Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
Again, Aussies are a primary economy. They are exporting raw materials and value addition within the economy is not competitive so value added goods are imported. This anyway is leading to a services led economy being developed and that is not the safest thing to bank up on. The focus in Australia is to develop technology so that a competency can be derived in the otherwise - rapidly turning - generic market. So there are things to read between the lines there too.
Yes, Australian manufacturing is under pressure and we are moving towards a more service-oriented economy. Which makes the claim for Indian markets all the more incongruous. India wants Australian minerals, not services. It is itself a service-exporter; it does not imports services. And there is already no shortage of buyers for Australian raw material, including India -- even before the uranium sales.
Of course the world will always try to ensure that there is no polarization of wealth. If India was ahead, there would be attempts to ensure that the wealth is shared with the nations that India is doing business with. But that does not in any way means that the "containment" of the type that you are talking about would have been executed. It is conjecture and nothing factual points in that direction.
If you don't accept that America is engaged in China containment, then we can let the matter drop. There have been any number of policy papers, not to mention explicit statements, to that effect from American administration officials.
LoL, can you name just one. I mean just one leg of the relationship where it is prudent for Pakistan to accept China's brotherly love which could yield higher ROI than any other viable alternative available in the long term?
I mean non-Indian centric
China is helping Pakistan with civilian nuclear technology which is denied by the West.