What's new

Army scuttles Arjun trials to push through T-90 purchase

aww.. still butt hurt over snubbing of F-16 ?? Don't worry.. u guys can get F35 going by 2160 :lol:

It's more like you were begging for the F-35 and we said no. You asked for transfer of tech of F-16 and we said no. You got denied with advance technologies because you can't handle them.
 
The army guys driving the tanks whose lives depend on them choose T90 over Arjun. What does that say about Arjun? Arjun is an inferior tank. It might look good for parades but falls apart in real combat. This proves again Arjun is a failed project. Time to move on. Don't drag it out like the failed LCA for another 20 years.
don't comment on anything you don't know :angry: infact,it is just the opposite..there has been a program on the national television where the army jawans actually driving the tank said this is mindblowing and "the best i've ever driven".The jawans,who will actually fight a war are very much satisfied with the tank,but not the generals.It is just like a student having no qualms about his pen by which he is going to give the x'am,but his parents are not happy with it :woot:
 
don't comment on anything you don't know :angry: infact,it is just the opposite..there has been a program on the national television where the army jawans actually driving the tank said this is mindblowing and "the best i've ever driven".The jawans,who will actually fight a war are very much satisfied with the tank,but not the generals.It is just like a student having no qualms about his pen by which he is going to give the x'am,but his parents are not happy with it :woot:

There's a reason a soldier remains a soldier and a general becomes a general. Are you going to believe the words of a pissant soldier or a general who's responsible for his men's lives?
 
There's a reason a soldier remains a soldier and a general becomes a general. Are you going to believe the words of a pissant soldier or a general who's responsible for his men's lives?
we should believe in the generals..but the fact is that there are different generals in our country who are charged with coruption..so it becomes easier for us to believe in a pissant soldier,than a 5 star general.though arjun outperformed T-90 in the deserts of rajasthan,these generals still choose t-90,but they were unable to give any satisfactory explanation
 
we should believe in the generals..but the fact is that there are different generals in our country who are charged with coruption..so it becomes easier for us to believe in a pissant soldier,than a 5 star general.though arjun outperformed T-90 in the deserts of rajasthan,these generals still choose t-90,but they were unable to give any satisfactory explanation

Said who? The DRDO and its bought "experts" made the 'Ferrari' statement to save the failed Arjun project. The pissant soldiers were just as corrupted, just not exposed yet.
 
It seems like India spends Billions of dollars on producing Indigenous weapons systems and then discards them to buy foreign weapons. What a waste of resources. Wouldn't it be smarter to purchase foreign weapons complete with ToT and save all that money.


Development cost of Arjun was Rs 380 CRORES or about 75 Million USD
 
That's why even the indian army refuses the use Arjun :lol:

So they ordered 242 of them to use as showpieces?

T-90MS will be an added threat. Im sure even T-72M1 with ERA can match off against Type-99.
 
Why all this sudden hue and cry?it was decided longo that army will go for 248 tanks,and a follow on later.It was already decided IA won't buy more.
Chinese and pak members may malign the tank as much as they wish but fact remains quality wise it is a very good tank comparable with most western designs.

LCA i must agree is a failed project as of now,its just too late.
 
I agree there may be issues that need addressing but I would argue there is too much readiness to accept corruption over genuine concerns. The IA leadership is nowhere near as bad as you are trying to make out. There are valid reaosns why the T-90MS is a better option for certain eviroments over the Arjun but the writer has simply overlooked this. There is really no proof these trails were "scuttled" because of vested interests or whatever. Time and time again we hear these sensationalist news stories based on minor and tedious peices of info that are blown up and later we hear (with much less fanfare) the REAL reasons behind such events and the reasons are perfectly valid and understandable.


The media is all too quick to jump the gun in these cases, it happens again and again and it unfairly tarnishes certain people and institutions.




I called out the corruption issues in Army specifically before the media made an issue out of it. This tank was available with the Russian armed forces before we placed this order. General Kapoor pushed his deal thru right before leaving office. Come on, the writing is on the wall. YOu don;t push a deal thru a few days before leaving office. As for making it look bad, IA does a great job at that by themselves.

don't comment on anything you don't know :angry: infact,it is just the opposite..there has been a program on the national television where the army jawans actually driving the tank said this is mindblowing and "the best i've ever driven".The jawans,who will actually fight a war are very much satisfied with the tank,but not the generals.It is just like a student having no qualms about his pen by which he is going to give the x'am,but his parents are not happy with it :woot:




Exactly! We got a few questionable posters on this site who are specifically trying to malign the Arjun and they are not CHinese or ****.

There's a reason a soldier remains a soldier and a general becomes a general. Are you going to believe the words of a pissant soldier or a general who's responsible for his men's lives?




That logic is hollow to the core. I guess you haven;t been to India where a person with no qualifications can reach Minister with a criminal background.
 
Now now son remember f35 "AFFORDABLE, SUSTAINABLE, INNOVATION,...." explain 220mn per piece

Calling me 'son' won't make your backward country any better.

220 million a piece is still pretty "affordable" for us :azn:

F-35 is a fifth generation , single-engine aircraft. It is a new technology that is being built for export for the first time! Delays are expected.
 
Not true. United States doesn't build any fighter jet in the class of LCA. All of our planes are way superior than this failed junkard.

How dare u to call it a junk ........ who's this bloody crap:angry: ? may be u r an aeronautics specialist if yes then may be one of the most worst one , the IAF which may be the one of the most professional one in the whole world is going to order some 200 of it and u r calling it is a junkard , if it is a junk then urs f-22 is the greatest junkard in the universe .....after spending a hell of 60bn and having a rcs of some o.ooooooooooo1(dont know how many 0s) m2 is gong to the junkard merely after i5 yrs of service wht a joke.

do u know how much tech has to be matured , wht goal hav to be achieved , how far our infant aeronautic industry have come through, ohhhh..... come on just tell me hav u ever visited the HAL banglore facility to witnessed the dev procedure....if not then which grnd u call it is a junkard:angry:.
look we r not a 250 yrs democracy like urs , we haven't fought 2 wrld war and a lng cold war .....we r now going thru a cld war, we gradually armed ourselves with a lot of thing tht u cant be able to call a junkard ok , we know tht we have a no of lacuna but how could u describe a sweating effort of hardworking ppl as like a crap

if lca is a junkard then go and tell ur OBAMA tht dont fall in line and lag behind the russian and french when we are opening a tender.
May be u r the most debt ridden country in the world 16 trillion (wht the hell) , then come after 40 yrs frm today i would be there to see how would u effort a 220 mn platfrom just for the airshows .

members may be u banned me for this post but i wont tolerate this kind of f$#%^&ng comments .
 
How dare u to call it a junk ........ who's this bloody crap:angry: ? may be u r an aeronautics specialist if yes then may be one of the most worst one , the IAF which may be the one of the most professional one in the whole world is going to order some 200 of it and u r calling it is a junkard , if it is a junk then urs f-22 is the greatest junkard in the universe .....after spending a hell of 60bn and having a rcs of some o.ooooooooooo1(dont know how many 0s) m2 is gong to the junkard merely after i5 yrs of service wht a joke.

do u know how much tech has to be matured , wht goal hav to be achieved , how far our infant aeronautic industry have come through, ohhhh..... come on just tell me hav u ever visited the HAL banglore facility to witnessed the dev procedure....if not then which grnd u call it is a junkard:angry:.
look we r not a 250 yrs democracy like urs , we haven't fought 2 wrld war and a lng cold war .....we r now going thru a cld war, we gradually armed ourselves with a lot of thing tht u cant be able to call a junkard ok , we know tht we have a no of lacuna but how could u describe a sweating effort of hardworking ppl as like a crap

if lca is a junkard then go and tell ur OBAMA tht dont fall in line and lag behind the russian and french when we are opening a tender.
May be u r the most debt ridden country in the world 16 trillion (wht the hell) , then come after 40 yrs frm today i would be there to see how would u effort a 220 mn platfrom just for the airshows .

members may be u banned me for this post but i wont tolerate this kind of f$#%^&ng comments .

Uh, calm down.:pop:
 

This may be a little cheesy at times and will cause sensitive reactions.. but look at the arguments presented before going duke nukem on the video.
moreover, before you all jump on any "anti-India" guns as some juveniles will.. have a look at the channel of the poster..
he as taken pretty much everybody down.
BlacktailDefense's channel - YouTube
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom