then you do not have the updated knowledge about arjun
1.outdated designs: the design is absolute of a 21st century mbt... i think you have seen the pictures of an earlier prototype and not the the series produced
2.weakness in armour: hahah..the drdo developed kanchan armour has been able to withstand the fire of t-72 from point blank range without era.Even indian army has acknowledged the the armour of arjun is better than t-90
3.gun with low accracy: check out the other threads on arjun,army now wants drdo developed rifled gun than the russian made gun as russia is not giving us its gun technology and drdo's gun is better
4.low mark in obstacle crossing yes,but that problem has been fixed 5yrs ago,now not even the so called generals are not complaining about it
5.underpowered engine which was replaced years ago
6.short range mobility no problem with arjun's mobility,no one said it was "too heavy to move"
7.overweight: this is the sole issue why the IA is complaining,but never said it was immobile... then whats got to do with "weight"??? one would definitely think about the intentions then
an lastly,arjun was "tailor made" for the indian dessert,so a pissant soldier has been able to drive it on a "FLAT" desert ground.on the other hand t-90 suffered sunstrokes in the same desert ground...engine malfunctioned,computerised system failed..so how its better???
Stop replying to Chini troll...