karan.1970
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,781
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
Of course you don't see the duplicity because the beneficiary on the other hand is India. So i don't expect you to see. India like Pakistan is not a signatory of anything which makes it no better then Pakistan for any waiver yet there India is with one. So by all standards its duplicity on the part of these nations not India because India is doing whats in its interests and getting the best out of it. Hope you get my point.
India does not have AQ Khan.. Neither does it have international terror groups operating at will in its boundaries.. These 2 factors contribute to 90% of the reason why Pakistan is denied the waiver. No duplicity there. At the end of the day, treaties etc are also made to ensure a certain behavior from the signatory nations. In case of India, the other members of NSG are sure that India will exhibit that behavior even without the implementation of treaty. In case of Pakistan they are not.. Pretty simple actually... And I can understand that being on the receiving end, it would seem unfair to you.. However, you should not link it up with the waiver for India but try and get that waiver on Pakistan's own merits. That way it wont look like a case of entitlement mentality..
India and Pakistan have been dehyphenated long back in the eyes of the west.