other countries will do the same.



Russia had to buy its highspeed trains from Siemens (Germany)



Firstly you only mentioned "trains" not high speed trains but a little research would have easily told you that Russia has been building high speed trains before they were even popular in most countries, example of one of these is the ER200. So your notion is completely false just like you were wrong on every other subject.

You also do not know the difference between not being able to produce something and not having a supply. As in supply and demand. If Russia has no new high speed trains then companies will go to other suppliers.

Also, the 'Russia one' tram although not a high speed train it is a lot nicer then most trams i have seen in europe or anywhere for that matter.



Airbus is not french. Just because your education is so patheticl low, does not make your bullshit better.



Actually France is a part of Airbus :lol: but i never even mentioned Airbus or civil airliners so i don't know where you are going with this incoherent rant. I asked the question as to when the last time any european country independently build an aircraft on their own? France has the Rafale and other then that no one else has anything that they have built on their own that does not date back to the 1950s. Without Rolls Royce there would be no Eurofighter or Tornado so i would not brag about aviation.
 
Last edited:
You have no clue as to what you are talking about and as a result you getting tangled in your own arguments. First you mentioned that Russia has no experience in nuclear Fusion, then when i corrected you, you then made up the claim that Russia has never had a fusion reactor and that i do not know the difference between fusion and fission. I provided several examples as well as sources that completely disproved your claim. One source mentioned that Russia has both a fusion and fission hybrid reactor.



Nuclear fusion was pioneered in the Soviet Union. Educate yourself:



Tokamak - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia











Aeroflot ordered 30 sukhoi 100's and 50 MC-21's. In all the sukhoi 100 has over 300 orders including some from western europe and the MC-21 has 276 orders.

Study supply and demand, both the sukhoi 100 and the MC-21 are new aircraft with the MC-21 still under development. Obviously companies like Aeroflot will order new Airbuses instead of old Soviet jetliners. Now there is a supply of new aircraft and many Russian companies as well as foreign companies are choosing the sukhoi 100 and MC-21 over western designs.

Probably one of the reasons why European economies are in recession is because Russia is now producing a lot of products that it used to import and with the rapid Chinese rise and industrial growth Russia is now importing more from China. Europe is becoming less competitive and with its foolish sanctions a lot of Russian companies will look else where, and i'm certain that many other countries will do the same.







Firstly you only mentioned "trains" not high speed trains but a little research would have easily told you that Russia has been building high speed trains before they were even popular in most countries, example of one of these is the ER200. So your notion is completely false just like you were wrong on every other subject.

You also do not know the difference between not being able to produce something and not having a supply. As in supply and demand. If Russia has no new high speed trains then companies will go to other suppliers.

Also, the 'Russia one' tram although not a high speed train it is a lot nicer then most trams i have seen in europe or anywhere for that matter.







Actually France is a part of Airbus :lol: but i never even mentioned Airbus or civil airliners so i don't know where you are going with this incoherent rant. I asked the question as to when the last time any european country independently build an aircraft on their own? France has the Rafale and other then that no one else has anything that they have built on their own that does not date back to the 1950s. Without Rolls Royce there would be no Eurofighter or Tornado so i would not brag about aviation.


countries don´t develop airplanes. We are a capitalist nation. Corporations develop airplanes. I don´t want my nation to develop anything from my tax money. 3rd world shit hole countries develop shitty planes that nobody buys.

As for the rest of your nonsense...russia has a functional fusion reactor? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
 
countries don´t develop airplanes. We are a capitalist nation. Corporations develop airplanes. I don´t want my nation to develop anything from my tax money. 3rd world shit hole countries develop shitty planes that nobody buys.


Spare everyone your incoherent rank and do not try to dance your way out of the argument. You made a number of wrong claims then when i provided you with evidence, sources, and examples you started going into full denial mode.


As for the rest of your nonsense...russia has a functional fusion reactor? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH



Read, my source. Russia was one of the pioneers of fusion reactors. I can't believe how many times you have made a dunce out of yourself. :lol:
 
Spare everyone your incoherent rank and do not try to dance your way out of the argument. You made a number of wrong claims then when i provided you with evidence, sources, and examples you started going into full denial mode.






Read, my source. Russia was one of the pioneers of fusion reactors. I can't believe how many times you have made a dunce out of yourself. :lol:

russia never operated a functional fusion reactor. If it did, it would generate all its energy with 20 kg hydrogen per year and use spaceships to travel mars in 4 days.

as for th rst of your bullshit: :D
 
russia never operated a functional fusion reactor. If it did, it would generate all its energy with 20 kg hydrogen per year and use spaceships to travel mars in 4 days.

what would be your method of space propulsion... (a). nuclear pulse propulsion, (b). nuclear-heated working liquid propulsion, (c). plasma ( vasimr etc ), (d). solar-heated working liquid propulsion, (e). combination, (f). something else...

if nuclear-based propulsion, why fusion or why fission...
if nuclear-based power generation, why fusion or why fission...
 

One of the most crappy movies I saw in my life. :o::o:

You look like a Hindu thinking you are aryan and curse in Arabic at Arabs
:lol:

What do you mean by that, do you know the word Aryan was stolen from Hindu scriptures and now every fairness obsessed dumb tom, dick and harry think he is more Aryan than Indians whom ancient Indian considered as non-Aryan barbarians. :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
One of the most crappy movies I saw in my life. :o::o:



What do you mean by that, do you know the word Aryan was stolen from Hindu scriptures and now every fairness obsessed dumb tom, dick and harry think he is more Aryan than Indians whom ancient Indian considered as non-Aryan barbarians. :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Well most Europeans don't see Indians as their equals but even Iranians have this racism towards colored skin while they are not white either.
 
Well most Europeans don't see Indians as their equals but even Iranians have this racism towards colored skin while they are not white either.

Who cares what they think, I was talking about the word Aryan, the two original sources of the word Aryan being Rigveda and Avesta and those dimwits in Europe stole in it 19th century from Rigveda to hide the inferiority complex of having a barbaric ancient history and now those dimwits thinks they have more claim on the word 'Aryan' than the original inheritors Indians and Iranians themselves have. :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
 
russia never operated a functional fusion reactor. If it did, it would generate all its energy with 20 kg hydrogen per year and use spaceships to travel mars in 4 days.

as for th rst of your bullshit: :D


Obviously you do not no how to read because i provided sources that debunk your petty accusation. Also if Europe had fusion reactors it could travel to jupiter in 3 seconds and unicorn paradise in about 2 days, it could probably also end world hunger in about 5 days.
 
Who cares what they think, I was talking about the word Aryan, the two original sources of the word Aryan being Rigveda and Avesta and those dimwits in Europe stole in it 19th century from Rigveda to hide the inferiority complex of having a barbaric ancient history and now those dimwits thinks they have more claim on the word 'Aryan' than the original inheritors Indians and Iranians themselves have. :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
But do Persians see Indians as equals?
 
But do Persians see Indians as equals?

We are different people we don't see each other as same but both of them called themselves as Aryans mentioned in their holy books Avesta and Vedas. In Hinduism, Aryan don't mean white race but Aryan was an adjective and title means noble and was used for people who follows some customs of being noble. Ancient Germanic tribes were barbarians looting and pillaging South Europe, there was nothing Noble(Aryan) about them.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom