Chogy
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,228
- Reaction score
- 0
@ Superkaif - ease up with the dancing devil banana. Are you a Satanist or something?
Now when did I ever say the USA would live forever? I didn't. I did say we will weather this particular crisis. The "imminent collapse" is fantasy.
No, but it is an important indicator. Everyone in this thread keeps emphasizing excess consumption. The reality is that the U.S. produces as well as consumes, and the production spans a wide range, from raw materials, to food, to technology. China likewise does this; they are not a one-trick pony sitting on vast pools of oil or minerals. A nation that can turn resources into desirable consumables is powerful.
I never implied this, and don't necessarily believe in it, but the numbers indicate it to a degree. You have to run with the data that is available.
Far less than people want to believe. We do not cram blue jeans and iPods down peoples' throats. U.S. products and intellectual creations are in demand around the world.
I know you understand this, but so many people chant the "U.S. went to war for oil/resources" mantra, that it becomes believed... completely ignoring basic economics 101 - it's really, really stupid to spend 1 trillion $$ in a war to "steal" oil that could be purchased on the open market for $50 billion. Thus, we didn't go to war for oil, nor are we ravaging Muslim nations based on Bible prophecies. We certainly didn't pound Japan, Germany, Italy, Korea, Vietnam, over religion, did we? And what happened in the Yugoslav Wars? Who did we support?
The debt is a concern. Not a fatal disease.
The roman empire also thought it was forever. Do you not understand the simple concept that you can not live beyond your means.
Now when did I ever say the USA would live forever? I didn't. I did say we will weather this particular crisis. The "imminent collapse" is fantasy.
Economics is not a race.
No, but it is an important indicator. Everyone in this thread keeps emphasizing excess consumption. The reality is that the U.S. produces as well as consumes, and the production spans a wide range, from raw materials, to food, to technology. China likewise does this; they are not a one-trick pony sitting on vast pools of oil or minerals. A nation that can turn resources into desirable consumables is powerful.
There is no prize for passing the US. Not sure why the US in decline will mean that China would be in the ascent. This applies to geopolitics as well. There is no indication that China wants America's job of global control.
I never implied this, and don't necessarily believe in it, but the numbers indicate it to a degree. You have to run with the data that is available.
But how much of the US economy is dependent on your foreign policy muscle?
Far less than people want to believe. We do not cram blue jeans and iPods down peoples' throats. U.S. products and intellectual creations are in demand around the world.
I know you understand this, but so many people chant the "U.S. went to war for oil/resources" mantra, that it becomes believed... completely ignoring basic economics 101 - it's really, really stupid to spend 1 trillion $$ in a war to "steal" oil that could be purchased on the open market for $50 billion. Thus, we didn't go to war for oil, nor are we ravaging Muslim nations based on Bible prophecies. We certainly didn't pound Japan, Germany, Italy, Korea, Vietnam, over religion, did we? And what happened in the Yugoslav Wars? Who did we support?
The debt is a concern. Not a fatal disease.