Are you in favor of 35 province in Pakistan??

[dexter]

No mate, If we allow this, then people will also demand separate province for sunni, shia, deobands, and one for other minorities , Etc...

Are you out of mind?
Race and sect are separate things
how can you compare these two things together?
Any logic behind that?

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

Not its not. KPK need new province because Hindko is indeed different language compared to pashto.

Under Sindh and Rajasthan? Yet they speak punjabi and not sindhi and Rajasthani. Many pashtun areas were under Ranjeet Sindh, lets make them part of Punjab?

Sarki is more near to Sindhi of Mehran region... I have saraki friends they also accept this.... Saraki in culture and language are near to Sindh... Punjab, hazara of KPK ( I myself hazarawal) Kashmir are more near in culture and language......

 

[dexter]

We Sindhi's are against the division of Sindh.

And we are in favour but on administrative basis
like North sindh and south sindh

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

Sairki is a language born out of Punjabi and it doesnot mean to be Punjabi u cannot speak Sairiki or if u know a language sairiki, you r not Punjabi.


For centuires Punjabis are defined by five punj of rivers, and Sairiki South Punjab is part of being Punjabi.

Besides there is not much difference in Central Punjab and South Punjab, just because of a slight change in language does not at all mean u r no more Punjabi.

Second point, the recent election is completely valid and accepted except 4 seats which PTI wants recounting.

South Punjab voted for unity of one Punjab.

Your comment has no logic go learn some history first....

 

[Devil Soul]

More province on administrative basis rather than ethnic/baradari bases

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

I am dividing province on Administrative basis not on language ... don't make it Punjabi Pushtoon thread...

 

[dil_dil]

Sarki is more near to Sindhi of Mehran region... I have saraki friends they also accept this.... Saraki in culture and language are near to Sindh... Punjab, hazara of KPK ( I myself hazarawal) Kashmir are more near in culture and language......

First of all you are confused soul, are you Hazarawal who believe himself to be pathan? You realize real pashtuns call you punjabi? Which for them is supposed to be derogatory term.

If by Kashmir you mean Azad Kashmir which is pahari area then i agree, if you mean Dardic Kashmiris then i don't agree at all.

Lets see how much you know about Seraiki language, how many dialects are there in Seraiki language?

 

[Musafir117]

Yes
35 is bad figure lol, well according to each province population we need dozens for sure, and one thing change the current provinces names simply we are pakistani not punjabi Sindhi pashtoon Balochi.

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

Are you out of mind?
Race and sect are separate things
how can you compare these two things together?
Any logic behind that?

You took it wrong, Read my post again. I was replying his rant..

 

[Asian.Century]

I am dividing province on Administrative basis not on language ... don't make it Punjabi Pushtoon thread...

lol, you are one who said South Punjab speak Sairki, and hence it needs a separate province.

 

[Gunsnroses]

We most certainly need more provinces divided tactically to eradicate ethnic influences and linguistic based racist politics if we whole heartedly want to secure the future of Pakistan.

 

[Musafir117]

On siasat.pk this poll result (24 voters)

1) Yes 91.67%
2) No. 8.33%

It's need of time coz public knows it's for their interest but corrupt and harm khor politicians don't Wana do this, they know if it's done they lost a lot of things.

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

First of all you are confused soul, are you Hazarawal who believe himself to be pathan? You realize real pashtuns call you punjabi? Which for them is supposed to be derogatory term.

If by Kashmir you mean Azad Kashmir which is pahari area then i agree, if you mean Dardic Kashmiris then i don't agree at all.

Lets see how much you know about Seraiki language, how many dialects are there in Seraiki language?

Yes I know what's I'm saying Hazara was part of greater Kashmir with in 1803 Dogra king sold it to Britishers ... Hazarat become Prince's state with State of Amb..... I am Tanoli who by origin are Pushtoon of Afghanistan but now have no link with Pushtoon same like Niazi clan .... Hazarat was first part of punjab later it was merged in KPK....

 

[dil_dil]

Yes I know what's I'm saying Hazara was part of greater Kashmir with in 1803 Dogra king sold it to Britishers ... Hazarat become Prince's state with State of Amb..... I am Tanoli who by origin are Pushtoon of Afghanistan but now have no link with Pushtoon same like Niazi clan .... Hazarat was first part of punjab later it was merged in KPK....

But Niazis of Punjab are asli pashtuns despite speaking punjabi but not you guys. You guys are just confused souls @ghoul

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

But Niazis of Punjab are asli pashtuns despite speaking punjabi but not you guys. You guys are just confused souls @ghoul

Go write Tanoli on Google....

But Niazis of Punjab are asli pashtuns despite speaking punjabi but not you guys. You guys are just confused souls @ghoul

of Amb.
The Tanoli/Tanokhel(Hindko/Urdu: تنولی‎; Pashto: تنولي‎) is an Afghan Pashtun Tribe[1][2][3] of Batani confideration mostly inhabiting the Tanawal valley of the North-West Frontier of present day Pakistan, named after the Tanoli tribe when took over the valley from Turks in the 14th century. One of the oldest and the most authentic books on Afghans, Mekhzen-e-Afghani of Neamat Ullah written during the period 1609-1611 asserts that: Ghilzai, son of Mato, was blessed with three sons: Ibrahim(Lodhi), Toor(Toran) and Poor(Buran). Ibrahim had two sons; Haijub and Sahbak. Tano was one of the Thirteen sons of Haijub.[4] Though, today the Tanawal area is part of the Hazara division of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan, in the past the larger portion of it comprised the two semi-independent native states or principalities of Amb and Phulra, ruled over by Tanoli chiefs of the same family, c 1840s to 1972. Prior to that, the area or 'Ilaqa' of Tanawal had remained an independent territory for long, from the 14th century to the 19th.[5] Across the Durand line, there are also Tanolis living in Ghazni and Paktia provinces of Afghanistan. The Tanoli, allied with other Pashtuns of the region, participated in the frontier wars c. 1840s against the British. In Charles Allen's analysis of these wars, the Tanolis were described as "extremely hostile,brave and hardy, and accounted for the best swordsmen in Hazara".[