Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Buddy Muhammad Bin Qasim invaded under Ummayad Caliphate, the invasion was cuz of strategic and trade reasons, plus the local population had turned against Sindhi ruler Raja Dahir, the notorious king who married his own sisters, they found it a brilliant opportunity, Ummayad empire was huge on one end it had sindh and multan, on the other it had Lisbon in Portugal, as far as the plunder is concerned this has always happened throughout human history, in europe, in africa or in asia, the victorious always did plunder the wealth of defeated army, Nadir Shah u r referring to also defeated and killed Ottoman Caliphate's Grand Vazir Osman Topal Pasha and then plundered Dehli, however the invasions under Rashidun Caliphate were different, that is the first 4 caliphs and companions of Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W), when Sassanids were defeated and Pakistan's baluchistan was captured, even the people of Sassanid empire and Byzantine empire rejoiced when under Caliph Umar (R) their lands were liberated, cuz their reign wasnt guided by lust for materialism rather spiritualism, after those 4 caliphs (around 30 years after death of Prophet (S.A.W) arab nationalism and materialistic kingdoms (just like any other kingdom) like ummayads started
That is very unfortunate part of our History that after the Centralized reign of Gupta,the subcontinent devided into small feudal principalities who fought between each other ,a good opportunity for invaders
Even Prithviraj was just a Feudal lord
Not all Rajupts but Chauhan Clan.please dont quote the soft **** called chachnama to which bin qasim probably jacked off.
Raja Dhir lost because the buddhists conspired against him and plotted his downfall.MBQ just took advantage.
Prithviraj was the Maharana of Ajmer,the king of the rajputs and hence Bharat too.
Arabs never got beyond Sindh. Arabs are notorious losers who rarely won wars. It was the non-Arab muslims who kept Islam flag flying.
Muhammed Ghaznavi was a Turk not Arab. The Seljuks were a central Asian nomadic tribe that was Islamised and later became Ghazis. The Mameluks were the "slave" turks. Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).
An Indian of all people badmouthing Arab military history which is unprecedented outside of Western military history
So by the time when Arabs defeated roman and Persian empires who was helping them in these scenarios?Arabs never got beyond Sindh. Arabs are notorious losers who rarely won wars. It was the non-Arab muslims who kept Islam flag flying.
Muhammed Ghaznavi was a Turk not Arab. The Seljuks were a central Asian nomadic tribe that was Islamised and later became Ghazis. The Mameluks were the "slave" turks. Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).
So by the time when Arabs defeated roman and Persian empires who was helping them in these scenarios?
After Huns it was divided into eastern and western parts . And Constantinople was conquered by sultan Muhammad fateh. But before all this Arabs defeated them in Arabian peninsula and Africa.The arabs did not destroy Rome. It was the Huns. And the Roman empire technically ended with the fall of the Byzantine empire when they lost Constantinople.
After Huns it was divided into eastern and western parts . And Constantinople was conquered by sultan Muhammad fateh. But before all this Arabs defeated them in Arabian peninsula and Africa.