Firstly the heading of the thread is completely misleading and to those thinking that it shows a failure on part of IA you are over reacting..
I was watching this story since noon and was lucky to watch interviews of brigadier Singh and then IA chief General Malik, so I would try to explain the story in short and what the case really is,
Brigadier Singh was handling operation in Batalik sector during kargil war and had differences of opinion over the number(600 versus 45) and type of insurgents(mujahiden or regular PA) in the area and the number IA jawans required to tackle them.
eventually bri. Singh's voice was heard and was given the required jawans and command to handle the task which he completed with exemplary skills by winning batalik sector (also the first sector to be completed cleared in kargil war) and during the process was injured himself while leading from the front.
Lt.general Pal took it personally and diluted this exemplary courage by not giving due credit to brigadier Singh in War Records which eventually resulted him not receiving a war medal and subsequent promotion. So mr. Singh went to the court and won the case.
then army chief malik accepts the discrepancies and courts verdict clearly vindicating brigadier Singh's stand and rejecting lt.genral Pal.
The only part where its shameful for the Indian army is that personal differences between officers at higher ranks had taken place after the war(even though there were differences during the war common sense prevailed at that time and no fighting capabilities of IA got affected i.e PA didnt get any benefit due to infighting) and resulted in injustice to one of the bravest officers. The good thing is that brigadier Singh has been rightly vindicated albeit after nearly 11 years.
Now where did the IA lose the war??