What's new

Ancient Man and His First Civilizations.Proving Aryan Invasion Theory is a myth and severe lie

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is a perfect idiotic statement .If Aryans are so much advanced why they cant create an advanced civilization in central asia itself.Dont argue without a rational analysis.Hinduism is a way of life not some conservative religion form under one God.
It roots are flow in Indian life thousands of years ago before Aryans arrive and Aryans contribution pathetic caste system.A noble system created by local Indians twisted and make it under caste, creed and colour.thats all.

This is an example of a very Idiotic Statement; Same reason the Mongol does. The Aryans were Nomads from the Steppe. They only know how to pillage & plunder to sustain themselves & their herds. Its only until they reach India they decided to settle down & abandon their Nomadic ways for an agricultural based one. Then why's Vedic is written in the Invader's tongue?
 
.
This is an example of a very Idiotic Statement; Same reason the Mongol does. The Aryans were Nomads from the Steppe. They only know how to pillage & plunder to sustain themselves & their herds. Its only until they reach India they decided to settle down & abandon their Nomadic ways for an agricultural based one. Then why's Vedic is written in the Invader's tongue?

I don't know why Indians are rejecting their ancestors. The Indians are mulatto of Caucasian looking Aryans and Australoid of Indian subcontinent. They are as much a mulatto as Mexicans are a mixture of Spanish and native Americans.
 
.
The Aryans were Nomads from the Steppe. They only know how to pillage & plunder to sustain themselves & their herds.

You excel at story telling. Now, can you prove that the Aryans were from Steppe?
 
.
This is an example of a very Idiotic Statement; Same reason the Mongol does. The Aryans were Nomads from the Steppe. They only know how to pillage & plunder to sustain themselves & their herds. Its only until they reach India they decided to settle down & abandon their Nomadic ways for an agricultural based one. Then why's Vedic is written in the Invader's tongue?

So called extra enlightment?:lol::lol::lol:.Aryans came here and changed a advanced civilization for their own advantage.
 
.
I don't know why Indians are rejecting their ancestors. The Indians are mulatto of Caucasian looking Aryans and Australoid of Indian subcontinent. They are as much a mulatto as Mexicans are a mixture of Spanish and native Americans.

Indians are not rejecting their ancestors and there is no reason to. Our ancestors are Africans because that is where life began. It is about time you stopped peddling 19th century myths and embraced science.
 
.
In this thread or just the overall argument and theories and stuff? Its ok man I just got into this stuff about a month ago anyway. :D

This thread is pretty funny basically the OP says that says India got albinos this proves the rest of the world came out of India lol. Then they post that last pic of a plain as day white chick probably visiting India or something and claim she is an Indian albino lol.

You only need to care about AIT.And that is the topic.I also agree there is some wrong in this article.about albinos.
 
.
@faithfulguy

I don't need to counter your myths because science has done them for me. However, a few questions for you.

1. The caste system is stronger than ever today. How come the north Indians did not know that they came from Europe until they were told by the European colonists themselves?

2. If such an event indeed took place why is there absolutely no written record of the same? Neither in the Hindu scriptures nor anywhere else.
 
.
They dispute it because of the implications, if they accept it then they will also have to accept that their civilization itself was given to them by foreigners lmaooo. India tells the rest of the world they are the oldest civilization on the earth with the oldest religion and oldest language but if they accept this then all those things came to them from migrants. :rofl:

Modern hinduism is based on the vedic civilization which came about after the migration of foreigners who then settled amongst people of the Indus. Mixing traditions it became known as vedic religion language customs etc. Later they moved east and they spread their religion and their sanskrit language to the people of India proper. These foundations gave birth to Hinduism itself.

Friend you are wrong.Aryans change a noble system in to perfect bad system.For example according to local Indian populations Brahmins means noble people not white people.But when Aryans become success invading in to India.They change all that and for them Brahmins is white people.And RigVeda talk about this.
 
.
@faithfulguy

I don't need to counter your myths because science has done them for me. However, a few questions for you.

1. The caste system is stronger than ever today. How come the north Indians did not know that they came from Europe until they were told by the European colonists themselves?

