What's new

Antony to induct LCA into Air Force on Dec 20

. .
. .
and some random troll knows better



yeah...about that...we just scuttled your avionics and stuff...so it don't mean much :)
A pathetic congi @ss licker knows better is it?

is that an aircraft carrier that your A.K.Anthony so beamingly sent his wife to inaugurate and is the fast pushing of a yet to be ready Tejas not an cheap election congi stunt?
 
.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

Your quote from wiki pretty much corroborates what I and Lil Matthew said :/

aint matter if you could understand or not
the outcome is the same - you have lost the argument

There is a visible technical gap between IOC and FOC unless you can disapprove the wikipedia's statement in my above quote

Regardless, if the iaf insists on starting mass {?} production upon IOC you are going to see alot of planes getting modifications lateron. And you are saying a production rate of 16~17 planes per year
then simple math can tell you the volume of post modification to do by each year's progress of IOC to FOC. good night then!:tsk::wave:
 
. . .
Seriously can't stand those struts holding the intakes to the fuselage. Please get DSI ASAP!

67994_594392283931521_59876078_n.jpg
 
.
A pathetic congi @ss licker knows better is it?

is that an aircraft carrier that your A.K.Anthony so beamingly sent his wife to inaugurate and is the fast pushing of a yet to be ready Tejas not an cheap election congi stunt?

A pathetic BJP @$$licker is back with his ignorant rating. Warships are usually launched by ladies, so the wife of the defence minister launching it is just fine (of course you didn't know that coz they didn't tell you that in RSS propaganda school). And if Vikrant is floated out launched and moved so that construction of INS vishaal can start only brainwashed BJP bhakts will find fault with that too. You're just a random troll, and you know more than MOD, IAF etc. put together?
 
.
aint matter if you could understand or not
the outcome is the same - you have lost the argument

There is a visible technical gap between IOC and FOC unless you can disapprove the wikipedia's statement in my above quote

Regardless, if the iaf insists on starting mass {?} production upon IOC you are going to see alot of planes getting modifications lateron. And you are saying a production rate of 16~17 planes per year
then simple math can tell you the volume of post modification to do by each year's progress of IOC to FOC. good night then!:tsk::wave:
What visible technical gap?
Is the gap so much to stop the induction of a plane?
 
. .
read the post wherein the wikipedia statement was quoted
The date at which IOC is achieved often defines the in-service date (ISD) for an associated system Declaration of an initial operating capability may imply that the capability will be developed in the future, for example by modifications or adjustments to improve the system's performance, deployment of greater numbers of systems (perhaps of different types), or testing and training that permit wider application of the capability.Once the capability is fully developed, Full Operational Capability may be declared.

Not a rule sir. It "may imply". So unless you specifically know of the technical gaps, your argument holds no ground
 
. .
ction rate would be 16-20/year as per HAL. And It can be increased if ordered in good numbers(may be with mk2).
www.articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-08-30/india/41617552_1_tejas-mk-i-operational-clearance-indian-navy
aint matter if you could understand or not
the outcome is the same - you have lost the argument

There is a visible technical gap between IOC and FOC unless you can disapprove the wikipedia's statement in my above quote

Regardless, if the iaf insists on starting mass {?} production upon IOC you are going to see alot of planes getting modifications lateron. And you are saying a production rate of 16~17 planes per year
then simple math can tell you the volume of post modification to do by each year's progress of IOC to FOC. good night then!:tsk::wave:

this is what RAAF defines IOC
IOC can be declared when one or more subsets of the capability can be deployed on operations. IOC considers the personnel, training, major systems, supplies, facilities and training areas, logistics, support, command and management required to deliver the subset of capability required.

Final Operational Capability is declared when the entire capability can be deployed on operations. FOC considers the personnel, training, major systems, supplies, facilities and training areas, logistics, support, command and management required to deliver the full capability required.

Capability - Royal Australian Air Force

obviously ioc donot require all the parameters to be satisfied it has got to do with more than just technical. LCA qualifies all the technical qualities and it will be granted ioc2 on dec 20th.more than 2400 sorties are completed till date and its satisfactory. will be given when the entire systems are installed to accommodate and use them
 
.
Back
Top Bottom