Arabs invasion of India - Long Story Short

[Bornubus]

WE had lots of tiny tribes Kingdom in sindh provinces itself and check thisthe Indians were far superior to the other nations inhabiting the area at that time. Especially the Greek soldiers were told of a formidable power on the Ganga. Obviously it was the kingdom of Magadha ruled by the Nandas who maintained an army far outnumbering that of Alexander. So, despite the repeated appeals of Alexander to advance, the Greek soldiers did not budge an inch

HE JUST SAW THE TRAILER !!! Most powerful kingdoms than Nadas wr there in other parts of India ....
MIGHTY NATION


Yea and Shias and Sunni where fighting crown . Later Shia leader escaped to Iraq ? But later again recaptured and killed by Sunnis . Am I right ?

That is very unfortunate part of our History that after the Centralized reign of Gupta,the subcontinent devided into small feudal principalities who fought between each other ,a good opportunity for invaders

Even Prithviraj was just a Feudal lord

 

[Indian Patriot]

Even Prithviraj was just a Feudal lord

He was no feudal lord. But if I start revealing the true history many Indians would go mad with anger, particularly the Rajputs. So let us believe what we think is history.

 

[Screambowl]

clash of civilization
just like Mongols invaded Arabs.

 

[Bornubus]

He was no feudal lord. But if I start revealing the true history many Indians would go mad with anger, particularly the Rajputs. So let us believe what we think is history.

If i quote noted indian historian He wasn't even even killed in the battle of Tarain

 

[Levina]

Arabs never got beyond Sindh. Arabs are notorious losers who rarely won wars. It was the non-Arab muslims who kept Islam flag flying.

Muhammed Ghaznavi was a Turk not Arab. The Seljuks were a central Asian nomadic tribe that was Islamised and later became Ghazis. The Mameluks were the "slave" turks. Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).

Lets not forget that Battle of Rajasthan, when Nagabhata of North and Vikramaditya II of south came together to repel the Arabs and puch 'em back. The Muslim conquest of Persia by Arab forces in a short space of time gave Arabs the (over)confidence to invade India.... which needless to say ended in failure.
The issue with muslim conquerors was that they created new legal and administrative systems that challenged the existing systems of social conduct and ethics. They also introduced new cultural mores that in some ways were very different from the existing cultural codes. This was always a cause of friction.

It took place during the battle for succession which happened after the death of the prophet.

@levina Ji, aap kaise ho?

Am good, thanks for asking. How about you?

 

[Ind4Ever]

Islamic invaders could never set foot in the eastern mountains of India. Ladakh, Darjiling, North-Eastern states of India were always free of Islamic rule.



Not sure about all the details, I guess its the Battle of Karbala which is the root.

Ya the Shia leader were killed who was in exile . Sunnis searched and assassinated him . From that time both are fighting . Even though after few centuries they lived together for many centuries when Whahabis changed the story once again . They started killing Shia till they belive in Sunnism .

But I really wonder is there will be any solution at all . The persons involved in this problem died

 

[Indian Patriot]

If i quote noted indian historian He wasn't even even killed in the battle of Tarain

Chauhan was not killed in Tarain, some reports even claim he was never killed at all. He and his family were enslaved and kept as prisoners and some of his family relations converted and were given small jagirs and they later faded into oblivion.

The tall fable of Chauhan killing Ghori is just that, a myth.

 

[p4kistan]

Arabs invasion of India

they got attracted by the riches of India.

Western India the necessary resources to conquer India.

• The Arabs learnt the figures from one to nine (Indian numerals), which Europeans learnt later from the Arabs as

Invasions of Mohmud Ghazni
Mohmud of Ghazni invaded India 17 times. His motive was to plunder the riches of Indian temples. In 1026, he plundered the famous Somnath temple in Gujarat.

Invasions of Mohammad Ghori
Muizzuddin Mohammad-bin-Sam (Mohammed of Ghori) invaded India out of territorial ambitions.

Arabs invasion of India

INDIA, INDIAN, WESTERN INDIA

SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE THERE WAS NO INDIA THEN

HIND YES INDIA NO.

 

[Indian Patriot]

Am good, thanks for asking. How about you?

Am also good Levina Ji.....

 

[Bornubus]

Chauhan was not killed in Tarain, some reports even claim he was never killed at all. He and his family were enslaved and kept as prisoners and some of his family relations converted and were given small jagirs and they later faded into oblivion.

The tall fable of Chauhan killing Ghori is just that, a myth.

He was given a jagir in Rajasthan and ruled under Muizudin soverighnity

 

[Ind4Ever]

INDIA, INDIAN, WESTERN INDIA

SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE THERE WAS NO INDIA THEN

HIND YES INDIA NO.

Brilliant !!!

 

[p4kistan]

Brilliant !!!

THANKS

 

[Jaggu]

Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).

Babur is said to be descended from Chingiz Khan from his mother's side of family while from his fathers side he was descended from Timur lane. It would not be out of the question for him being an actual descendant of Chingiz Khan, it is estimated that 1 in 200 people in the world are his direct descendants.

 

[Indian Patriot]

Babur is said to be descended from Chingiz Khan from his mother's side of family while from his fathers side he was descended from Timur lane. It would not be out of the question for him being an actual descendant of Chingiz Khan, it is estimated that 1 in 200 people in the world are his direct descendants.

It could be or may not be true. Those days all rulers claimed lineage of Genghiz. Be it Taimur or Babur. It is like modern day Indian, Paksitani, bangladeshi muslims claiming to be mughal or from the mughal royal family. It is like a prestige issue.

 

[Ind4Ever]

THANKS

Welcome !