2. If such an event indeed took place why is there absolutely no written record of the same? Neither in the Hindu scriptures nor anywhere else.

1. The Indians did not come from Europe, but from the original home of Indo European people. This location is around Caucasus and Central Asia. And this happened before the invention of writing.

2. The events took place before the invention of writing. Before the time of legends and myth.
 
.
@faithful

You claim they brought the Rig Veda with them.

1. This wasn't written? If yes, it must have been oral then. So the scripture is passed down orally, the caste system is passed down orally and is stronger than ever but the fact that the north Indians are migrants and not indigenous to India is not known to them. Can you explain this miracle?
 
.
I don't know why Indians are rejecting their ancestors. The Indians are mulatto of Caucasian looking Aryans and Australoid of Indian subcontinent. They are as much a mulatto as Mexicans are a mixture of Spanish and native Americans.

May there is some european genes in Indians.But that doesnot mean that foreigners gave us advanced civilization.Europeans found out India in 1498 when Vasco da Gama land in kappad.but Europe at at that time is suffering with poverty and worst human conditions.And they clear their economy by looting India.So they dont gave us anything instead they loot us.Some Europeans at that time also integrate in to Indian society.So they destroy a rich country both culturally and economically.You know what I mean.
This is happens when Aryans invade India.Instead of destroying they turn an advanced society of local Indians populations for their own advantage.
 
.
Just in case you didn't know, Brahui people have lowest amount of ASI genes in them compared to anyother South Asian group. They are not related to South Indians at all genetically. Indo-Aryan Bengali is more similar to Dravidian south indian. SO even IVC people were not South Indians but ANI.

I just showed two examples how the IVC can be extrapolated as Dravidian, by deciphering the signs etc. You need to do some introspection, on why there's no traces of the cultural/religious , linguistic remnants left in Pakistan except for Brahuis speaking a Dravidian language and the excavated ruins .

Where are the cultural elements, prevalent during the IVC ? If you say a superior culture replaced an inferior culture that's just your personal bias , you cant claim proprietorship over a physical object just because its in your possession.

May there is some european genes in Indians..

Indians /Pakistanis were invaded by a host of foreigners, Greeks, Turks , Persian to name a few , that explains the racial mixture in the Northern part of the sub continent
 
Last edited:
.
I just showed two examples how the IVC can be extrapolated as Dravidian, by deciphering the signs etc. You need to do some introspection, on why there's no traces of the cultural/religious , linguistic remnants left in Pakistan except for Brahuis speaking a Dravidian language and the excavated ruins .

Where are the cultural elements, prevalent during the IVC ? If you say Islam replaced an inferior culture with a superior culture that's just your personal bias .



Indians /Pakistanis were invaded by a host of foreigners, Greeks, Turks , Persian to name a few , that explains the racial mixture in the Northern part of the sub continent

Southern part also.But here is some guys that claim Aryans gave us advanced civilization.it is wrong. Dravidians create advaced civilization .Rig Veda and all other Vedas they passed through oral talks is snatched by Aryans and make it their own advantage.

Stone Celt Axe Indus Sign Discovery in Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu, India
 
.
I don't know why Indians are rejecting their ancestors. The Indians are mulatto of Caucasian looking Aryans and Australoid of Indian subcontinent. They are as much a mulatto as Mexicans are a mixture of Spanish and native Americans.

What a surprise!

The ignoramus doesn't know about something he has no idea of and this is supposed to be some kind of news.

The Southern Hans like him are anyway looked down upon by their own kind.

The Australian aborigines would rank far higher than his kind any day...

And yes, they are a mulatto of Manchus, Mongols, part European (especially those near shores), may be part Japanese and hell knows what else...
 
Last edited:
.
Enough of the conspiracy theories. Science has given it's verdict. I already shared a discovery channel presentation on the same. This one is slightly more detailed.


Anyways, signing out of here. No more time to waste. Adios!

In our Dharmic scriptures, Aryan is not a race.

The European colonialists screwed up the whole thing because of their own selfish motives to prove that all good things came from the white Europeans.

And you have a mix of people who were (and are) looked down upon those colonialists trying to suck up to their failed and discredited theories just to get their daily dose of opium or just to parade their pathetic ignorance and obsession.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom