manlion
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2013
- Messages
- 7,568
- Reaction score
- -3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indians are not rejecting their ancestors and there is no reason to. Our ancestors are Africans because that is where life began. It is about time you stopped peddling 19th century myths and embraced science.
What I stated about Aryan invasion and the languages of invaders use by North Indians are not myth. Its reality.
@manlion
Similarities in languages cannot be the basis to determine migration patterns. Without scientific techniques (genetics/dating) we can merely speculate.
You said it so it must be true. The Bible says non-believers will rot in hell for eternity so it must be true. What stupendous logic! And the work of geneticists in the last half century must all be false since you consider science to be bunkum. And of course, you din't answer any of my questions directed to you because you already know that your fantasies are real. Congratulations!
Critical reasoning is not a strong point with this kind. Unfortunately far to many of them are just too brainwashed to learn anything other than what has been force fed...
Science and reasoning fall flat in the face of devious agendas.
@manlion
Similarities in languages cannot be the basis to determine migration patterns. Without scientific techniques (genetics/dating) we can merely speculate.
What genetic imprint have the british left on the subcontinent ?You are yet to justify the existence of two separate group of languages (or even race) Dravidian and Indo European. Language is a significant contributing factor to acertain migration or invasion of country e,g British India,
For instance, Rig veda, the earliest of the 4 vedas is in Sanskrit and has episodes mentioning possible Dravidian (Dasyus) genocide
In the Rig veda, Indra is the leader of the Aryan gods
1. “With all-outstripping chariot-wheel, O Indra, though far-famed, hast overthrown the twice ten kings of men With sixty thousand nine and ninety followers. Thou goest on from fight to fight intrepidly, destroying citadel after citadel with strength.”
2. "Thou, Indra, art the destroyer of all the cities, the slayer of the Dasyus, the lord of the sky." - Rg V. VIII 87.6
3. "Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshipper, he subdued the lawless for Manu, he conquered the Dasyus."
@manlion
Speculations galore! All the arguments in support of the AIT (including the ones you've enumerated) are demolished below.
So called extra enlightment?.Aryans came here and changed a advanced civilization for their own advantage.
What genetic imprint have the british left on the subcontinent ?
I don't know why Indians are rejecting their ancestors. The Indians are mulatto of Caucasian looking Aryans and Australoid of Indian subcontinent. They are as much a mulatto as Mexicans are a mixture of Spanish and native Americans.
That's why its called an Invasion theory. Imposing their will on the local populace.
When Aryan invade they came to India to settle & lord over the native.
While the British only colonize India for monetary reason & lord over the Native through Intermediary puppet kings. Frederick Lugard named it; "Ruled through & by the Natives.